America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends

Debra Laefer, S. Akter, C. McHale

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This paper is an investigation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) funding trends within America's research-active tenured and tenure-track, civil engineering community from 50 major, doctoral-granting institutions, with 5 schools examined in detail. Important questions are raised as to how funding patterns relate to rank and sub-discipline within Civil Engineering, and whether there is a causal link with publication rates. The paper presents key parameters with respect to issues that may be critical for tenure decisions at some institutions. They include total average number of awards per individual, the size of those awards normalized by named participant, and how these values have changed over the past nearly 40 years. These issues are considered for Geotechnical Engineering in comparison to other sub-disciplines within Civil Engineering. Funding breakdowns shows a higher reliance of Geotechnical engineers on traditional funding programs within NSF with a profoundly greater capacity to raise money at more senior levels, although these additional resources do not necessarily translate into increased journal publication rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeo-Frontiers 2011
Subtitle of host publicationAdvances in Geotechnical Engineering - Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 Conference
Pages2887-2896
Number of pages10
Edition211 GSP
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
EventGeo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Dallas, TX, United States
Duration: Mar 13 2011Mar 16 2011

Other

OtherGeo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering
CountryUnited States
CityDallas, TX
Period3/13/113/16/11

Fingerprint

civil engineering
Civil engineering
Geotechnical engineering
geotechnical engineering
Engineers
resource
trend
science
rate

Keywords

  • Engineering education
  • Faculty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Laefer, D., Akter, S., & McHale, C. (2011). America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends. In Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 Conference (211 GSP ed., pp. 2887-2896) https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)296

America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends. / Laefer, Debra; Akter, S.; McHale, C.

Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 Conference. 211 GSP. ed. 2011. p. 2887-2896.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Laefer, D, Akter, S & McHale, C 2011, America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends. in Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 Conference. 211 GSP edn, pp. 2887-2896, Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, Dallas, TX, United States, 3/13/11. https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)296
Laefer D, Akter S, McHale C. America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends. In Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 Conference. 211 GSP ed. 2011. p. 2887-2896 https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)296
Laefer, Debra ; Akter, S. ; McHale, C. / America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends. Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers 2011 Conference. 211 GSP. ed. 2011. pp. 2887-2896
@inproceedings{aa6593869e4f4238a0d842d32817c8dd,
title = "America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends",
abstract = "This paper is an investigation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) funding trends within America's research-active tenured and tenure-track, civil engineering community from 50 major, doctoral-granting institutions, with 5 schools examined in detail. Important questions are raised as to how funding patterns relate to rank and sub-discipline within Civil Engineering, and whether there is a causal link with publication rates. The paper presents key parameters with respect to issues that may be critical for tenure decisions at some institutions. They include total average number of awards per individual, the size of those awards normalized by named participant, and how these values have changed over the past nearly 40 years. These issues are considered for Geotechnical Engineering in comparison to other sub-disciplines within Civil Engineering. Funding breakdowns shows a higher reliance of Geotechnical engineers on traditional funding programs within NSF with a profoundly greater capacity to raise money at more senior levels, although these additional resources do not necessarily translate into increased journal publication rates.",
keywords = "Engineering education, Faculty",
author = "Debra Laefer and S. Akter and C. McHale",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1061/41165(397)296",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784411650",
pages = "2887--2896",
booktitle = "Geo-Frontiers 2011",
edition = "211 GSP",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - An investigation of national science foundation funding trends

AU - Laefer, Debra

AU - Akter, S.

AU - McHale, C.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This paper is an investigation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) funding trends within America's research-active tenured and tenure-track, civil engineering community from 50 major, doctoral-granting institutions, with 5 schools examined in detail. Important questions are raised as to how funding patterns relate to rank and sub-discipline within Civil Engineering, and whether there is a causal link with publication rates. The paper presents key parameters with respect to issues that may be critical for tenure decisions at some institutions. They include total average number of awards per individual, the size of those awards normalized by named participant, and how these values have changed over the past nearly 40 years. These issues are considered for Geotechnical Engineering in comparison to other sub-disciplines within Civil Engineering. Funding breakdowns shows a higher reliance of Geotechnical engineers on traditional funding programs within NSF with a profoundly greater capacity to raise money at more senior levels, although these additional resources do not necessarily translate into increased journal publication rates.

AB - This paper is an investigation of the National Science Foundation (NSF) funding trends within America's research-active tenured and tenure-track, civil engineering community from 50 major, doctoral-granting institutions, with 5 schools examined in detail. Important questions are raised as to how funding patterns relate to rank and sub-discipline within Civil Engineering, and whether there is a causal link with publication rates. The paper presents key parameters with respect to issues that may be critical for tenure decisions at some institutions. They include total average number of awards per individual, the size of those awards normalized by named participant, and how these values have changed over the past nearly 40 years. These issues are considered for Geotechnical Engineering in comparison to other sub-disciplines within Civil Engineering. Funding breakdowns shows a higher reliance of Geotechnical engineers on traditional funding programs within NSF with a profoundly greater capacity to raise money at more senior levels, although these additional resources do not necessarily translate into increased journal publication rates.

KW - Engineering education

KW - Faculty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956347558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956347558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41165(397)296

DO - 10.1061/41165(397)296

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79956347558

SN - 9780784411650

SP - 2887

EP - 2896

BT - Geo-Frontiers 2011

ER -