Anger and Authoritarianism Mediate the Effects of Fear on Support for the Far Right—What Vasilopoulos et al. (2019) Really Found

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In an important study of popular support for the National Front following the November 13, 2015 terrorist attacks in France, Vasilopoulos, Marcus, Valentino, and Foucault () argue that (1) anger—rather than fear—explains support for the Far Right and (2) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is negative, rather than positive, as previous work (including my own) would suggest. However, these conclusions are based on statistical models that adjust for anger (but no other emotional variables) when investigating the effects of fear, and the results indicate the presence of a suppression effect. Following a collegial exchange with the authors, I share evidence (which they provided) that (1) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is in fact positive and significant (rather than negative) and (2) anger and authoritarianism both mediate the effect of fear on support for the Far Right. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPolitical Psychology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
Anger
authoritarianism
anger
Fear
anxiety
National Front
Statistical Models
France
suppression
Far Right
evidence

Keywords

  • anger
  • authoritarianism
  • emotion
  • fear
  • right-wing extremism
  • terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{ec12672256594f6dbf9ae6ae8b654a0a,
title = "Anger and Authoritarianism Mediate the Effects of Fear on Support for the Far Right—What Vasilopoulos et al. (2019) Really Found",
abstract = "In an important study of popular support for the National Front following the November 13, 2015 terrorist attacks in France, Vasilopoulos, Marcus, Valentino, and Foucault () argue that (1) anger—rather than fear—explains support for the Far Right and (2) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is negative, rather than positive, as previous work (including my own) would suggest. However, these conclusions are based on statistical models that adjust for anger (but no other emotional variables) when investigating the effects of fear, and the results indicate the presence of a suppression effect. Following a collegial exchange with the authors, I share evidence (which they provided) that (1) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is in fact positive and significant (rather than negative) and (2) anger and authoritarianism both mediate the effect of fear on support for the Far Right. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.",
keywords = "anger, authoritarianism, emotion, fear, right-wing extremism, terrorism",
author = "John Jost",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12567",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anger and Authoritarianism Mediate the Effects of Fear on Support for the Far Right—What Vasilopoulos et al. (2019) Really Found

AU - Jost, John

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In an important study of popular support for the National Front following the November 13, 2015 terrorist attacks in France, Vasilopoulos, Marcus, Valentino, and Foucault () argue that (1) anger—rather than fear—explains support for the Far Right and (2) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is negative, rather than positive, as previous work (including my own) would suggest. However, these conclusions are based on statistical models that adjust for anger (but no other emotional variables) when investigating the effects of fear, and the results indicate the presence of a suppression effect. Following a collegial exchange with the authors, I share evidence (which they provided) that (1) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is in fact positive and significant (rather than negative) and (2) anger and authoritarianism both mediate the effect of fear on support for the Far Right. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

AB - In an important study of popular support for the National Front following the November 13, 2015 terrorist attacks in France, Vasilopoulos, Marcus, Valentino, and Foucault () argue that (1) anger—rather than fear—explains support for the Far Right and (2) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is negative, rather than positive, as previous work (including my own) would suggest. However, these conclusions are based on statistical models that adjust for anger (but no other emotional variables) when investigating the effects of fear, and the results indicate the presence of a suppression effect. Following a collegial exchange with the authors, I share evidence (which they provided) that (1) the effect of fear on support for the Far Right is in fact positive and significant (rather than negative) and (2) anger and authoritarianism both mediate the effect of fear on support for the Far Right. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

KW - anger

KW - authoritarianism

KW - emotion

KW - fear

KW - right-wing extremism

KW - terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060956389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060956389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12567

DO - 10.1111/pops.12567

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060956389

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

ER -