Affective Architectures: Photographic Evidence and the Evolution of Courtroom Visuality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the courtroom situation, focusing on courtroom spectatorship, architecture, and visuality in US trials. Visual evidence is situated within the architectural apparatus of the courtroom to examine how affect unfolds between a testifying witness and courtroom audience members. The movement of photographic evidence during judicial proceedings is linked to the disruption of temporal and spatial equilibrium. The idea is introduced that a feeling of vertigo is produced in the testifying witness and audience participants. Following Sianne Ngai’s conception of the ‘minor affects’, it is proposed that disconcertion and confusion are characteristics of witness testimony and thus important political affects to note in analyses of the relationship between vision and the discovery of justice in legal spectatorship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-222
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Visual Culture
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

witness
evidence
testimony
justice
Courtroom
Affective
Visuality
Witness
Spectatorship

Keywords

  • chiasmus
  • domestic violence
  • legal spectatorship
  • minor affects
  • photographic evidence
  • proprioception
  • vertigo

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

Affective Architectures : Photographic Evidence and the Evolution of Courtroom Visuality. / Moore, Kelli.

In: Journal of Visual Culture, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.08.2018, p. 207-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a417ea01e6044fbaa1a881548cbbfc4,
title = "Affective Architectures: Photographic Evidence and the Evolution of Courtroom Visuality",
abstract = "This article examines the courtroom situation, focusing on courtroom spectatorship, architecture, and visuality in US trials. Visual evidence is situated within the architectural apparatus of the courtroom to examine how affect unfolds between a testifying witness and courtroom audience members. The movement of photographic evidence during judicial proceedings is linked to the disruption of temporal and spatial equilibrium. The idea is introduced that a feeling of vertigo is produced in the testifying witness and audience participants. Following Sianne Ngai’s conception of the ‘minor affects’, it is proposed that disconcertion and confusion are characteristics of witness testimony and thus important political affects to note in analyses of the relationship between vision and the discovery of justice in legal spectatorship.",
keywords = "chiasmus, domestic violence, legal spectatorship, minor affects, photographic evidence, proprioception, vertigo",
author = "Kelli Moore",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1470412918783841",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "207--222",
journal = "Journal of Visual Culture",
issn = "1470-4129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affective Architectures

T2 - Photographic Evidence and the Evolution of Courtroom Visuality

AU - Moore, Kelli

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - This article examines the courtroom situation, focusing on courtroom spectatorship, architecture, and visuality in US trials. Visual evidence is situated within the architectural apparatus of the courtroom to examine how affect unfolds between a testifying witness and courtroom audience members. The movement of photographic evidence during judicial proceedings is linked to the disruption of temporal and spatial equilibrium. The idea is introduced that a feeling of vertigo is produced in the testifying witness and audience participants. Following Sianne Ngai’s conception of the ‘minor affects’, it is proposed that disconcertion and confusion are characteristics of witness testimony and thus important political affects to note in analyses of the relationship between vision and the discovery of justice in legal spectatorship.

AB - This article examines the courtroom situation, focusing on courtroom spectatorship, architecture, and visuality in US trials. Visual evidence is situated within the architectural apparatus of the courtroom to examine how affect unfolds between a testifying witness and courtroom audience members. The movement of photographic evidence during judicial proceedings is linked to the disruption of temporal and spatial equilibrium. The idea is introduced that a feeling of vertigo is produced in the testifying witness and audience participants. Following Sianne Ngai’s conception of the ‘minor affects’, it is proposed that disconcertion and confusion are characteristics of witness testimony and thus important political affects to note in analyses of the relationship between vision and the discovery of justice in legal spectatorship.

KW - chiasmus

KW - domestic violence

KW - legal spectatorship

KW - minor affects

KW - photographic evidence

KW - proprioception

KW - vertigo

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051479904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051479904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1470412918783841

DO - 10.1177/1470412918783841

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051479904

VL - 17

SP - 207

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Visual Culture

JF - Journal of Visual Culture

SN - 1470-4129

IS - 2

ER -