Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces

Adam Kestian, Agnieszka Roginska

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This work presents an extension of the Acoustic Pulse Reflectometry (APR) methodology that was previously used to obtain the characteristics of smaller acoustic spaces. Upon reconstructing larger spaces, the geometric configuration and characteristics of the measurement apparatus can be directly related to the clarity of the results. This paper describes and compares three measurement setups and apparatus configurations. The advantages and disadvantages of each methodology are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAudio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008
Pages848-853
Number of pages6
Volume2
StatePublished - 2008
Event125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008 - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: Oct 2 2008Oct 5 2008

Other

Other125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008
CountryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period10/2/0810/5/08

Fingerprint

Acoustics
methodology
Reflectometry
clarity
Configuration
acoustics
Methodology
configurations
pulses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Kestian, A., & Roginska, A. (2008). Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces. In Audio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008 (Vol. 2, pp. 848-853)

Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces. / Kestian, Adam; Roginska, Agnieszka.

Audio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008. Vol. 2 2008. p. 848-853.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Kestian, A & Roginska, A 2008, Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces. in Audio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008. vol. 2, pp. 848-853, 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008, San Francisco, CA, United States, 10/2/08.
Kestian A, Roginska A. Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces. In Audio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008. Vol. 2. 2008. p. 848-853
Kestian, Adam ; Roginska, Agnieszka. / Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces. Audio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008. Vol. 2 2008. pp. 848-853
@inproceedings{b06d4c9bb212480782c6d4972339a62b,
title = "Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces",
abstract = "This work presents an extension of the Acoustic Pulse Reflectometry (APR) methodology that was previously used to obtain the characteristics of smaller acoustic spaces. Upon reconstructing larger spaces, the geometric configuration and characteristics of the measurement apparatus can be directly related to the clarity of the results. This paper describes and compares three measurement setups and apparatus configurations. The advantages and disadvantages of each methodology are discussed.",
author = "Adam Kestian and Agnieszka Roginska",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781605607122",
volume = "2",
pages = "848--853",
booktitle = "Audio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Apparatus comparison for the characterization of spaces

AU - Kestian, Adam

AU - Roginska, Agnieszka

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This work presents an extension of the Acoustic Pulse Reflectometry (APR) methodology that was previously used to obtain the characteristics of smaller acoustic spaces. Upon reconstructing larger spaces, the geometric configuration and characteristics of the measurement apparatus can be directly related to the clarity of the results. This paper describes and compares three measurement setups and apparatus configurations. The advantages and disadvantages of each methodology are discussed.

AB - This work presents an extension of the Acoustic Pulse Reflectometry (APR) methodology that was previously used to obtain the characteristics of smaller acoustic spaces. Upon reconstructing larger spaces, the geometric configuration and characteristics of the measurement apparatus can be directly related to the clarity of the results. This paper describes and compares three measurement setups and apparatus configurations. The advantages and disadvantages of each methodology are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866503865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866503865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781605607122

VL - 2

SP - 848

EP - 853

BT - Audio Engineering Society - 125th Audio Engineering Society Convention 2008

ER -