An Eye-tracking study of receptive verb knowledge in toddlers

Matthew James Valleau, Haruka Konishi, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Sudha Arunachalam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We examined receptive verb knowledge in 22-to 24-month-old toddlers with a dynamic video eye-tracking test. The primary goal of the study was to examine the utility of eye-gaze measures that are commonly used to study noun knowledge for studying verb knowledge. Method: Forty typically developing toddlers participated. They viewed 2 videos side by side (e.g., girl clapping, same girl stretching) and were asked to find one of them (e.g., “Where is she clapping?”). Their eye-gaze, recorded by a Tobii T60XL eye-tracking system, was analyzed as a measure of their knowledge of the verb meanings. Noun trials were included as controls. We examined correlations between eye-gaze measures and score on the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 1994), a standard parent report measure of expressive vocabulary to see how well various eye-gaze measures predicted CDI score. Results: A common measure of knowledge—a 15% increase in looking time to the target video from a baseline phase to the test phase—did correlate with CDI score but operationalized differently for verbs than for nouns. A 2nd common measure, latency of 1st look to the target, correlated with CDI score for nouns, as in previous work, but did not for verbs. A 3rd measure, fixation density, correlated for both nouns and verbs, although the correlation went in different directions. Conclusions: The dynamic nature of videos depicting verb knowledge results in differences in eye-gaze as compared to static images depicting nouns. An eye-tracking assessment of verb knowledge is worthwhile to develop. However, the particular dependent measures used may be different than those used for static images and nouns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2917-2933
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume61
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

video
vocabulary
parents
Verbs
Toddlers
Nouns
Vocabulary
Eye Gaze
Equipment and Supplies
Common Measure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

An Eye-tracking study of receptive verb knowledge in toddlers. / Valleau, Matthew James; Konishi, Haruka; Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy; Arunachalam, Sudha.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 61, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 2917-2933.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valleau, Matthew James ; Konishi, Haruka ; Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy ; Arunachalam, Sudha. / An Eye-tracking study of receptive verb knowledge in toddlers. In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2018 ; Vol. 61, No. 12. pp. 2917-2933.
@article{8c715b7d1b064ff0ab950e6b0555e7f6,
title = "An Eye-tracking study of receptive verb knowledge in toddlers",
abstract = "Purpose: We examined receptive verb knowledge in 22-to 24-month-old toddlers with a dynamic video eye-tracking test. The primary goal of the study was to examine the utility of eye-gaze measures that are commonly used to study noun knowledge for studying verb knowledge. Method: Forty typically developing toddlers participated. They viewed 2 videos side by side (e.g., girl clapping, same girl stretching) and were asked to find one of them (e.g., “Where is she clapping?”). Their eye-gaze, recorded by a Tobii T60XL eye-tracking system, was analyzed as a measure of their knowledge of the verb meanings. Noun trials were included as controls. We examined correlations between eye-gaze measures and score on the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 1994), a standard parent report measure of expressive vocabulary to see how well various eye-gaze measures predicted CDI score. Results: A common measure of knowledge—a 15{\%} increase in looking time to the target video from a baseline phase to the test phase—did correlate with CDI score but operationalized differently for verbs than for nouns. A 2nd common measure, latency of 1st look to the target, correlated with CDI score for nouns, as in previous work, but did not for verbs. A 3rd measure, fixation density, correlated for both nouns and verbs, although the correlation went in different directions. Conclusions: The dynamic nature of videos depicting verb knowledge results in differences in eye-gaze as compared to static images depicting nouns. An eye-tracking assessment of verb knowledge is worthwhile to develop. However, the particular dependent measures used may be different than those used for static images and nouns.",
author = "Valleau, {Matthew James} and Haruka Konishi and Golinkoff, {Roberta Michnick} and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek and Sudha Arunachalam",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "2917--2933",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Eye-tracking study of receptive verb knowledge in toddlers

AU - Valleau, Matthew James

AU - Konishi, Haruka

AU - Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick

AU - Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy

AU - Arunachalam, Sudha

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Purpose: We examined receptive verb knowledge in 22-to 24-month-old toddlers with a dynamic video eye-tracking test. The primary goal of the study was to examine the utility of eye-gaze measures that are commonly used to study noun knowledge for studying verb knowledge. Method: Forty typically developing toddlers participated. They viewed 2 videos side by side (e.g., girl clapping, same girl stretching) and were asked to find one of them (e.g., “Where is she clapping?”). Their eye-gaze, recorded by a Tobii T60XL eye-tracking system, was analyzed as a measure of their knowledge of the verb meanings. Noun trials were included as controls. We examined correlations between eye-gaze measures and score on the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 1994), a standard parent report measure of expressive vocabulary to see how well various eye-gaze measures predicted CDI score. Results: A common measure of knowledge—a 15% increase in looking time to the target video from a baseline phase to the test phase—did correlate with CDI score but operationalized differently for verbs than for nouns. A 2nd common measure, latency of 1st look to the target, correlated with CDI score for nouns, as in previous work, but did not for verbs. A 3rd measure, fixation density, correlated for both nouns and verbs, although the correlation went in different directions. Conclusions: The dynamic nature of videos depicting verb knowledge results in differences in eye-gaze as compared to static images depicting nouns. An eye-tracking assessment of verb knowledge is worthwhile to develop. However, the particular dependent measures used may be different than those used for static images and nouns.

AB - Purpose: We examined receptive verb knowledge in 22-to 24-month-old toddlers with a dynamic video eye-tracking test. The primary goal of the study was to examine the utility of eye-gaze measures that are commonly used to study noun knowledge for studying verb knowledge. Method: Forty typically developing toddlers participated. They viewed 2 videos side by side (e.g., girl clapping, same girl stretching) and were asked to find one of them (e.g., “Where is she clapping?”). Their eye-gaze, recorded by a Tobii T60XL eye-tracking system, was analyzed as a measure of their knowledge of the verb meanings. Noun trials were included as controls. We examined correlations between eye-gaze measures and score on the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 1994), a standard parent report measure of expressive vocabulary to see how well various eye-gaze measures predicted CDI score. Results: A common measure of knowledge—a 15% increase in looking time to the target video from a baseline phase to the test phase—did correlate with CDI score but operationalized differently for verbs than for nouns. A 2nd common measure, latency of 1st look to the target, correlated with CDI score for nouns, as in previous work, but did not for verbs. A 3rd measure, fixation density, correlated for both nouns and verbs, although the correlation went in different directions. Conclusions: The dynamic nature of videos depicting verb knowledge results in differences in eye-gaze as compared to static images depicting nouns. An eye-tracking assessment of verb knowledge is worthwhile to develop. However, the particular dependent measures used may be different than those used for static images and nouns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058540288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058540288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363

DO - 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 2917

EP - 2933

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 12

ER -