Aid, exclusion, and the local dynamics of insurgency in Afghanistan

Daniel Karell, Sebastian Schutte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Can developmental aid bring peace to war-torn communities? The current literature is divided on this issue. One line of reasoning suggests that aid is likely to decrease violence by improving employment and prosperity, thereby making participation in conflict more costly. Another view cites evidence showing an association between aid projects and increased insurgent activity. Addressing this contradiction, we argue that different types of aid projects lead to different outcomes, as some projects foster an unequal distribution of benefits within communities. Our reasoning draws on qualitative accounts from conflict zones, recent research on how grievances associated with exclusion can foster civil war onset, and experimental findings regarding perceived inequity and punishment. Building on this scholarship, we use a recently developed event-matching methodology to offer insight from contemporary Afghanistan. Aid projects that tend to exclude portions of the community yield more insurgent activity in their wake than more inclusive projects. These results shed light on why some aid projects reduce violence while others do not, emphasizing that efforts to ‘win hearts and minds’ can be a source of both contentment and contestation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Peace Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Afghanistan
exclusion
violence
community
prosperity
civil war
Violence
penalty
peace
participation
event
methodology
evidence

Keywords

  • Afghanistan
  • development aid
  • event analysis
  • grievances
  • insurgency
  • matching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Aid, exclusion, and the local dynamics of insurgency in Afghanistan. / Karell, Daniel; Schutte, Sebastian.

In: Journal of Peace Research, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e245336c964f4fd19f98a038ae935b6d,
title = "Aid, exclusion, and the local dynamics of insurgency in Afghanistan",
abstract = "Can developmental aid bring peace to war-torn communities? The current literature is divided on this issue. One line of reasoning suggests that aid is likely to decrease violence by improving employment and prosperity, thereby making participation in conflict more costly. Another view cites evidence showing an association between aid projects and increased insurgent activity. Addressing this contradiction, we argue that different types of aid projects lead to different outcomes, as some projects foster an unequal distribution of benefits within communities. Our reasoning draws on qualitative accounts from conflict zones, recent research on how grievances associated with exclusion can foster civil war onset, and experimental findings regarding perceived inequity and punishment. Building on this scholarship, we use a recently developed event-matching methodology to offer insight from contemporary Afghanistan. Aid projects that tend to exclude portions of the community yield more insurgent activity in their wake than more inclusive projects. These results shed light on why some aid projects reduce violence while others do not, emphasizing that efforts to ‘win hearts and minds’ can be a source of both contentment and contestation.",
keywords = "Afghanistan, development aid, event analysis, grievances, insurgency, matching",
author = "Daniel Karell and Sebastian Schutte",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022343318777566",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aid, exclusion, and the local dynamics of insurgency in Afghanistan

AU - Karell, Daniel

AU - Schutte, Sebastian

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Can developmental aid bring peace to war-torn communities? The current literature is divided on this issue. One line of reasoning suggests that aid is likely to decrease violence by improving employment and prosperity, thereby making participation in conflict more costly. Another view cites evidence showing an association between aid projects and increased insurgent activity. Addressing this contradiction, we argue that different types of aid projects lead to different outcomes, as some projects foster an unequal distribution of benefits within communities. Our reasoning draws on qualitative accounts from conflict zones, recent research on how grievances associated with exclusion can foster civil war onset, and experimental findings regarding perceived inequity and punishment. Building on this scholarship, we use a recently developed event-matching methodology to offer insight from contemporary Afghanistan. Aid projects that tend to exclude portions of the community yield more insurgent activity in their wake than more inclusive projects. These results shed light on why some aid projects reduce violence while others do not, emphasizing that efforts to ‘win hearts and minds’ can be a source of both contentment and contestation.

AB - Can developmental aid bring peace to war-torn communities? The current literature is divided on this issue. One line of reasoning suggests that aid is likely to decrease violence by improving employment and prosperity, thereby making participation in conflict more costly. Another view cites evidence showing an association between aid projects and increased insurgent activity. Addressing this contradiction, we argue that different types of aid projects lead to different outcomes, as some projects foster an unequal distribution of benefits within communities. Our reasoning draws on qualitative accounts from conflict zones, recent research on how grievances associated with exclusion can foster civil war onset, and experimental findings regarding perceived inequity and punishment. Building on this scholarship, we use a recently developed event-matching methodology to offer insight from contemporary Afghanistan. Aid projects that tend to exclude portions of the community yield more insurgent activity in their wake than more inclusive projects. These results shed light on why some aid projects reduce violence while others do not, emphasizing that efforts to ‘win hearts and minds’ can be a source of both contentment and contestation.

KW - Afghanistan

KW - development aid

KW - event analysis

KW - grievances

KW - insurgency

KW - matching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053306066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053306066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022343318777566

DO - 10.1177/0022343318777566

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053306066

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

ER -