An in vitro investigation of the antimicrobial activity of an herbal mouthrinse

James Kaim, J. Gultz, L. Do, W. Scherer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of one prescription and two commercially available over-the-counter mouthrinses and positive and negative controls against bacteria commonly found in the oral cavity. The bacteria used in this study were Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces viscosus. Sterile discs which were treated with the mouthrinses were placed on agar plates along with the controls. Zones of microbial inhibition were measured in millimeters after 48 hours. The results indicated that all of the mouthrinses demonstrated antimicrobial activity against the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy® mouthrinse, containing natural ingredients, produced the largest zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Listerine® against all three of the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy mouthrinse produced larger zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Peridex® against two of the three bacteria tested, and produced similar zones of inhibition against the third bacteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-48
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Dentistry
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Bacteria
Mouth
Gingiva
Actinomyces viscosus
Streptococcus sanguis
Streptococcus mutans
Agar
Prescriptions
In Vitro Techniques
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

An in vitro investigation of the antimicrobial activity of an herbal mouthrinse. / Kaim, James; Gultz, J.; Do, L.; Scherer, W.

In: Journal of Clinical Dentistry, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1998, p. 46-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a32ae552f61f4d99b42c4905b4c00ff6,
title = "An in vitro investigation of the antimicrobial activity of an herbal mouthrinse",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of one prescription and two commercially available over-the-counter mouthrinses and positive and negative controls against bacteria commonly found in the oral cavity. The bacteria used in this study were Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces viscosus. Sterile discs which were treated with the mouthrinses were placed on agar plates along with the controls. Zones of microbial inhibition were measured in millimeters after 48 hours. The results indicated that all of the mouthrinses demonstrated antimicrobial activity against the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy{\circledR} mouthrinse, containing natural ingredients, produced the largest zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Listerine{\circledR} against all three of the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy mouthrinse produced larger zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Peridex{\circledR} against two of the three bacteria tested, and produced similar zones of inhibition against the third bacteria.",
author = "James Kaim and J. Gultz and L. Do and W. Scherer",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "46--48",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Dentistry",
issn = "0895-8831",
publisher = "Professional Audience Communications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An in vitro investigation of the antimicrobial activity of an herbal mouthrinse

AU - Kaim, James

AU - Gultz, J.

AU - Do, L.

AU - Scherer, W.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of one prescription and two commercially available over-the-counter mouthrinses and positive and negative controls against bacteria commonly found in the oral cavity. The bacteria used in this study were Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces viscosus. Sterile discs which were treated with the mouthrinses were placed on agar plates along with the controls. Zones of microbial inhibition were measured in millimeters after 48 hours. The results indicated that all of the mouthrinses demonstrated antimicrobial activity against the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy® mouthrinse, containing natural ingredients, produced the largest zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Listerine® against all three of the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy mouthrinse produced larger zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Peridex® against two of the three bacteria tested, and produced similar zones of inhibition against the third bacteria.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine the antimicrobial activity of one prescription and two commercially available over-the-counter mouthrinses and positive and negative controls against bacteria commonly found in the oral cavity. The bacteria used in this study were Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces viscosus. Sterile discs which were treated with the mouthrinses were placed on agar plates along with the controls. Zones of microbial inhibition were measured in millimeters after 48 hours. The results indicated that all of the mouthrinses demonstrated antimicrobial activity against the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy® mouthrinse, containing natural ingredients, produced the largest zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Listerine® against all three of the bacteria tested. Herbal Mouth and Gum Therapy mouthrinse produced larger zones of microbial inhibition when compared to Peridex® against two of the three bacteria tested, and produced similar zones of inhibition against the third bacteria.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032242717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032242717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 46

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Clinical Dentistry

JF - Journal of Clinical Dentistry

SN - 0895-8831

IS - 2

ER -