America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community

Debra Laefer, C. McHale

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This paper is a snapshot in time of the personal backgrounds, educational training, professional ranking, and productivity levels of those individuals with respect to Compendex-listed journal paper. Important questions are raised not only as to issues of age, gender, and nationality, but as to where the professoriate in geotechnical engineering is coming from, what level of experience they are bringing to their positions, and their professional standing. The results of this paper raise several, possibly unexpected observations including the apparent role that small, private, undergraduate programs have in grooming future faculty members; the fact that most female faculty members come from only a handful of doctoral programs; the increasing productivity of junior faculty members; and the aging of the community with respect to succession planning. This document is intended to be a discussion document for succession planning for the wider community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeoFlorida 2010
Subtitle of host publicationAdvances in Analysis, Modeling and Design - Proceedings of the GeoFlorida 2010 Conference
Pages3237-3246
Number of pages10
Edition199
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
EventGeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design Conference - West Palm Beach, FL, United States
Duration: Feb 20 2010Feb 24 2010

Other

OtherGeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design Conference
CountryUnited States
CityWest Palm Beach, FL
Period2/20/102/24/10

Fingerprint

Productivity
Planning
grooming
productivity
Geotechnical engineering
geotechnical engineering
ranking
gender
Aging of materials
document
programme
planning

Keywords

  • Engineering education
  • Faculty
  • Geotechnical engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Laefer, D., & McHale, C. (2010). America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community. In GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design - Proceedings of the GeoFlorida 2010 Conference (199 ed., pp. 3237-3246) https://doi.org/10.1061/41095(365)330

America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community. / Laefer, Debra; McHale, C.

GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design - Proceedings of the GeoFlorida 2010 Conference. 199. ed. 2010. p. 3237-3246.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Laefer, D & McHale, C 2010, America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community. in GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design - Proceedings of the GeoFlorida 2010 Conference. 199 edn, pp. 3237-3246, GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design Conference, West Palm Beach, FL, United States, 2/20/10. https://doi.org/10.1061/41095(365)330
Laefer D, McHale C. America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community. In GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design - Proceedings of the GeoFlorida 2010 Conference. 199 ed. 2010. p. 3237-3246 https://doi.org/10.1061/41095(365)330
Laefer, Debra ; McHale, C. / America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community. GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling and Design - Proceedings of the GeoFlorida 2010 Conference. 199. ed. 2010. pp. 3237-3246
@inproceedings{ed168a6a47284c768fadf5eb299d6933,
title = "America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community",
abstract = "This paper is a snapshot in time of the personal backgrounds, educational training, professional ranking, and productivity levels of those individuals with respect to Compendex-listed journal paper. Important questions are raised not only as to issues of age, gender, and nationality, but as to where the professoriate in geotechnical engineering is coming from, what level of experience they are bringing to their positions, and their professional standing. The results of this paper raise several, possibly unexpected observations including the apparent role that small, private, undergraduate programs have in grooming future faculty members; the fact that most female faculty members come from only a handful of doctoral programs; the increasing productivity of junior faculty members; and the aging of the community with respect to succession planning. This document is intended to be a discussion document for succession planning for the wider community.",
keywords = "Engineering education, Faculty, Geotechnical engineering",
author = "Debra Laefer and C. McHale",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1061/41095(365)330",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784410950",
pages = "3237--3246",
booktitle = "GeoFlorida 2010",
edition = "199",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - America's research-active, geotechnical faculty members - A snapshot of the community

AU - Laefer, Debra

AU - McHale, C.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper is a snapshot in time of the personal backgrounds, educational training, professional ranking, and productivity levels of those individuals with respect to Compendex-listed journal paper. Important questions are raised not only as to issues of age, gender, and nationality, but as to where the professoriate in geotechnical engineering is coming from, what level of experience they are bringing to their positions, and their professional standing. The results of this paper raise several, possibly unexpected observations including the apparent role that small, private, undergraduate programs have in grooming future faculty members; the fact that most female faculty members come from only a handful of doctoral programs; the increasing productivity of junior faculty members; and the aging of the community with respect to succession planning. This document is intended to be a discussion document for succession planning for the wider community.

AB - This paper is a snapshot in time of the personal backgrounds, educational training, professional ranking, and productivity levels of those individuals with respect to Compendex-listed journal paper. Important questions are raised not only as to issues of age, gender, and nationality, but as to where the professoriate in geotechnical engineering is coming from, what level of experience they are bringing to their positions, and their professional standing. The results of this paper raise several, possibly unexpected observations including the apparent role that small, private, undergraduate programs have in grooming future faculty members; the fact that most female faculty members come from only a handful of doctoral programs; the increasing productivity of junior faculty members; and the aging of the community with respect to succession planning. This document is intended to be a discussion document for succession planning for the wider community.

KW - Engineering education

KW - Faculty

KW - Geotechnical engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959613812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959613812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41095(365)330

DO - 10.1061/41095(365)330

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780784410950

SP - 3237

EP - 3246

BT - GeoFlorida 2010

ER -