An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry

A new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office

Elsbeth Kalenderian, Muhammad F. Walji, Anamaria Tavares, Rachel B. Ramoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There is a dearth of knowledge about the type and frequency of adverse events (AEs) in dentistry. Current approaches to obtaining information rely on reviews of randomly selected records, which may not be the most efficient or effective methodology. Methods: Inspired by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) global and outpatient trigger tools, which identifies records with characteristics ("triggers") that are associated with AEs, the authors created the dental clinic trigger tool. The triggers included procedures for incision and drainage, failed implants and selected treatment patterns. The authors ran the trigger tool against six months of electronic health records data and compared its performance with that of a review of 50 randomly selected patient records. Results: In total, 315 records were triggered, 158 (50 percent) of which were positive for one or more AEs; 17 (34 percent) of the 50 randomly selected records were positive for at least one AE. The authors assigned each AE an IHI severity ranking. Most AEs caused temporary harm, but nine were considered to have caused permanent harm according to a modified IHI severity ranking. Conclusions: The study results demonstrate the promise of a directed records review approach, as the dental clinic trigger tool was more effective in identifying AEs than was a review of randomly selected records. Practical Implications: All dental practices should proactively monitor the safety of the care they provide. Use of the trigger tool will help make this process more efficient and effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)808-814
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume144
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Dental Offices
Dentistry
Dental Clinics
Delivery of Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Drainage
Tooth
Outpatients
Safety
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Adverse event
  • Dentistry
  • Electronic health record
  • Patient safety
  • Trigger tool

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry : A new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office. / Kalenderian, Elsbeth; Walji, Muhammad F.; Tavares, Anamaria; Ramoni, Rachel B.

In: Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 144, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 808-814.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kalenderian, Elsbeth ; Walji, Muhammad F. ; Tavares, Anamaria ; Ramoni, Rachel B. / An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry : A new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office. In: Journal of the American Dental Association. 2013 ; Vol. 144, No. 7. pp. 808-814.
@article{4266a46ea7634a928c68f54ec45f6f66,
title = "An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry: A new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office",
abstract = "Background: There is a dearth of knowledge about the type and frequency of adverse events (AEs) in dentistry. Current approaches to obtaining information rely on reviews of randomly selected records, which may not be the most efficient or effective methodology. Methods: Inspired by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) global and outpatient trigger tools, which identifies records with characteristics ({"}triggers{"}) that are associated with AEs, the authors created the dental clinic trigger tool. The triggers included procedures for incision and drainage, failed implants and selected treatment patterns. The authors ran the trigger tool against six months of electronic health records data and compared its performance with that of a review of 50 randomly selected patient records. Results: In total, 315 records were triggered, 158 (50 percent) of which were positive for one or more AEs; 17 (34 percent) of the 50 randomly selected records were positive for at least one AE. The authors assigned each AE an IHI severity ranking. Most AEs caused temporary harm, but nine were considered to have caused permanent harm according to a modified IHI severity ranking. Conclusions: The study results demonstrate the promise of a directed records review approach, as the dental clinic trigger tool was more effective in identifying AEs than was a review of randomly selected records. Practical Implications: All dental practices should proactively monitor the safety of the care they provide. Use of the trigger tool will help make this process more efficient and effective.",
keywords = "Adverse event, Dentistry, Electronic health record, Patient safety, Trigger tool",
author = "Elsbeth Kalenderian and Walji, {Muhammad F.} and Anamaria Tavares and Ramoni, {Rachel B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "808--814",
journal = "Journal of the American Dental Association",
issn = "0002-8177",
publisher = "American Dental Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry

T2 - A new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office

AU - Kalenderian, Elsbeth

AU - Walji, Muhammad F.

AU - Tavares, Anamaria

AU - Ramoni, Rachel B.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Background: There is a dearth of knowledge about the type and frequency of adverse events (AEs) in dentistry. Current approaches to obtaining information rely on reviews of randomly selected records, which may not be the most efficient or effective methodology. Methods: Inspired by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) global and outpatient trigger tools, which identifies records with characteristics ("triggers") that are associated with AEs, the authors created the dental clinic trigger tool. The triggers included procedures for incision and drainage, failed implants and selected treatment patterns. The authors ran the trigger tool against six months of electronic health records data and compared its performance with that of a review of 50 randomly selected patient records. Results: In total, 315 records were triggered, 158 (50 percent) of which were positive for one or more AEs; 17 (34 percent) of the 50 randomly selected records were positive for at least one AE. The authors assigned each AE an IHI severity ranking. Most AEs caused temporary harm, but nine were considered to have caused permanent harm according to a modified IHI severity ranking. Conclusions: The study results demonstrate the promise of a directed records review approach, as the dental clinic trigger tool was more effective in identifying AEs than was a review of randomly selected records. Practical Implications: All dental practices should proactively monitor the safety of the care they provide. Use of the trigger tool will help make this process more efficient and effective.

AB - Background: There is a dearth of knowledge about the type and frequency of adverse events (AEs) in dentistry. Current approaches to obtaining information rely on reviews of randomly selected records, which may not be the most efficient or effective methodology. Methods: Inspired by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) global and outpatient trigger tools, which identifies records with characteristics ("triggers") that are associated with AEs, the authors created the dental clinic trigger tool. The triggers included procedures for incision and drainage, failed implants and selected treatment patterns. The authors ran the trigger tool against six months of electronic health records data and compared its performance with that of a review of 50 randomly selected patient records. Results: In total, 315 records were triggered, 158 (50 percent) of which were positive for one or more AEs; 17 (34 percent) of the 50 randomly selected records were positive for at least one AE. The authors assigned each AE an IHI severity ranking. Most AEs caused temporary harm, but nine were considered to have caused permanent harm according to a modified IHI severity ranking. Conclusions: The study results demonstrate the promise of a directed records review approach, as the dental clinic trigger tool was more effective in identifying AEs than was a review of randomly selected records. Practical Implications: All dental practices should proactively monitor the safety of the care they provide. Use of the trigger tool will help make this process more efficient and effective.

KW - Adverse event

KW - Dentistry

KW - Electronic health record

KW - Patient safety

KW - Trigger tool

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881114538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881114538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 144

SP - 808

EP - 814

JO - Journal of the American Dental Association

JF - Journal of the American Dental Association

SN - 0002-8177

IS - 7

ER -