Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts

Marialuisa Martelli, Najib J. Majaj, Denis Pelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Do we identify an object as a whole or by its parts? This simple question has been surprisingly hard to answer. It has been suggested that faces are recognized as wholes and words are recognized by parts. Here we answer the question by applying a test for crowding. In crowding, a target is harder to identify in the presence of nearby flankers. Previous work has described crowding between objects. We show that crowding also occurs between the parts of an object. Such internal crowding severely impairs perception, identification, and fMRI face-area activation. We apply a diagnostic test for crowding to a word and a face, and we find that the critical spacing of the parts required for recognition is proportional to distance from fixation and independent of size and kind. The critical spacing defines an isolation field around the target. Some objects can be recognized only when each part is isolated from the rest of the object by the critical spacing. In that case, recognition is by parts. Recognition is holistic if the observer can recognize the object even when the whole object fits within a critical spacing. Such an object has only one part. Multiple parts within an isolation field will crowd each other and spoil recognition. To assess the robustness of the crowding test, we manipulated familiarity through inversion and the face- and word-superiority effects. We find that threshold contrast for word and face identification is the product of two factors: familiarity and crowding. Familiarity increases sensitivity by a factor of ×1.5, independent of eccentricity, while crowding attenuates sensitivity more and more as eccentricity increases. Our findings show that observers process words and faces in much the same way. The effects of familiarity and crowding do not distinguish between them. Words and faces are both recognized by parts, and their parts - letters and facial features - are recognized holistically. We propose that internal crowding be taken as the signature of recognition by parts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6
Pages (from-to)58-70
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 4 2005

Fingerprint

Crowding
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Recognition (Psychology)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Crowding
  • Face recognition
  • Fce superiority
  • Feature integration
  • Holistic
  • Inversion
  • Isolation
  • Recognition by parts
  • Word recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. / Martelli, Marialuisa; Majaj, Najib J.; Pelli, Denis.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 5, No. 1, 6, 04.02.2005, p. 58-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martelli, Marialuisa ; Majaj, Najib J. ; Pelli, Denis. / Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. In: Journal of Vision. 2005 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 58-70.
@article{72710845381a43b6be4840d38761144f,
title = "Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts",
abstract = "Do we identify an object as a whole or by its parts? This simple question has been surprisingly hard to answer. It has been suggested that faces are recognized as wholes and words are recognized by parts. Here we answer the question by applying a test for crowding. In crowding, a target is harder to identify in the presence of nearby flankers. Previous work has described crowding between objects. We show that crowding also occurs between the parts of an object. Such internal crowding severely impairs perception, identification, and fMRI face-area activation. We apply a diagnostic test for crowding to a word and a face, and we find that the critical spacing of the parts required for recognition is proportional to distance from fixation and independent of size and kind. The critical spacing defines an isolation field around the target. Some objects can be recognized only when each part is isolated from the rest of the object by the critical spacing. In that case, recognition is by parts. Recognition is holistic if the observer can recognize the object even when the whole object fits within a critical spacing. Such an object has only one part. Multiple parts within an isolation field will crowd each other and spoil recognition. To assess the robustness of the crowding test, we manipulated familiarity through inversion and the face- and word-superiority effects. We find that threshold contrast for word and face identification is the product of two factors: familiarity and crowding. Familiarity increases sensitivity by a factor of ×1.5, independent of eccentricity, while crowding attenuates sensitivity more and more as eccentricity increases. Our findings show that observers process words and faces in much the same way. The effects of familiarity and crowding do not distinguish between them. Words and faces are both recognized by parts, and their parts - letters and facial features - are recognized holistically. We propose that internal crowding be taken as the signature of recognition by parts.",
keywords = "Crowding, Face recognition, Fce superiority, Feature integration, Holistic, Inversion, Isolation, Recognition by parts, Word recognition",
author = "Marialuisa Martelli and Majaj, {Najib J.} and Denis Pelli",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1167/5.1.6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "58--70",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts

AU - Martelli, Marialuisa

AU - Majaj, Najib J.

AU - Pelli, Denis

PY - 2005/2/4

Y1 - 2005/2/4

N2 - Do we identify an object as a whole or by its parts? This simple question has been surprisingly hard to answer. It has been suggested that faces are recognized as wholes and words are recognized by parts. Here we answer the question by applying a test for crowding. In crowding, a target is harder to identify in the presence of nearby flankers. Previous work has described crowding between objects. We show that crowding also occurs between the parts of an object. Such internal crowding severely impairs perception, identification, and fMRI face-area activation. We apply a diagnostic test for crowding to a word and a face, and we find that the critical spacing of the parts required for recognition is proportional to distance from fixation and independent of size and kind. The critical spacing defines an isolation field around the target. Some objects can be recognized only when each part is isolated from the rest of the object by the critical spacing. In that case, recognition is by parts. Recognition is holistic if the observer can recognize the object even when the whole object fits within a critical spacing. Such an object has only one part. Multiple parts within an isolation field will crowd each other and spoil recognition. To assess the robustness of the crowding test, we manipulated familiarity through inversion and the face- and word-superiority effects. We find that threshold contrast for word and face identification is the product of two factors: familiarity and crowding. Familiarity increases sensitivity by a factor of ×1.5, independent of eccentricity, while crowding attenuates sensitivity more and more as eccentricity increases. Our findings show that observers process words and faces in much the same way. The effects of familiarity and crowding do not distinguish between them. Words and faces are both recognized by parts, and their parts - letters and facial features - are recognized holistically. We propose that internal crowding be taken as the signature of recognition by parts.

AB - Do we identify an object as a whole or by its parts? This simple question has been surprisingly hard to answer. It has been suggested that faces are recognized as wholes and words are recognized by parts. Here we answer the question by applying a test for crowding. In crowding, a target is harder to identify in the presence of nearby flankers. Previous work has described crowding between objects. We show that crowding also occurs between the parts of an object. Such internal crowding severely impairs perception, identification, and fMRI face-area activation. We apply a diagnostic test for crowding to a word and a face, and we find that the critical spacing of the parts required for recognition is proportional to distance from fixation and independent of size and kind. The critical spacing defines an isolation field around the target. Some objects can be recognized only when each part is isolated from the rest of the object by the critical spacing. In that case, recognition is by parts. Recognition is holistic if the observer can recognize the object even when the whole object fits within a critical spacing. Such an object has only one part. Multiple parts within an isolation field will crowd each other and spoil recognition. To assess the robustness of the crowding test, we manipulated familiarity through inversion and the face- and word-superiority effects. We find that threshold contrast for word and face identification is the product of two factors: familiarity and crowding. Familiarity increases sensitivity by a factor of ×1.5, independent of eccentricity, while crowding attenuates sensitivity more and more as eccentricity increases. Our findings show that observers process words and faces in much the same way. The effects of familiarity and crowding do not distinguish between them. Words and faces are both recognized by parts, and their parts - letters and facial features - are recognized holistically. We propose that internal crowding be taken as the signature of recognition by parts.

KW - Crowding

KW - Face recognition

KW - Fce superiority

KW - Feature integration

KW - Holistic

KW - Inversion

KW - Isolation

KW - Recognition by parts

KW - Word recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27344455328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27344455328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/5.1.6

DO - 10.1167/5.1.6

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 58

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 1

M1 - 6

ER -