Agricultural productivity and rural incomes in England and the Yangtze Delta, c.1620-c.1820

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The productivity of agriculture in England and the Yangtze Delta are compared c .1620 and c .1820 in order to gauge the performance of the most advanced part of China vis-à-vis its counterpart in Europe. The value of real output is compared using purchasing power parity exchange rates. Output per hectare was nine times greater in the Yangtze Delta than in England. More surprisingly, output per day worked was about 90 per cent of the English performance. This put Yangtze farmers slightly behind English and Dutch farmers c .1820, but ahead of most other farmers in Europe - an impressive achievement. There was little change in Yangtze agricultural productivity between 1620 and 1820. In 1820, the real income of a Yangtze peasant family was also about the same as that of an English agricultural labourer. All was not rosy in the Yangtze, however, for incomes there were on a downward trajectory. Agriculture income per family declined between 1620 and 1820, even though income per day worked changed little since population growth led to smaller farms and fewer days worked per year. The real earnings of women in textile production also declined, since the relative price of cotton cloth dropped - possibly also because a larger population led to greater production. The implication is that the Yangtze family, unlike the English family, had a considerably higher real income c .1620, and that period was the Delta's golden age.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)525-550
Number of pages26
JournalEconomic History Review
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 28 2009

Fingerprint

Rural income
England
Agricultural productivity
Agricultural Productivity
Income
Farmers
Agriculture
Real income
China
Trajectory
Small farms
Purchasing power parity
Real output
Cloth
Productivity
Peasants
Population growth
Relative prices
Cotton
Exchange rates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Agricultural productivity and rural incomes in England and the Yangtze Delta, c.1620-c.1820. / Allen, Robert (Bob).

In: Economic History Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, 28.07.2009, p. 525-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ace7b837b634caa8136bd5488057eea,
title = "Agricultural productivity and rural incomes in England and the Yangtze Delta, c.1620-c.1820",
abstract = "The productivity of agriculture in England and the Yangtze Delta are compared c .1620 and c .1820 in order to gauge the performance of the most advanced part of China vis-{\`a}-vis its counterpart in Europe. The value of real output is compared using purchasing power parity exchange rates. Output per hectare was nine times greater in the Yangtze Delta than in England. More surprisingly, output per day worked was about 90 per cent of the English performance. This put Yangtze farmers slightly behind English and Dutch farmers c .1820, but ahead of most other farmers in Europe - an impressive achievement. There was little change in Yangtze agricultural productivity between 1620 and 1820. In 1820, the real income of a Yangtze peasant family was also about the same as that of an English agricultural labourer. All was not rosy in the Yangtze, however, for incomes there were on a downward trajectory. Agriculture income per family declined between 1620 and 1820, even though income per day worked changed little since population growth led to smaller farms and fewer days worked per year. The real earnings of women in textile production also declined, since the relative price of cotton cloth dropped - possibly also because a larger population led to greater production. The implication is that the Yangtze family, unlike the English family, had a considerably higher real income c .1620, and that period was the Delta's golden age.",
author = "Allen, {Robert (Bob)}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0289.2008.00443.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "525--550",
journal = "Economic History Review",
issn = "0013-0117",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agricultural productivity and rural incomes in England and the Yangtze Delta, c.1620-c.1820

AU - Allen, Robert (Bob)

PY - 2009/7/28

Y1 - 2009/7/28

N2 - The productivity of agriculture in England and the Yangtze Delta are compared c .1620 and c .1820 in order to gauge the performance of the most advanced part of China vis-à-vis its counterpart in Europe. The value of real output is compared using purchasing power parity exchange rates. Output per hectare was nine times greater in the Yangtze Delta than in England. More surprisingly, output per day worked was about 90 per cent of the English performance. This put Yangtze farmers slightly behind English and Dutch farmers c .1820, but ahead of most other farmers in Europe - an impressive achievement. There was little change in Yangtze agricultural productivity between 1620 and 1820. In 1820, the real income of a Yangtze peasant family was also about the same as that of an English agricultural labourer. All was not rosy in the Yangtze, however, for incomes there were on a downward trajectory. Agriculture income per family declined between 1620 and 1820, even though income per day worked changed little since population growth led to smaller farms and fewer days worked per year. The real earnings of women in textile production also declined, since the relative price of cotton cloth dropped - possibly also because a larger population led to greater production. The implication is that the Yangtze family, unlike the English family, had a considerably higher real income c .1620, and that period was the Delta's golden age.

AB - The productivity of agriculture in England and the Yangtze Delta are compared c .1620 and c .1820 in order to gauge the performance of the most advanced part of China vis-à-vis its counterpart in Europe. The value of real output is compared using purchasing power parity exchange rates. Output per hectare was nine times greater in the Yangtze Delta than in England. More surprisingly, output per day worked was about 90 per cent of the English performance. This put Yangtze farmers slightly behind English and Dutch farmers c .1820, but ahead of most other farmers in Europe - an impressive achievement. There was little change in Yangtze agricultural productivity between 1620 and 1820. In 1820, the real income of a Yangtze peasant family was also about the same as that of an English agricultural labourer. All was not rosy in the Yangtze, however, for incomes there were on a downward trajectory. Agriculture income per family declined between 1620 and 1820, even though income per day worked changed little since population growth led to smaller farms and fewer days worked per year. The real earnings of women in textile production also declined, since the relative price of cotton cloth dropped - possibly also because a larger population led to greater production. The implication is that the Yangtze family, unlike the English family, had a considerably higher real income c .1620, and that period was the Delta's golden age.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651021926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651021926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2008.00443.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2008.00443.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67651021926

VL - 62

SP - 525

EP - 550

JO - Economic History Review

JF - Economic History Review

SN - 0013-0117

IS - 3

ER -