Assessing everyday life functional activity using actual reality in persons with MS

Yael Goverover, John DeLuca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) can have dramatic effects on performance of everyday life activity. However, the ability to assess everyday functional activity remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to establish validity and reliability to a performance-based assessment of everyday life activities called actual reality (AR). AR involves utilization of the Internet to perform three actual everyday life activities: purchasing (a) an airline ticket, (b) cookies, and (c) pizza. Method: A repeated measure design was used to examine 30 adults with MS who were recruited from a nonprofit rehabilitation research institution and 30 healthy controls (HC) living in the community. Participants were administered the 3 AR tasks twice, 3 weeks apart. Additionally, neuropsychological tests and self-report functional questionnaires were administered. Results: This study supported moderate to large Interrater Reliability of the AR assessment. Additionally, the 3 AR tasks did not differ in the number of errors made, and number and quality of cues required to complete the AR tasks. Participants with MS committed more errors, and required significantly more cues to perform the 3 AR tasks successfully compared with HC, supporting discriminant validity of the AR. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to large associations between AR performance and neuropsychological test scores. Practice effect was observed for cognitive processes and the time it took participants to perform the task. Conclusions: Data support the use of actual, real-life, performance-based approach to measuring functional cognition outcomes. However, the observed practice effects for AR-cognitive capacity and AR-latency should be noted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-285
Number of pages10
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Volume63
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Multiple Sclerosis
Neuropsychological Tests
Cues
Aptitude
Reproducibility of Results
Internet
Self Report
Cognition
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Cognition
  • Functional cognition
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Assessing everyday life functional activity using actual reality in persons with MS. / Goverover, Yael; DeLuca, John.

In: Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 276-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8907ea9add9043c9a4d3f3ec5af7df55,
title = "Assessing everyday life functional activity using actual reality in persons with MS",
abstract = "Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) can have dramatic effects on performance of everyday life activity. However, the ability to assess everyday functional activity remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to establish validity and reliability to a performance-based assessment of everyday life activities called actual reality (AR). AR involves utilization of the Internet to perform three actual everyday life activities: purchasing (a) an airline ticket, (b) cookies, and (c) pizza. Method: A repeated measure design was used to examine 30 adults with MS who were recruited from a nonprofit rehabilitation research institution and 30 healthy controls (HC) living in the community. Participants were administered the 3 AR tasks twice, 3 weeks apart. Additionally, neuropsychological tests and self-report functional questionnaires were administered. Results: This study supported moderate to large Interrater Reliability of the AR assessment. Additionally, the 3 AR tasks did not differ in the number of errors made, and number and quality of cues required to complete the AR tasks. Participants with MS committed more errors, and required significantly more cues to perform the 3 AR tasks successfully compared with HC, supporting discriminant validity of the AR. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to large associations between AR performance and neuropsychological test scores. Practice effect was observed for cognitive processes and the time it took participants to perform the task. Conclusions: Data support the use of actual, real-life, performance-based approach to measuring functional cognition outcomes. However, the observed practice effects for AR-cognitive capacity and AR-latency should be noted.",
keywords = "Activities of daily living, Cognition, Functional cognition, Rehabilitation",
author = "Yael Goverover and John DeLuca",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/rep0000212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "276--285",
journal = "Rehabilitation Psychology",
issn = "0090-5550",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing everyday life functional activity using actual reality in persons with MS

AU - Goverover, Yael

AU - DeLuca, John

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) can have dramatic effects on performance of everyday life activity. However, the ability to assess everyday functional activity remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to establish validity and reliability to a performance-based assessment of everyday life activities called actual reality (AR). AR involves utilization of the Internet to perform three actual everyday life activities: purchasing (a) an airline ticket, (b) cookies, and (c) pizza. Method: A repeated measure design was used to examine 30 adults with MS who were recruited from a nonprofit rehabilitation research institution and 30 healthy controls (HC) living in the community. Participants were administered the 3 AR tasks twice, 3 weeks apart. Additionally, neuropsychological tests and self-report functional questionnaires were administered. Results: This study supported moderate to large Interrater Reliability of the AR assessment. Additionally, the 3 AR tasks did not differ in the number of errors made, and number and quality of cues required to complete the AR tasks. Participants with MS committed more errors, and required significantly more cues to perform the 3 AR tasks successfully compared with HC, supporting discriminant validity of the AR. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to large associations between AR performance and neuropsychological test scores. Practice effect was observed for cognitive processes and the time it took participants to perform the task. Conclusions: Data support the use of actual, real-life, performance-based approach to measuring functional cognition outcomes. However, the observed practice effects for AR-cognitive capacity and AR-latency should be noted.

AB - Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) can have dramatic effects on performance of everyday life activity. However, the ability to assess everyday functional activity remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to establish validity and reliability to a performance-based assessment of everyday life activities called actual reality (AR). AR involves utilization of the Internet to perform three actual everyday life activities: purchasing (a) an airline ticket, (b) cookies, and (c) pizza. Method: A repeated measure design was used to examine 30 adults with MS who were recruited from a nonprofit rehabilitation research institution and 30 healthy controls (HC) living in the community. Participants were administered the 3 AR tasks twice, 3 weeks apart. Additionally, neuropsychological tests and self-report functional questionnaires were administered. Results: This study supported moderate to large Interrater Reliability of the AR assessment. Additionally, the 3 AR tasks did not differ in the number of errors made, and number and quality of cues required to complete the AR tasks. Participants with MS committed more errors, and required significantly more cues to perform the 3 AR tasks successfully compared with HC, supporting discriminant validity of the AR. Concurrent validity was supported by moderate to large associations between AR performance and neuropsychological test scores. Practice effect was observed for cognitive processes and the time it took participants to perform the task. Conclusions: Data support the use of actual, real-life, performance-based approach to measuring functional cognition outcomes. However, the observed practice effects for AR-cognitive capacity and AR-latency should be noted.

KW - Activities of daily living

KW - Cognition

KW - Functional cognition

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048234208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048234208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/rep0000212

DO - 10.1037/rep0000212

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 276

EP - 285

JO - Rehabilitation Psychology

JF - Rehabilitation Psychology

SN - 0090-5550

IS - 2

ER -