Arbitrary metrics in psychology

Hart Blanton, James Jaccard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many psychological tests have arbitrary metrics but are appropriate for testing psychological theories. Metric arbitrariness is a concern, however, when researchers wish to draw inferences about the true, absolute standing of a group or individual on the latent psychological dimension being measured. The authors illustrate this in the context of 2 case studies in which psychologists need to develop inventories with nonarbitrary metrics. One example comes from social psychology, where researchers have begun using the Implicit Association Test to provide the lay public with feedback about their "hidden biases" via popular Internet Web pages. The other example comes from clinical psychology, where researchers often wish to evaluate the real-world importance of interventions. As the authors show, both pursuits require researchers to conduct formal research that makes their metrics nonarbitrary by linking test scores to meaningful real-world events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-41
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Psychology
Psychological Theory
Clinical Psychology
Social Psychology
Psychological Tests
Internet
Equipment and Supplies
Research
World Wide Web
Wishes
Real World

Keywords

  • Clinical significance
  • Implicit Association Test
  • Prejudice
  • Reliability
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Arbitrary metrics in psychology. / Blanton, Hart; Jaccard, James.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 61, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 27-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blanton, Hart ; Jaccard, James. / Arbitrary metrics in psychology. In: American Psychologist. 2006 ; Vol. 61, No. 1. pp. 27-41.
@article{ef0c658fb29f4060b715871bc357cc5c,
title = "Arbitrary metrics in psychology",
abstract = "Many psychological tests have arbitrary metrics but are appropriate for testing psychological theories. Metric arbitrariness is a concern, however, when researchers wish to draw inferences about the true, absolute standing of a group or individual on the latent psychological dimension being measured. The authors illustrate this in the context of 2 case studies in which psychologists need to develop inventories with nonarbitrary metrics. One example comes from social psychology, where researchers have begun using the Implicit Association Test to provide the lay public with feedback about their {"}hidden biases{"} via popular Internet Web pages. The other example comes from clinical psychology, where researchers often wish to evaluate the real-world importance of interventions. As the authors show, both pursuits require researchers to conduct formal research that makes their metrics nonarbitrary by linking test scores to meaningful real-world events.",
keywords = "Clinical significance, Implicit Association Test, Prejudice, Reliability, Validity",
author = "Hart Blanton and James Jaccard",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "27--41",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arbitrary metrics in psychology

AU - Blanton, Hart

AU - Jaccard, James

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Many psychological tests have arbitrary metrics but are appropriate for testing psychological theories. Metric arbitrariness is a concern, however, when researchers wish to draw inferences about the true, absolute standing of a group or individual on the latent psychological dimension being measured. The authors illustrate this in the context of 2 case studies in which psychologists need to develop inventories with nonarbitrary metrics. One example comes from social psychology, where researchers have begun using the Implicit Association Test to provide the lay public with feedback about their "hidden biases" via popular Internet Web pages. The other example comes from clinical psychology, where researchers often wish to evaluate the real-world importance of interventions. As the authors show, both pursuits require researchers to conduct formal research that makes their metrics nonarbitrary by linking test scores to meaningful real-world events.

AB - Many psychological tests have arbitrary metrics but are appropriate for testing psychological theories. Metric arbitrariness is a concern, however, when researchers wish to draw inferences about the true, absolute standing of a group or individual on the latent psychological dimension being measured. The authors illustrate this in the context of 2 case studies in which psychologists need to develop inventories with nonarbitrary metrics. One example comes from social psychology, where researchers have begun using the Implicit Association Test to provide the lay public with feedback about their "hidden biases" via popular Internet Web pages. The other example comes from clinical psychology, where researchers often wish to evaluate the real-world importance of interventions. As the authors show, both pursuits require researchers to conduct formal research that makes their metrics nonarbitrary by linking test scores to meaningful real-world events.

KW - Clinical significance

KW - Implicit Association Test

KW - Prejudice

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31144463367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31144463367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27

DO - 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 27

EP - 41

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 1

ER -