An O'Brien-Fleming sequential trial for comparing three treatments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We consider a sequential procedure for comparing three treatments with the goal of ultimately selecting the best treatment. This procedure starts with a sequential test to detect an overall treatment difference and eliminates the apparently inferior treatment if this test rejects the equality of the treatments. It then proceeds with a sequential test of the remaining two treatments. We base these sequential tests on the stopping boundaries popularized by O'Brien and Fleming. Our procedure is similar in structure to that used by Siegmund in conjunction with modified repeated significance tests. We compare the performances of the two procedures via a simulation experiment. We derive analytic approximations for an error probability, the power and the expected sample size of our procedure, which we compare to simulated values. Furthermore, we propose a modification of the procedure for the comparison of a standard treatment with experimental treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1765-1791
Number of pages27
JournalAnnals of Statistics
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Sequential Test
Repeated Significance Test
Sequential Procedure
Error Probability
Simulation Experiment
Equality
Sample Size
Eliminate
Approximation
Sequential test

Keywords

  • Boundary crossing
  • Ranking procedure
  • Repeated significance test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

An O'Brien-Fleming sequential trial for comparing three treatments. / Betensky, Rebecca.

In: Annals of Statistics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.01.1996, p. 1765-1791.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e5b3264ffa448f79cb62647ab966422,
title = "An O'Brien-Fleming sequential trial for comparing three treatments",
abstract = "We consider a sequential procedure for comparing three treatments with the goal of ultimately selecting the best treatment. This procedure starts with a sequential test to detect an overall treatment difference and eliminates the apparently inferior treatment if this test rejects the equality of the treatments. It then proceeds with a sequential test of the remaining two treatments. We base these sequential tests on the stopping boundaries popularized by O'Brien and Fleming. Our procedure is similar in structure to that used by Siegmund in conjunction with modified repeated significance tests. We compare the performances of the two procedures via a simulation experiment. We derive analytic approximations for an error probability, the power and the expected sample size of our procedure, which we compare to simulated values. Furthermore, we propose a modification of the procedure for the comparison of a standard treatment with experimental treatments.",
keywords = "Boundary crossing, Ranking procedure, Repeated significance test",
author = "Rebecca Betensky",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1214/aos/1032298294",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1765--1791",
journal = "Annals of Statistics",
issn = "0090-5364",
publisher = "Institute of Mathematical Statistics",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An O'Brien-Fleming sequential trial for comparing three treatments

AU - Betensky, Rebecca

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - We consider a sequential procedure for comparing three treatments with the goal of ultimately selecting the best treatment. This procedure starts with a sequential test to detect an overall treatment difference and eliminates the apparently inferior treatment if this test rejects the equality of the treatments. It then proceeds with a sequential test of the remaining two treatments. We base these sequential tests on the stopping boundaries popularized by O'Brien and Fleming. Our procedure is similar in structure to that used by Siegmund in conjunction with modified repeated significance tests. We compare the performances of the two procedures via a simulation experiment. We derive analytic approximations for an error probability, the power and the expected sample size of our procedure, which we compare to simulated values. Furthermore, we propose a modification of the procedure for the comparison of a standard treatment with experimental treatments.

AB - We consider a sequential procedure for comparing three treatments with the goal of ultimately selecting the best treatment. This procedure starts with a sequential test to detect an overall treatment difference and eliminates the apparently inferior treatment if this test rejects the equality of the treatments. It then proceeds with a sequential test of the remaining two treatments. We base these sequential tests on the stopping boundaries popularized by O'Brien and Fleming. Our procedure is similar in structure to that used by Siegmund in conjunction with modified repeated significance tests. We compare the performances of the two procedures via a simulation experiment. We derive analytic approximations for an error probability, the power and the expected sample size of our procedure, which we compare to simulated values. Furthermore, we propose a modification of the procedure for the comparison of a standard treatment with experimental treatments.

KW - Boundary crossing

KW - Ranking procedure

KW - Repeated significance test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030375044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030375044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1214/aos/1032298294

DO - 10.1214/aos/1032298294

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030375044

VL - 24

SP - 1765

EP - 1791

JO - Annals of Statistics

JF - Annals of Statistics

SN - 0090-5364

IS - 4

ER -