Assessing Hyolaryngeal Excursion: Comparing Quantitative Methods to Palpation at the Bedside and Visualization During Videofluoroscopy

Danielle Brates, Sonja Molfenter, Susan L. Thibeault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Hyolaryngeal excursion (HE) is typically assessed via palpation during clinical swallowing exams (CSE) or visually during videofluoroscopy (VFSS). Minimal evidence exists to support the use of these perceptual methods for judging HE. We investigated whether binary judgment of HE differentiates quantitative measures of hyoid movement, using frame-by-frame VFSS analysis to measure anatomically scaled peak hyoid positions. Methods: Medical records of patients who received a CSE and VFSS within a 24-h period were reviewed. Clinician ratings of HE (‘reduced’ or ‘normal’) were collected from CSE and VFSS reports, along with rater experience. Five ml puree swallows were extracted from each VFSS for randomized, blinded analysis. Peak hyoid position from C4 was captured in anterior, superior, and hypotenuse positions and expressed relative to C2–C4 length. T-test comparisons of hyoid positions between patients judged to have reduced versus normal HE on palpation and VFSS were conducted. Results: Eighty-seven patients (56 male, mean age 61) met criteria. Peak anterior hyoid position was significantly different between patients judged to have reduced (mean = 89.2% C2–C4) and normal (mean = 110.6% C2–C4) HE on palpation (p = 0.001). Further analysis revealed no effect of clinician experience on differentiation of objective measures based on palpation. No differences were found across any objective measures when compared to clinician VFSS ratings. Conclusions: Clinicians appeared to be able to differentiate peak anterior hyoid movement but not superior or hypotenuse movement on palpation. On VFSS visualization, no significant differences were found between swallows judged to have reduced versus normal HE in any directional dimension. While perceptual methods may contribute to clinical decision-making, clinicians should remain cautious when making judgments about HE using these methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDysphagia
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Palpation
Deglutition
Swallows
Medical Records

Keywords

  • Clinical swallowing evaluation
  • Deglutition
  • Deglutition disorders
  • Dysphagia
  • Hyolaryngeal excursion
  • Palpation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{64b4c7778bd24c42973cb02089d7db43,
title = "Assessing Hyolaryngeal Excursion: Comparing Quantitative Methods to Palpation at the Bedside and Visualization During Videofluoroscopy",
abstract = "Purpose: Hyolaryngeal excursion (HE) is typically assessed via palpation during clinical swallowing exams (CSE) or visually during videofluoroscopy (VFSS). Minimal evidence exists to support the use of these perceptual methods for judging HE. We investigated whether binary judgment of HE differentiates quantitative measures of hyoid movement, using frame-by-frame VFSS analysis to measure anatomically scaled peak hyoid positions. Methods: Medical records of patients who received a CSE and VFSS within a 24-h period were reviewed. Clinician ratings of HE (‘reduced’ or ‘normal’) were collected from CSE and VFSS reports, along with rater experience. Five ml puree swallows were extracted from each VFSS for randomized, blinded analysis. Peak hyoid position from C4 was captured in anterior, superior, and hypotenuse positions and expressed relative to C2–C4 length. T-test comparisons of hyoid positions between patients judged to have reduced versus normal HE on palpation and VFSS were conducted. Results: Eighty-seven patients (56 male, mean age 61) met criteria. Peak anterior hyoid position was significantly different between patients judged to have reduced (mean = 89.2{\%} C2–C4) and normal (mean = 110.6{\%} C2–C4) HE on palpation (p = 0.001). Further analysis revealed no effect of clinician experience on differentiation of objective measures based on palpation. No differences were found across any objective measures when compared to clinician VFSS ratings. Conclusions: Clinicians appeared to be able to differentiate peak anterior hyoid movement but not superior or hypotenuse movement on palpation. On VFSS visualization, no significant differences were found between swallows judged to have reduced versus normal HE in any directional dimension. While perceptual methods may contribute to clinical decision-making, clinicians should remain cautious when making judgments about HE using these methods.",
keywords = "Clinical swallowing evaluation, Deglutition, Deglutition disorders, Dysphagia, Hyolaryngeal excursion, Palpation",
author = "Danielle Brates and Sonja Molfenter and Thibeault, {Susan L.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s00455-018-9927-2",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Dysphagia",
issn = "0179-051X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Hyolaryngeal Excursion

