An Integrative Review of the Hands-Free Technique in the OR

Pamela B. Linzer, Sean Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sharps injury rates are proportionally higher in perioperative areas than in other practice settings. The hands-free technique (HFT) has been shown to decrease the hazards of sharps injuries when passing sharps during surgery. We reviewed and synthesized research studies regarding compliance with the HFT and factors facilitating its use using a key word search of online databases and a secondary search of references. We reviewed English language studies published since 2001 regarding HFT compliance rates or related factors using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines. We found 14 articles reporting a wide range of HFT compliance rates (ie, 5% to 84%), which identified that a number of organizational factors and health care workers’ perceptions of infection risks influenced the use of the HFT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-218.e6
JournalAORN Journal
Volume106
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Hand
Needlestick Injuries
Evidence-Based Practice
Practice Guidelines
Nursing
Language
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Infection
Research

Keywords

  • hands-free technique (HFT)
  • needlestick injury
  • neutral zone
  • safety compliance
  • sharps injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medical–Surgical

Cite this

An Integrative Review of the Hands-Free Technique in the OR. / Linzer, Pamela B.; Clarke, Sean.

In: AORN Journal, Vol. 106, No. 3, 01.09.2017, p. 211-218.e6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Linzer, Pamela B. ; Clarke, Sean. / An Integrative Review of the Hands-Free Technique in the OR. In: AORN Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 106, No. 3. pp. 211-218.e6.
@article{54af2502b40542eea787c9bc62f3d4d9,
title = "An Integrative Review of the Hands-Free Technique in the OR",
abstract = "Sharps injury rates are proportionally higher in perioperative areas than in other practice settings. The hands-free technique (HFT) has been shown to decrease the hazards of sharps injuries when passing sharps during surgery. We reviewed and synthesized research studies regarding compliance with the HFT and factors facilitating its use using a key word search of online databases and a secondary search of references. We reviewed English language studies published since 2001 regarding HFT compliance rates or related factors using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines. We found 14 articles reporting a wide range of HFT compliance rates (ie, 5{\%} to 84{\%}), which identified that a number of organizational factors and health care workers’ perceptions of infection risks influenced the use of the HFT.",
keywords = "hands-free technique (HFT), needlestick injury, neutral zone, safety compliance, sharps injury",
author = "Linzer, {Pamela B.} and Sean Clarke",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.aorn.2017.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "211--218.e6",
journal = "AORN Journal",
issn = "0001-2092",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Integrative Review of the Hands-Free Technique in the OR

AU - Linzer, Pamela B.

AU - Clarke, Sean

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Sharps injury rates are proportionally higher in perioperative areas than in other practice settings. The hands-free technique (HFT) has been shown to decrease the hazards of sharps injuries when passing sharps during surgery. We reviewed and synthesized research studies regarding compliance with the HFT and factors facilitating its use using a key word search of online databases and a secondary search of references. We reviewed English language studies published since 2001 regarding HFT compliance rates or related factors using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines. We found 14 articles reporting a wide range of HFT compliance rates (ie, 5% to 84%), which identified that a number of organizational factors and health care workers’ perceptions of infection risks influenced the use of the HFT.

AB - Sharps injury rates are proportionally higher in perioperative areas than in other practice settings. The hands-free technique (HFT) has been shown to decrease the hazards of sharps injuries when passing sharps during surgery. We reviewed and synthesized research studies regarding compliance with the HFT and factors facilitating its use using a key word search of online databases and a secondary search of references. We reviewed English language studies published since 2001 regarding HFT compliance rates or related factors using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines. We found 14 articles reporting a wide range of HFT compliance rates (ie, 5% to 84%), which identified that a number of organizational factors and health care workers’ perceptions of infection risks influenced the use of the HFT.

KW - hands-free technique (HFT)

KW - needlestick injury

KW - neutral zone

KW - safety compliance

KW - sharps injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028995076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028995076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aorn.2017.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.aorn.2017.07.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 28865631

AN - SCOPUS:85028995076

VL - 106

SP - 211-218.e6

JO - AORN Journal

JF - AORN Journal

SN - 0001-2092

IS - 3

ER -