Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies

John Jost, Orsolya Hunyady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

According to system justification theory, there is a psychological motive to defend and justify the status quo. There are both dispositional antecedents (e.g., need for closure, openness to experience) and situational antecedents (e.g., system threat, mortality salience) of the tendency to embrace system-justifying ideologies. Consequences of system justification sometimes differ for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups, with the former experiencing increased and the latter decreased self-esteem, well-being, and in-group favoritism. In accordance with the palliative function of system justification, endorsement of such ideologies is associated with reduced negative affect for everyone, as well as weakened support for social change and redistribution of resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-265
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Social Change
Self Concept
Psychology
Mortality

Keywords

  • Conservatism
  • Ideology
  • Status quo
  • System justification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. / Jost, John; Hunyady, Orsolya.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 14, No. 5, 10.2005, p. 260-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8d42881d77e749cd989a6baedff63929,
title = "Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies",
abstract = "According to system justification theory, there is a psychological motive to defend and justify the status quo. There are both dispositional antecedents (e.g., need for closure, openness to experience) and situational antecedents (e.g., system threat, mortality salience) of the tendency to embrace system-justifying ideologies. Consequences of system justification sometimes differ for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups, with the former experiencing increased and the latter decreased self-esteem, well-being, and in-group favoritism. In accordance with the palliative function of system justification, endorsement of such ideologies is associated with reduced negative affect for everyone, as well as weakened support for social change and redistribution of resources.",
keywords = "Conservatism, Ideology, Status quo, System justification",
author = "John Jost and Orsolya Hunyady",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "260--265",
journal = "Current Directions in Psychological Science",
issn = "0963-7214",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies

AU - Jost, John

AU - Hunyady, Orsolya

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - According to system justification theory, there is a psychological motive to defend and justify the status quo. There are both dispositional antecedents (e.g., need for closure, openness to experience) and situational antecedents (e.g., system threat, mortality salience) of the tendency to embrace system-justifying ideologies. Consequences of system justification sometimes differ for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups, with the former experiencing increased and the latter decreased self-esteem, well-being, and in-group favoritism. In accordance with the palliative function of system justification, endorsement of such ideologies is associated with reduced negative affect for everyone, as well as weakened support for social change and redistribution of resources.

AB - According to system justification theory, there is a psychological motive to defend and justify the status quo. There are both dispositional antecedents (e.g., need for closure, openness to experience) and situational antecedents (e.g., system threat, mortality salience) of the tendency to embrace system-justifying ideologies. Consequences of system justification sometimes differ for members of advantaged versus disadvantaged groups, with the former experiencing increased and the latter decreased self-esteem, well-being, and in-group favoritism. In accordance with the palliative function of system justification, endorsement of such ideologies is associated with reduced negative affect for everyone, as well as weakened support for social change and redistribution of resources.

KW - Conservatism

KW - Ideology

KW - Status quo

KW - System justification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27544481081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27544481081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x

DO - 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27544481081

VL - 14

SP - 260

EP - 265

JO - Current Directions in Psychological Science

JF - Current Directions in Psychological Science

SN - 0963-7214

IS - 5

ER -