Are schools shortchanging boys or girls? The answer rests on methods and assumptions: Reply to Card (2014) and Penner (2014)

Joseph P. Robinson-Cimpian, Sarah Theule Lubienski, Colleen M. Ganley, Yasemin Copur-Gencturk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our target article (Robinson-Cimpian, Lubienski, Ganley, & Copur-Gencturk, 2014) used nationally representative data to examine the development of gender gaps in math achievement. We found that when boys and girls demonstrate equivalent math test performance and are perceived by their teachers to be equally well behaved and engaged with the material, teachers tend to rate girls as less proficient in math than boys (Study 1). Moreover, this underrating of girls' proficiency appeared to contribute substantially to a widening gender gap in early elementary school (Study 2). In this response, we use the thoughtful comments of Card (2014) and Penner (2014) as a springboard for discussing the methodologies and assumptions of some of the most recent research using nationally representative data to explore gender inequities. In the process, we shed light on how recent works using the same data reach different conclusions. We also make recommendations regarding the use of such data for understanding the development of the gender gap and for designing effective interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1840-1844
Number of pages5
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

gender
school
teacher
elementary school
methodology
Research
performance

Keywords

  • Achievement gap
  • Elementary school
  • Gender
  • Mathematics
  • Quasi-experimental designs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies
  • Demography

Cite this

Are schools shortchanging boys or girls? The answer rests on methods and assumptions : Reply to Card (2014) and Penner (2014). / Robinson-Cimpian, Joseph P.; Lubienski, Sarah Theule; Ganley, Colleen M.; Copur-Gencturk, Yasemin.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 6, 2014, p. 1840-1844.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robinson-Cimpian, Joseph P. ; Lubienski, Sarah Theule ; Ganley, Colleen M. ; Copur-Gencturk, Yasemin. / Are schools shortchanging boys or girls? The answer rests on methods and assumptions : Reply to Card (2014) and Penner (2014). In: Developmental Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 1840-1844.
@article{963076c0fbed4409adb78b2087986646,
title = "Are schools shortchanging boys or girls? The answer rests on methods and assumptions: Reply to Card (2014) and Penner (2014)",
abstract = "Our target article (Robinson-Cimpian, Lubienski, Ganley, & Copur-Gencturk, 2014) used nationally representative data to examine the development of gender gaps in math achievement. We found that when boys and girls demonstrate equivalent math test performance and are perceived by their teachers to be equally well behaved and engaged with the material, teachers tend to rate girls as less proficient in math than boys (Study 1). Moreover, this underrating of girls' proficiency appeared to contribute substantially to a widening gender gap in early elementary school (Study 2). In this response, we use the thoughtful comments of Card (2014) and Penner (2014) as a springboard for discussing the methodologies and assumptions of some of the most recent research using nationally representative data to explore gender inequities. In the process, we shed light on how recent works using the same data reach different conclusions. We also make recommendations regarding the use of such data for understanding the development of the gender gap and for designing effective interventions.",
keywords = "Achievement gap, Elementary school, Gender, Mathematics, Quasi-experimental designs",
author = "Robinson-Cimpian, {Joseph P.} and Lubienski, {Sarah Theule} and Ganley, {Colleen M.} and Yasemin Copur-Gencturk",
year = "2014",
doi = "doi.org/10.1037/a0036693",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "1840--1844",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are schools shortchanging boys or girls? The answer rests on methods and assumptions

T2 - Reply to Card (2014) and Penner (2014)

AU - Robinson-Cimpian, Joseph P.

AU - Lubienski, Sarah Theule

AU - Ganley, Colleen M.

AU - Copur-Gencturk, Yasemin

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Our target article (Robinson-Cimpian, Lubienski, Ganley, & Copur-Gencturk, 2014) used nationally representative data to examine the development of gender gaps in math achievement. We found that when boys and girls demonstrate equivalent math test performance and are perceived by their teachers to be equally well behaved and engaged with the material, teachers tend to rate girls as less proficient in math than boys (Study 1). Moreover, this underrating of girls' proficiency appeared to contribute substantially to a widening gender gap in early elementary school (Study 2). In this response, we use the thoughtful comments of Card (2014) and Penner (2014) as a springboard for discussing the methodologies and assumptions of some of the most recent research using nationally representative data to explore gender inequities. In the process, we shed light on how recent works using the same data reach different conclusions. We also make recommendations regarding the use of such data for understanding the development of the gender gap and for designing effective interventions.

AB - Our target article (Robinson-Cimpian, Lubienski, Ganley, & Copur-Gencturk, 2014) used nationally representative data to examine the development of gender gaps in math achievement. We found that when boys and girls demonstrate equivalent math test performance and are perceived by their teachers to be equally well behaved and engaged with the material, teachers tend to rate girls as less proficient in math than boys (Study 1). Moreover, this underrating of girls' proficiency appeared to contribute substantially to a widening gender gap in early elementary school (Study 2). In this response, we use the thoughtful comments of Card (2014) and Penner (2014) as a springboard for discussing the methodologies and assumptions of some of the most recent research using nationally representative data to explore gender inequities. In the process, we shed light on how recent works using the same data reach different conclusions. We also make recommendations regarding the use of such data for understanding the development of the gender gap and for designing effective interventions.

KW - Achievement gap

KW - Elementary school

KW - Gender

KW - Mathematics

KW - Quasi-experimental designs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901389739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901389739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - doi.org/10.1037/a0036693

DO - doi.org/10.1037/a0036693

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 1840

EP - 1844

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 6

ER -