Anxiety perseverance in intergroup interaction

When incidental explanations backfire

Tessa West, Adam R. Pearson, Chadly Stern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Intergroup interactions are often anxiety provoking, and this can lead members of both majority and minority groups to avoid contact. Whereas negative consequences of experiencing intergroup anxiety are well documented, the role of perceived anxiety has received substantially less theoretical and empirical attention. We demonstrate in 3 experiments that the perception of anxiety in others can undermine intergroup interactions even when the anxiety can be attributed to a source that is unrelated to the interaction. Participants who learned that a cross-race partner's anxiety could be attributed to an upcoming evaluation (Study 1) or a stimulant (i.e., caffeine, Studies 2 and 3) expressed less interest in continuing an interaction (Studies 1 and 2), showed less self-disclosure (Study 2), and increased physical distance between themselves and their partner (Study 3) than did those given no source information and participants who interacted with a same-race partner. Moreover, compared to control participants, perceivers who were given an incidental explanation for their partner's anxiety perceived outgroup, but not ingroup, partners as more anxious (Studies 1 and 3) and showed heightened accessibility of anxiety words (Study 3), indicating that incidental source information enhanced accessibility of intergroup (but not intragroup) anxiety at early stages of information processing. Theoretical and practical implications for combating paradoxical effects of perceived anxiety in intergroup interactions are considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)825-843
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume107
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Anxiety
anxiety
interaction
Self Disclosure
Minority Groups
outgroup
Caffeine
Automatic Data Processing
information processing
minority
contact
experiment
evaluation

Keywords

  • Intergroup anxiety
  • Intergroup relations
  • Interpersonal contact
  • Social inference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Anxiety perseverance in intergroup interaction : When incidental explanations backfire. / West, Tessa; Pearson, Adam R.; Stern, Chadly.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 107, No. 5, 2014, p. 825-843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5155eddab4c34148a58bf663a6b4c12e,
title = "Anxiety perseverance in intergroup interaction: When incidental explanations backfire",
abstract = "Intergroup interactions are often anxiety provoking, and this can lead members of both majority and minority groups to avoid contact. Whereas negative consequences of experiencing intergroup anxiety are well documented, the role of perceived anxiety has received substantially less theoretical and empirical attention. We demonstrate in 3 experiments that the perception of anxiety in others can undermine intergroup interactions even when the anxiety can be attributed to a source that is unrelated to the interaction. Participants who learned that a cross-race partner's anxiety could be attributed to an upcoming evaluation (Study 1) or a stimulant (i.e., caffeine, Studies 2 and 3) expressed less interest in continuing an interaction (Studies 1 and 2), showed less self-disclosure (Study 2), and increased physical distance between themselves and their partner (Study 3) than did those given no source information and participants who interacted with a same-race partner. Moreover, compared to control participants, perceivers who were given an incidental explanation for their partner's anxiety perceived outgroup, but not ingroup, partners as more anxious (Studies 1 and 3) and showed heightened accessibility of anxiety words (Study 3), indicating that incidental source information enhanced accessibility of intergroup (but not intragroup) anxiety at early stages of information processing. Theoretical and practical implications for combating paradoxical effects of perceived anxiety in intergroup interactions are considered.",
keywords = "Intergroup anxiety, Intergroup relations, Interpersonal contact, Social inference",
author = "Tessa West and Pearson, {Adam R.} and Chadly Stern",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1037/a0037941",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "825--843",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anxiety perseverance in intergroup interaction

T2 - When incidental explanations backfire

AU - West, Tessa

AU - Pearson, Adam R.

AU - Stern, Chadly

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Intergroup interactions are often anxiety provoking, and this can lead members of both majority and minority groups to avoid contact. Whereas negative consequences of experiencing intergroup anxiety are well documented, the role of perceived anxiety has received substantially less theoretical and empirical attention. We demonstrate in 3 experiments that the perception of anxiety in others can undermine intergroup interactions even when the anxiety can be attributed to a source that is unrelated to the interaction. Participants who learned that a cross-race partner's anxiety could be attributed to an upcoming evaluation (Study 1) or a stimulant (i.e., caffeine, Studies 2 and 3) expressed less interest in continuing an interaction (Studies 1 and 2), showed less self-disclosure (Study 2), and increased physical distance between themselves and their partner (Study 3) than did those given no source information and participants who interacted with a same-race partner. Moreover, compared to control participants, perceivers who were given an incidental explanation for their partner's anxiety perceived outgroup, but not ingroup, partners as more anxious (Studies 1 and 3) and showed heightened accessibility of anxiety words (Study 3), indicating that incidental source information enhanced accessibility of intergroup (but not intragroup) anxiety at early stages of information processing. Theoretical and practical implications for combating paradoxical effects of perceived anxiety in intergroup interactions are considered.

AB - Intergroup interactions are often anxiety provoking, and this can lead members of both majority and minority groups to avoid contact. Whereas negative consequences of experiencing intergroup anxiety are well documented, the role of perceived anxiety has received substantially less theoretical and empirical attention. We demonstrate in 3 experiments that the perception of anxiety in others can undermine intergroup interactions even when the anxiety can be attributed to a source that is unrelated to the interaction. Participants who learned that a cross-race partner's anxiety could be attributed to an upcoming evaluation (Study 1) or a stimulant (i.e., caffeine, Studies 2 and 3) expressed less interest in continuing an interaction (Studies 1 and 2), showed less self-disclosure (Study 2), and increased physical distance between themselves and their partner (Study 3) than did those given no source information and participants who interacted with a same-race partner. Moreover, compared to control participants, perceivers who were given an incidental explanation for their partner's anxiety perceived outgroup, but not ingroup, partners as more anxious (Studies 1 and 3) and showed heightened accessibility of anxiety words (Study 3), indicating that incidental source information enhanced accessibility of intergroup (but not intragroup) anxiety at early stages of information processing. Theoretical and practical implications for combating paradoxical effects of perceived anxiety in intergroup interactions are considered.

KW - Intergroup anxiety

KW - Intergroup relations

KW - Interpersonal contact

KW - Social inference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925443760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925443760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0037941

DO - 10.1037/a0037941

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 825

EP - 843

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 5

ER -