Allometry, merism, and tooth shape of the upper deciduous M2 and permanent M1

Shara Bailey, Stefano Benazzi, Jean Jacques Hublin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of allometry on the shape of dm2 and M1 crown outlines and to examine whether the trajectory and magnitude of scaling are shared between species. The sample included 160 recent Homo sapiens, 28 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens, 10 early H. sapiens, and 33 H. neanderthalensis (Neandertal) individuals. Of these, 97 were dm2/M1 pairs from the same individuals. A two-block partial least squares analysis of paired individuals revealed a significant correlation in crown shape between dm2 and M1. A principal component analysis confirmed that Neandertal and H. sapiens dm2 and M1 shapes differ significantly and that this difference is primarily related to hypocone size and projection. Allometry accounted for a small but significant proportion of the total morphological variance. We found the magnitude of the allometric effect to be significantly stronger in Neandertals than in H. sapiens. Procrustes distances were significantly different between the two tooth classes in Neandertals, but not among H. sapiens groups. Nevertheless, we could not reject the null hypothesis that the two species share the same allometric trajectory. Although size clearly contributes to the unique shape of the Neandertal dm2 and M1, the largest H. sapiens teeth do not exhibit the most Neandertal-like morphology. Hence, additional factors must contribute to the differences in dm2 and M1 crown shape between these two species. We suggest an investigation of the role of timing and rate of development on the shapes of the dm 2 and M1 may provide further answers. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)104-114
    Number of pages11
    JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
    Volume154
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Tooth
    Neanderthals
    Crowns
    scaling
    projection
    Principal Component Analysis
    Least-Squares Analysis
    Group

    Keywords

    • allometry
    • deciduous molar
    • geometric morphometrics
    • H. neanderthalensis
    • Homo sapiens
    • metameric variation
    • outline shape

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anthropology
    • Anatomy

    Cite this

    Allometry, merism, and tooth shape of the upper deciduous M2 and permanent M1. / Bailey, Shara; Benazzi, Stefano; Hublin, Jean Jacques.

    In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 154, No. 1, 2014, p. 104-114.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bailey, Shara ; Benazzi, Stefano ; Hublin, Jean Jacques. / Allometry, merism, and tooth shape of the upper deciduous M2 and permanent M1. In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2014 ; Vol. 154, No. 1. pp. 104-114.
    @article{9d1fba09689c4a59920a2fcb762371a8,
    title = "Allometry, merism, and tooth shape of the upper deciduous M2 and permanent M1",
    abstract = "The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of allometry on the shape of dm2 and M1 crown outlines and to examine whether the trajectory and magnitude of scaling are shared between species. The sample included 160 recent Homo sapiens, 28 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens, 10 early H. sapiens, and 33 H. neanderthalensis (Neandertal) individuals. Of these, 97 were dm2/M1 pairs from the same individuals. A two-block partial least squares analysis of paired individuals revealed a significant correlation in crown shape between dm2 and M1. A principal component analysis confirmed that Neandertal and H. sapiens dm2 and M1 shapes differ significantly and that this difference is primarily related to hypocone size and projection. Allometry accounted for a small but significant proportion of the total morphological variance. We found the magnitude of the allometric effect to be significantly stronger in Neandertals than in H. sapiens. Procrustes distances were significantly different between the two tooth classes in Neandertals, but not among H. sapiens groups. Nevertheless, we could not reject the null hypothesis that the two species share the same allometric trajectory. Although size clearly contributes to the unique shape of the Neandertal dm2 and M1, the largest H. sapiens teeth do not exhibit the most Neandertal-like morphology. Hence, additional factors must contribute to the differences in dm2 and M1 crown shape between these two species. We suggest an investigation of the role of timing and rate of development on the shapes of the dm 2 and M1 may provide further answers. {\circledC} 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
    keywords = "allometry, deciduous molar, geometric morphometrics, H. neanderthalensis, Homo sapiens, metameric variation, outline shape",
    author = "Shara Bailey and Stefano Benazzi and Hublin, {Jean Jacques}",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1002/ajpa.22477",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "154",
    pages = "104--114",
    journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
    issn = "0002-9483",
    publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Allometry, merism, and tooth shape of the upper deciduous M2 and permanent M1

    AU - Bailey, Shara

    AU - Benazzi, Stefano

    AU - Hublin, Jean Jacques

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of allometry on the shape of dm2 and M1 crown outlines and to examine whether the trajectory and magnitude of scaling are shared between species. The sample included 160 recent Homo sapiens, 28 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens, 10 early H. sapiens, and 33 H. neanderthalensis (Neandertal) individuals. Of these, 97 were dm2/M1 pairs from the same individuals. A two-block partial least squares analysis of paired individuals revealed a significant correlation in crown shape between dm2 and M1. A principal component analysis confirmed that Neandertal and H. sapiens dm2 and M1 shapes differ significantly and that this difference is primarily related to hypocone size and projection. Allometry accounted for a small but significant proportion of the total morphological variance. We found the magnitude of the allometric effect to be significantly stronger in Neandertals than in H. sapiens. Procrustes distances were significantly different between the two tooth classes in Neandertals, but not among H. sapiens groups. Nevertheless, we could not reject the null hypothesis that the two species share the same allometric trajectory. Although size clearly contributes to the unique shape of the Neandertal dm2 and M1, the largest H. sapiens teeth do not exhibit the most Neandertal-like morphology. Hence, additional factors must contribute to the differences in dm2 and M1 crown shape between these two species. We suggest an investigation of the role of timing and rate of development on the shapes of the dm 2 and M1 may provide further answers. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    AB - The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of allometry on the shape of dm2 and M1 crown outlines and to examine whether the trajectory and magnitude of scaling are shared between species. The sample included 160 recent Homo sapiens, 28 Upper Paleolithic H. sapiens, 10 early H. sapiens, and 33 H. neanderthalensis (Neandertal) individuals. Of these, 97 were dm2/M1 pairs from the same individuals. A two-block partial least squares analysis of paired individuals revealed a significant correlation in crown shape between dm2 and M1. A principal component analysis confirmed that Neandertal and H. sapiens dm2 and M1 shapes differ significantly and that this difference is primarily related to hypocone size and projection. Allometry accounted for a small but significant proportion of the total morphological variance. We found the magnitude of the allometric effect to be significantly stronger in Neandertals than in H. sapiens. Procrustes distances were significantly different between the two tooth classes in Neandertals, but not among H. sapiens groups. Nevertheless, we could not reject the null hypothesis that the two species share the same allometric trajectory. Although size clearly contributes to the unique shape of the Neandertal dm2 and M1, the largest H. sapiens teeth do not exhibit the most Neandertal-like morphology. Hence, additional factors must contribute to the differences in dm2 and M1 crown shape between these two species. We suggest an investigation of the role of timing and rate of development on the shapes of the dm 2 and M1 may provide further answers. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    KW - allometry

    KW - deciduous molar

    KW - geometric morphometrics

    KW - H. neanderthalensis

    KW - Homo sapiens

    KW - metameric variation

    KW - outline shape

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898043957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898043957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.22477

    DO - 10.1002/ajpa.22477

    M3 - Article

    VL - 154

    SP - 104

    EP - 114

    JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

    JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

    SN - 0002-9483

    IS - 1

    ER -