Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable

H. Hannah Nam, John Jost, Lisa Kaggen, Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn, Jay Van Bavel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Individual variation in preferences to maintain versus change the societal status quo can manifest in the political realm by choosing leaders and policies that reinforce or undermine existing inequalities 1. We sought to understand which individuals are likely to defend or challenge inequality in society by exploring the neuroanatomical substrates of system justification tendencies. In two independent neuroimaging studies, we observed that larger bilateral amygdala volume was positively correlated with the tendency to believe that the existing social order was legitimate and desirable. These results held for members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups (men and women, respectively). Furthermore, individuals with larger amygdala volume were less likely to participate in subsequent protest movements. We ruled out alternative explanations in terms of attitudinal extremity and political orientation per se. Exploratory whole-brain analyses suggested that system justification effects may extend to structures that are adjacent to the amygdala, including parts of the insula and the orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggest that the amygdala may provide a neural substrate for maintaining the societal status quo, and opens avenues for further investigation into the association between system justification and other neuroanatomical regions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-138
Number of pages6
JournalNature Human Behaviour
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Amygdala
Vulnerable Populations
Prefrontal Cortex
Neuroimaging
Extremities
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable. / Hannah Nam, H.; Jost, John; Kaggen, Lisa; Campbell-Meiklejohn, Daniel; Van Bavel, Jay.

In: Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 133-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hannah Nam, H. ; Jost, John ; Kaggen, Lisa ; Campbell-Meiklejohn, Daniel ; Van Bavel, Jay. / Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable. In: Nature Human Behaviour. 2018 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 133-138.
@article{fb1cc89b3d3d4c9da722282298e21feb,
title = "Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable",
abstract = "Individual variation in preferences to maintain versus change the societal status quo can manifest in the political realm by choosing leaders and policies that reinforce or undermine existing inequalities 1. We sought to understand which individuals are likely to defend or challenge inequality in society by exploring the neuroanatomical substrates of system justification tendencies. In two independent neuroimaging studies, we observed that larger bilateral amygdala volume was positively correlated with the tendency to believe that the existing social order was legitimate and desirable. These results held for members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups (men and women, respectively). Furthermore, individuals with larger amygdala volume were less likely to participate in subsequent protest movements. We ruled out alternative explanations in terms of attitudinal extremity and political orientation per se. Exploratory whole-brain analyses suggested that system justification effects may extend to structures that are adjacent to the amygdala, including parts of the insula and the orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggest that the amygdala may provide a neural substrate for maintaining the societal status quo, and opens avenues for further investigation into the association between system justification and other neuroanatomical regions.",
author = "{Hannah Nam}, H. and John Jost and Lisa Kaggen and Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn and {Van Bavel}, Jay",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41562-017-0248-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "133--138",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
issn = "2397-3374",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Amygdala structure and the tendency to regard the social system as legitimate and desirable

AU - Hannah Nam, H.

AU - Jost, John

AU - Kaggen, Lisa

AU - Campbell-Meiklejohn, Daniel

AU - Van Bavel, Jay

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Individual variation in preferences to maintain versus change the societal status quo can manifest in the political realm by choosing leaders and policies that reinforce or undermine existing inequalities 1. We sought to understand which individuals are likely to defend or challenge inequality in society by exploring the neuroanatomical substrates of system justification tendencies. In two independent neuroimaging studies, we observed that larger bilateral amygdala volume was positively correlated with the tendency to believe that the existing social order was legitimate and desirable. These results held for members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups (men and women, respectively). Furthermore, individuals with larger amygdala volume were less likely to participate in subsequent protest movements. We ruled out alternative explanations in terms of attitudinal extremity and political orientation per se. Exploratory whole-brain analyses suggested that system justification effects may extend to structures that are adjacent to the amygdala, including parts of the insula and the orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggest that the amygdala may provide a neural substrate for maintaining the societal status quo, and opens avenues for further investigation into the association between system justification and other neuroanatomical regions.

AB - Individual variation in preferences to maintain versus change the societal status quo can manifest in the political realm by choosing leaders and policies that reinforce or undermine existing inequalities 1. We sought to understand which individuals are likely to defend or challenge inequality in society by exploring the neuroanatomical substrates of system justification tendencies. In two independent neuroimaging studies, we observed that larger bilateral amygdala volume was positively correlated with the tendency to believe that the existing social order was legitimate and desirable. These results held for members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups (men and women, respectively). Furthermore, individuals with larger amygdala volume were less likely to participate in subsequent protest movements. We ruled out alternative explanations in terms of attitudinal extremity and political orientation per se. Exploratory whole-brain analyses suggested that system justification effects may extend to structures that are adjacent to the amygdala, including parts of the insula and the orbitofrontal cortex. These findings suggest that the amygdala may provide a neural substrate for maintaining the societal status quo, and opens avenues for further investigation into the association between system justification and other neuroanatomical regions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042342730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042342730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-017-0248-5

DO - 10.1038/s41562-017-0248-5

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 133

EP - 138

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

SN - 2397-3374

IS - 2

ER -