Are all schools created equal? Learning environments in small and large public high schools in New York City

Amy Ellen Schwartz, Leanna Stiefel, Matthew Wiswall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over the past two decades, high school reform has been characterized by a belief that “smaller is better.” Much of the expected academic benefit from attending small schools has been credited to their better learning environments. There is little empirical support for this claim, however, and the existing research fails to provide causal evidence. Moreover, recent studies in New York City have shown that students attending newly created small schools do better academically relative to students attending both large and older established small schools. Are these differences in academic outcomes also mirrored by differences in learning environments? In this paper, we address this question by exploring the impact of attending large compared to small high schools on students’ learning environments, considering the differences between small high schools formed in two different eras with different missions and resources. We use a unique data set of school and student-level data from New York City public high school students entering 9th grade in 2008–09 and 2009–10 to examine students’ attitudes about school learning environments along three dimensions: interpersonal relationships, academic expectations and support, and social behavior and safety. While OLS results show that students attending small schools (new and old) perceive better learning environments, instrumenting for selection into these schools challenges those results. In general, it is not clear that small schools provide better learning environments than large schools. Our results challenge the conventional wisdom that the higher academic performance of students in small schools is driven by a better learning environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-290
Number of pages19
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

learning environment
school
student
Learning environment
High school
school reform
social behavior
wisdom
school grade

Keywords

  • Learning environment
  • New small and old small schools
  • School climate
  • Small schools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Are all schools created equal? Learning environments in small and large public high schools in New York City. / Schwartz, Amy Ellen; Stiefel, Leanna; Wiswall, Matthew.

In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 52, 01.06.2016, p. 272-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b53a5667a9934486bee827314f8976d5,
title = "Are all schools created equal? Learning environments in small and large public high schools in New York City",
abstract = "Over the past two decades, high school reform has been characterized by a belief that “smaller is better.” Much of the expected academic benefit from attending small schools has been credited to their better learning environments. There is little empirical support for this claim, however, and the existing research fails to provide causal evidence. Moreover, recent studies in New York City have shown that students attending newly created small schools do better academically relative to students attending both large and older established small schools. Are these differences in academic outcomes also mirrored by differences in learning environments? In this paper, we address this question by exploring the impact of attending large compared to small high schools on students’ learning environments, considering the differences between small high schools formed in two different eras with different missions and resources. We use a unique data set of school and student-level data from New York City public high school students entering 9th grade in 2008–09 and 2009–10 to examine students’ attitudes about school learning environments along three dimensions: interpersonal relationships, academic expectations and support, and social behavior and safety. While OLS results show that students attending small schools (new and old) perceive better learning environments, instrumenting for selection into these schools challenges those results. In general, it is not clear that small schools provide better learning environments than large schools. Our results challenge the conventional wisdom that the higher academic performance of students in small schools is driven by a better learning environment.",
keywords = "Learning environment, New small and old small schools, School climate, Small schools",
author = "Schwartz, {Amy Ellen} and Leanna Stiefel and Matthew Wiswall",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "272--290",
journal = "Economics of Education Review",
issn = "0272-7757",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are all schools created equal? Learning environments in small and large public high schools in New York City

AU - Schwartz, Amy Ellen

AU - Stiefel, Leanna

AU - Wiswall, Matthew

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Over the past two decades, high school reform has been characterized by a belief that “smaller is better.” Much of the expected academic benefit from attending small schools has been credited to their better learning environments. There is little empirical support for this claim, however, and the existing research fails to provide causal evidence. Moreover, recent studies in New York City have shown that students attending newly created small schools do better academically relative to students attending both large and older established small schools. Are these differences in academic outcomes also mirrored by differences in learning environments? In this paper, we address this question by exploring the impact of attending large compared to small high schools on students’ learning environments, considering the differences between small high schools formed in two different eras with different missions and resources. We use a unique data set of school and student-level data from New York City public high school students entering 9th grade in 2008–09 and 2009–10 to examine students’ attitudes about school learning environments along three dimensions: interpersonal relationships, academic expectations and support, and social behavior and safety. While OLS results show that students attending small schools (new and old) perceive better learning environments, instrumenting for selection into these schools challenges those results. In general, it is not clear that small schools provide better learning environments than large schools. Our results challenge the conventional wisdom that the higher academic performance of students in small schools is driven by a better learning environment.

AB - Over the past two decades, high school reform has been characterized by a belief that “smaller is better.” Much of the expected academic benefit from attending small schools has been credited to their better learning environments. There is little empirical support for this claim, however, and the existing research fails to provide causal evidence. Moreover, recent studies in New York City have shown that students attending newly created small schools do better academically relative to students attending both large and older established small schools. Are these differences in academic outcomes also mirrored by differences in learning environments? In this paper, we address this question by exploring the impact of attending large compared to small high schools on students’ learning environments, considering the differences between small high schools formed in two different eras with different missions and resources. We use a unique data set of school and student-level data from New York City public high school students entering 9th grade in 2008–09 and 2009–10 to examine students’ attitudes about school learning environments along three dimensions: interpersonal relationships, academic expectations and support, and social behavior and safety. While OLS results show that students attending small schools (new and old) perceive better learning environments, instrumenting for selection into these schools challenges those results. In general, it is not clear that small schools provide better learning environments than large schools. Our results challenge the conventional wisdom that the higher academic performance of students in small schools is driven by a better learning environment.

KW - Learning environment

KW - New small and old small schools

KW - School climate

KW - Small schools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964388264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964388264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 272

EP - 290

JO - Economics of Education Review

JF - Economics of Education Review

SN - 0272-7757

ER -