Artist as owner not guarantor: The art market from the artist’s point of view

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The events of 2016 in which the painter Peter Doig (b. 1959) was sued in US Federal Court for failing to authenticate an artwork for a speculative investor encapsulate a view of the art world from the perspective of collectors and not artists. This paper imagines what would happen if artists were to retain 10% equity in their work in the primary market, rather than receive resale royalties in the secondary market. This idea applies the Coase Theorem in economics, concerning the relationship of property rights, pricing, and trade. Accordingly, those equity shares could trade in a standalone marketplace well before an artwork was sold, providing patronage for artists and more diversifiable art fund structures for investors. Technological systems such as the blockchain (e.g. bitcoin) make such a system timely, by providing cheap accounting and automatic provenance. This proposal stands in stark contrast to much of the writing on resale royalties, which treats payments to artists as welfare or subsidy, or emphasizes a lack of enforceability. In fact, assigning equity shares to artists allows them to participate more accurately, from a free-market-economics standpoint, in the value that their work creates. This realignment of price and value could radically alter and also stabilize the art market in relation to both recent financial crises and the increasing financialization of art objects. Such a system has broad applications to the alignment of price and value in many other sectors of creative work, and beyond.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-64
Number of pages17
JournalVisual Resources
Volume34
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2018

Fingerprint

Artist
Art Market
Equity
Economics
Royalty
Artwork
Investors
Art World
Technological Systems
Property Rights
Art Objects
Financialization
Peter Doig
Patronage
Realignment
Financial Crisis
Collectors
Creative Work
Art Fund
Free Market

Keywords

  • Art markets
  • Authentication
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Coase theorem
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Ether
  • Ethereum
  • Fractional ownership
  • Peter Doig (b. 1959)
  • Robert Rauschenberg (1925-2008)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Museology

Cite this

Artist as owner not guarantor : The art market from the artist’s point of view. / Whitaker, Amy.

In: Visual Resources, Vol. 34, No. 1-2, 03.04.2018, p. 48-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{05b761c4cd664068a68028abb0727e16,
title = "Artist as owner not guarantor: The art market from the artist’s point of view",
abstract = "The events of 2016 in which the painter Peter Doig (b. 1959) was sued in US Federal Court for failing to authenticate an artwork for a speculative investor encapsulate a view of the art world from the perspective of collectors and not artists. This paper imagines what would happen if artists were to retain 10{\%} equity in their work in the primary market, rather than receive resale royalties in the secondary market. This idea applies the Coase Theorem in economics, concerning the relationship of property rights, pricing, and trade. Accordingly, those equity shares could trade in a standalone marketplace well before an artwork was sold, providing patronage for artists and more diversifiable art fund structures for investors. Technological systems such as the blockchain (e.g. bitcoin) make such a system timely, by providing cheap accounting and automatic provenance. This proposal stands in stark contrast to much of the writing on resale royalties, which treats payments to artists as welfare or subsidy, or emphasizes a lack of enforceability. In fact, assigning equity shares to artists allows them to participate more accurately, from a free-market-economics standpoint, in the value that their work creates. This realignment of price and value could radically alter and also stabilize the art market in relation to both recent financial crises and the increasing financialization of art objects. Such a system has broad applications to the alignment of price and value in many other sectors of creative work, and beyond.",
keywords = "Art markets, Authentication, Bitcoin, Blockchain, Coase theorem, Cryptocurrency, Ether, Ethereum, Fractional ownership, Peter Doig (b. 1959), Robert Rauschenberg (1925-2008)",
author = "Amy Whitaker",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/01973762.2018.1435609",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "48--64",
journal = "Visual Resources",
issn = "0197-3762",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Artist as owner not guarantor

T2 - The art market from the artist’s point of view

AU - Whitaker, Amy

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - The events of 2016 in which the painter Peter Doig (b. 1959) was sued in US Federal Court for failing to authenticate an artwork for a speculative investor encapsulate a view of the art world from the perspective of collectors and not artists. This paper imagines what would happen if artists were to retain 10% equity in their work in the primary market, rather than receive resale royalties in the secondary market. This idea applies the Coase Theorem in economics, concerning the relationship of property rights, pricing, and trade. Accordingly, those equity shares could trade in a standalone marketplace well before an artwork was sold, providing patronage for artists and more diversifiable art fund structures for investors. Technological systems such as the blockchain (e.g. bitcoin) make such a system timely, by providing cheap accounting and automatic provenance. This proposal stands in stark contrast to much of the writing on resale royalties, which treats payments to artists as welfare or subsidy, or emphasizes a lack of enforceability. In fact, assigning equity shares to artists allows them to participate more accurately, from a free-market-economics standpoint, in the value that their work creates. This realignment of price and value could radically alter and also stabilize the art market in relation to both recent financial crises and the increasing financialization of art objects. Such a system has broad applications to the alignment of price and value in many other sectors of creative work, and beyond.

AB - The events of 2016 in which the painter Peter Doig (b. 1959) was sued in US Federal Court for failing to authenticate an artwork for a speculative investor encapsulate a view of the art world from the perspective of collectors and not artists. This paper imagines what would happen if artists were to retain 10% equity in their work in the primary market, rather than receive resale royalties in the secondary market. This idea applies the Coase Theorem in economics, concerning the relationship of property rights, pricing, and trade. Accordingly, those equity shares could trade in a standalone marketplace well before an artwork was sold, providing patronage for artists and more diversifiable art fund structures for investors. Technological systems such as the blockchain (e.g. bitcoin) make such a system timely, by providing cheap accounting and automatic provenance. This proposal stands in stark contrast to much of the writing on resale royalties, which treats payments to artists as welfare or subsidy, or emphasizes a lack of enforceability. In fact, assigning equity shares to artists allows them to participate more accurately, from a free-market-economics standpoint, in the value that their work creates. This realignment of price and value could radically alter and also stabilize the art market in relation to both recent financial crises and the increasing financialization of art objects. Such a system has broad applications to the alignment of price and value in many other sectors of creative work, and beyond.

KW - Art markets

KW - Authentication

KW - Bitcoin

KW - Blockchain

KW - Coase theorem

KW - Cryptocurrency

KW - Ether

KW - Ethereum

KW - Fractional ownership

KW - Peter Doig (b. 1959)

KW - Robert Rauschenberg (1925-2008)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046076734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046076734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01973762.2018.1435609

DO - 10.1080/01973762.2018.1435609

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 48

EP - 64

JO - Visual Resources

JF - Visual Resources

SN - 0197-3762

IS - 1-2

ER -