T2 - Comparing Quantitative Methods to Palpation at the Bedside and Visualization During Videofluoroscopy

AU - Brates, Danielle

AU - Molfenter, Sonja

AU - Thibeault, Susan L.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Purpose: Hyolaryngeal excursion (HE) is typically assessed via palpation during clinical swallowing exams (CSE) or visually during videofluoroscopy (VFSS). Minimal evidence exists to support the use of these perceptual methods for judging HE. We investigated whether binary judgment of HE differentiates quantitative measures of hyoid movement, using frame-by-frame VFSS analysis to measure anatomically scaled peak hyoid positions. Methods: Medical records of patients who received a CSE and VFSS within a 24-h period were reviewed. Clinician ratings of HE (‘reduced’ or ‘normal’) were collected from CSE and VFSS reports, along with rater experience. Five ml puree swallows were extracted from each VFSS for randomized, blinded analysis. Peak hyoid position from C4 was captured in anterior, superior, and hypotenuse positions and expressed relative to C2–C4 length. T-test comparisons of hyoid positions between patients judged to have reduced versus normal HE on palpation and VFSS were conducted. Results: Eighty-seven patients (56 male, mean age 61) met criteria. Peak anterior hyoid position was significantly different between patients judged to have reduced (mean = 89.2% C2–C4) and normal (mean = 110.6% C2–C4) HE on palpation (p = 0.001). Further analysis revealed no effect of clinician experience on differentiation of objective measures based on palpation. No differences were found across any objective measures when compared to clinician VFSS ratings. Conclusions: Clinicians appeared to be able to differentiate peak anterior hyoid movement but not superior or hypotenuse movement on palpation. On VFSS visualization, no significant differences were found between swallows judged to have reduced versus normal HE in any directional dimension. While perceptual methods may contribute to clinical decision-making, clinicians should remain cautious when making judgments about HE using these methods.

AB - Purpose: Hyolaryngeal excursion (HE) is typically assessed via palpation during clinical swallowing exams (CSE) or visually during videofluoroscopy (VFSS). Minimal evidence exists to support the use of these perceptual methods for judging HE. We investigated whether binary judgment of HE differentiates quantitative measures of hyoid movement, using frame-by-frame VFSS analysis to measure anatomically scaled peak hyoid positions. Methods: Medical records of patients who received a CSE and VFSS within a 24-h period were reviewed. Clinician ratings of HE (‘reduced’ or ‘normal’) were collected from CSE and VFSS reports, along with rater experience. Five ml puree swallows were extracted from each VFSS for randomized, blinded analysis. Peak hyoid position from C4 was captured in anterior, superior, and hypotenuse positions and expressed relative to C2–C4 length. T-test comparisons of hyoid positions between patients judged to have reduced versus normal HE on palpation and VFSS were conducted. Results: Eighty-seven patients (56 male, mean age 61) met criteria. Peak anterior hyoid position was significantly different between patients judged to have reduced (mean = 89.2% C2–C4) and normal (mean = 110.6% C2–C4) HE on palpation (p = 0.001). Further analysis revealed no effect of clinician experience on differentiation of objective measures based on palpation. No differences were found across any objective measures when compared to clinician VFSS ratings. Conclusions: Clinicians appeared to be able to differentiate peak anterior hyoid movement but not superior or hypotenuse movement on palpation. On VFSS visualization, no significant differences were found between swallows judged to have reduced versus normal HE in any directional dimension. While perceptual methods may contribute to clinical decision-making, clinicians should remain cautious when making judgments about HE using these methods.

KW - Clinical swallowing evaluation

KW - Deglutition

KW - Deglutition disorders

KW - Dysphagia

KW - Hyolaryngeal excursion

KW - Palpation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050590831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050590831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00455-018-9927-2

DO - 10.1007/s00455-018-9927-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 30043080

AN - SCOPUS:85050590831

JO - Dysphagia

JF - Dysphagia

SN - 0179-051X

ER -