An evaluation of three blood pressure methods in a stabilized acute trauma population

Elizabeth M. Norman, Diane Cadaleta, C. Clayton Griffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Blood pressure values were evaluated in 30 acute adult trauma patients using two indirect methods, the bell and diaphragm components of the stethoscope, and one direct arterial mediod. Kl, K4, and K5 measurements were taken 4 to 72 hours (M = 30) after admission when vital signs had stabilized. Data were collected using a random-zero (KL) sphygmomanometer for indirect blood pressure and radial intraarterial cannula for direct blood pressure. The sequence of measurement was randomized and variables shown to alter blood pressure values were controlled. There was no overall significant difference in Kl, K4, and-K5 blood pressures among the three methods. These results suggest that when clinicians monitor variables such as the frequency response of arterial lines and peripheral vascular resistance, indirect blood pressure methods are reliable for use with stabilized trauma patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-89
Number of pages4
JournalNursing Research
Volume40
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure
Wounds and Injuries
Population
Vascular Resistance
Stethoscopes
Sphygmomanometers
Vascular Access Devices
Vital Signs
Diaphragm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

An evaluation of three blood pressure methods in a stabilized acute trauma population. / Norman, Elizabeth M.; Cadaleta, Diane; Clayton Griffin, C.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1991, p. 86-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Norman, Elizabeth M. ; Cadaleta, Diane ; Clayton Griffin, C. / An evaluation of three blood pressure methods in a stabilized acute trauma population. In: Nursing Research. 1991 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 86-89.
@article{26d1ddd2a63648dfa963e20541f16c09,
title = "An evaluation of three blood pressure methods in a stabilized acute trauma population",
abstract = "Blood pressure values were evaluated in 30 acute adult trauma patients using two indirect methods, the bell and diaphragm components of the stethoscope, and one direct arterial mediod. Kl, K4, and K5 measurements were taken 4 to 72 hours (M = 30) after admission when vital signs had stabilized. Data were collected using a random-zero (KL) sphygmomanometer for indirect blood pressure and radial intraarterial cannula for direct blood pressure. The sequence of measurement was randomized and variables shown to alter blood pressure values were controlled. There was no overall significant difference in Kl, K4, and-K5 blood pressures among the three methods. These results suggest that when clinicians monitor variables such as the frequency response of arterial lines and peripheral vascular resistance, indirect blood pressure methods are reliable for use with stabilized trauma patients.",
author = "Norman, {Elizabeth M.} and Diane Cadaleta and {Clayton Griffin}, C.",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "86--89",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of three blood pressure methods in a stabilized acute trauma population

AU - Norman, Elizabeth M.

AU - Cadaleta, Diane

AU - Clayton Griffin, C.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Blood pressure values were evaluated in 30 acute adult trauma patients using two indirect methods, the bell and diaphragm components of the stethoscope, and one direct arterial mediod. Kl, K4, and K5 measurements were taken 4 to 72 hours (M = 30) after admission when vital signs had stabilized. Data were collected using a random-zero (KL) sphygmomanometer for indirect blood pressure and radial intraarterial cannula for direct blood pressure. The sequence of measurement was randomized and variables shown to alter blood pressure values were controlled. There was no overall significant difference in Kl, K4, and-K5 blood pressures among the three methods. These results suggest that when clinicians monitor variables such as the frequency response of arterial lines and peripheral vascular resistance, indirect blood pressure methods are reliable for use with stabilized trauma patients.

AB - Blood pressure values were evaluated in 30 acute adult trauma patients using two indirect methods, the bell and diaphragm components of the stethoscope, and one direct arterial mediod. Kl, K4, and K5 measurements were taken 4 to 72 hours (M = 30) after admission when vital signs had stabilized. Data were collected using a random-zero (KL) sphygmomanometer for indirect blood pressure and radial intraarterial cannula for direct blood pressure. The sequence of measurement was randomized and variables shown to alter blood pressure values were controlled. There was no overall significant difference in Kl, K4, and-K5 blood pressures among the three methods. These results suggest that when clinicians monitor variables such as the frequency response of arterial lines and peripheral vascular resistance, indirect blood pressure methods are reliable for use with stabilized trauma patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026127462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026127462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 86

EP - 89

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 2

ER -