Assessing testimonial evidence in asylum proceedings: Guiding standards from the international criminal tribunals

Rosemary Byrne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although credibility determinations rest at the core of refugee protection, international refugee law has failed to develop a body of evidentiary principles that is tailored to the unique dimensions of the testimony of those seeking asylum. This article examines recent developments in assessing oral testimony in international criminal law. International criminal law judges, like national asylum adjudicators, must transcend geographic, linguistic, cultural, educational and psychological barriers in order to assess the credibility of testimony. As a result, these new international courts have developed a body of principles of international evidence law for assessing the testimony of alleged victims of, and witnesses to, human rights abuses. Current social science research on the asylum procedures in several jurisdictions reveals that asylum decision makers often fail to adapt the determination process to account for the realities of refugees presenting their cases in legal fora, directing proceedings with a 'presumptive skepticism' of claims. It is argued that the nuanced and rigourous model for the assessment of the testimonial evidence of alleged victims and witnesses of human rights abuses in war crimes trials introduces effective international norms for the assessment of credibility in asylum proceedings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)609-638
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Journal of Refugee Law
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

refugee
testimony
international law
credibility
human rights
criminal law
witness
evidence
abuse
asylum procedure
crime
refugee law
war crime
decision maker
jurisdiction
social science
linguistics
Law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Cite this

Assessing testimonial evidence in asylum proceedings : Guiding standards from the international criminal tribunals. / Byrne, Rosemary.

In: International Journal of Refugee Law, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.12.2007, p. 609-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbfb7745d3f2400c89a298ec31e0e4f5,
title = "Assessing testimonial evidence in asylum proceedings: Guiding standards from the international criminal tribunals",
abstract = "Although credibility determinations rest at the core of refugee protection, international refugee law has failed to develop a body of evidentiary principles that is tailored to the unique dimensions of the testimony of those seeking asylum. This article examines recent developments in assessing oral testimony in international criminal law. International criminal law judges, like national asylum adjudicators, must transcend geographic, linguistic, cultural, educational and psychological barriers in order to assess the credibility of testimony. As a result, these new international courts have developed a body of principles of international evidence law for assessing the testimony of alleged victims of, and witnesses to, human rights abuses. Current social science research on the asylum procedures in several jurisdictions reveals that asylum decision makers often fail to adapt the determination process to account for the realities of refugees presenting their cases in legal fora, directing proceedings with a 'presumptive skepticism' of claims. It is argued that the nuanced and rigourous model for the assessment of the testimonial evidence of alleged victims and witnesses of human rights abuses in war crimes trials introduces effective international norms for the assessment of credibility in asylum proceedings.",
author = "Rosemary Byrne",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ijrl/eem056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "609--638",
journal = "International Journal of Refugee Law",
issn = "0953-8186",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing testimonial evidence in asylum proceedings

T2 - Guiding standards from the international criminal tribunals

AU - Byrne, Rosemary

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Although credibility determinations rest at the core of refugee protection, international refugee law has failed to develop a body of evidentiary principles that is tailored to the unique dimensions of the testimony of those seeking asylum. This article examines recent developments in assessing oral testimony in international criminal law. International criminal law judges, like national asylum adjudicators, must transcend geographic, linguistic, cultural, educational and psychological barriers in order to assess the credibility of testimony. As a result, these new international courts have developed a body of principles of international evidence law for assessing the testimony of alleged victims of, and witnesses to, human rights abuses. Current social science research on the asylum procedures in several jurisdictions reveals that asylum decision makers often fail to adapt the determination process to account for the realities of refugees presenting their cases in legal fora, directing proceedings with a 'presumptive skepticism' of claims. It is argued that the nuanced and rigourous model for the assessment of the testimonial evidence of alleged victims and witnesses of human rights abuses in war crimes trials introduces effective international norms for the assessment of credibility in asylum proceedings.

AB - Although credibility determinations rest at the core of refugee protection, international refugee law has failed to develop a body of evidentiary principles that is tailored to the unique dimensions of the testimony of those seeking asylum. This article examines recent developments in assessing oral testimony in international criminal law. International criminal law judges, like national asylum adjudicators, must transcend geographic, linguistic, cultural, educational and psychological barriers in order to assess the credibility of testimony. As a result, these new international courts have developed a body of principles of international evidence law for assessing the testimony of alleged victims of, and witnesses to, human rights abuses. Current social science research on the asylum procedures in several jurisdictions reveals that asylum decision makers often fail to adapt the determination process to account for the realities of refugees presenting their cases in legal fora, directing proceedings with a 'presumptive skepticism' of claims. It is argued that the nuanced and rigourous model for the assessment of the testimonial evidence of alleged victims and witnesses of human rights abuses in war crimes trials introduces effective international norms for the assessment of credibility in asylum proceedings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449130449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449130449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijrl/eem056

DO - 10.1093/ijrl/eem056

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:44449130449

VL - 19

SP - 609

EP - 638

JO - International Journal of Refugee Law

JF - International Journal of Refugee Law

SN - 0953-8186

IS - 4

ER -