ADR, TQM, partnering, and other management fantasies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper addresses the current management problems associated with the architect-engineering-construction industry. It makes the assertion that the current fads of total quality management (TQM), alternate dispute resolution (ADR), partnering, and some of the older concepts of management by objective, exception, etc., skirt the problems facing the industry. The concepts of TQM, ADR, and partnering all make oblique approaches to apply W. Edward Deming's management fundamentals and leadership to the construction team and provide the solution necessary for competitive productivity in the construction industry. They are a move toward Deming's management approach that provided the road map for Japan to win the battle of competitive productivity. His 14 points with strong leadership in modifying the way the construction industry does business in the United States are proposed as an approach for the right solution. Arguments are presented why direct adoption of Deming's approach cannot work in the present culture of the construction industry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-344
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume118
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Total quality management
Construction industry
Productivity
Industry
Partnering
Dispute resolution
Fantasy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial relations
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Engineering (miscellaneous)

Cite this

ADR, TQM, partnering, and other management fantasies. / Griffis, Fletcher.

In: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 118, No. 4, 1992, p. 331-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1bd88074b5f45ad9c85b60ddfd1dfc8,
title = "ADR, TQM, partnering, and other management fantasies",
abstract = "This paper addresses the current management problems associated with the architect-engineering-construction industry. It makes the assertion that the current fads of total quality management (TQM), alternate dispute resolution (ADR), partnering, and some of the older concepts of management by objective, exception, etc., skirt the problems facing the industry. The concepts of TQM, ADR, and partnering all make oblique approaches to apply W. Edward Deming's management fundamentals and leadership to the construction team and provide the solution necessary for competitive productivity in the construction industry. They are a move toward Deming's management approach that provided the road map for Japan to win the battle of competitive productivity. His 14 points with strong leadership in modifying the way the construction industry does business in the United States are proposed as an approach for the right solution. Arguments are presented why direct adoption of Deming's approach cannot work in the present culture of the construction industry.",
author = "Fletcher Griffis",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(331)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "331--344",
journal = "Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice",
issn = "1052-3928",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ADR, TQM, partnering, and other management fantasies

AU - Griffis, Fletcher

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - This paper addresses the current management problems associated with the architect-engineering-construction industry. It makes the assertion that the current fads of total quality management (TQM), alternate dispute resolution (ADR), partnering, and some of the older concepts of management by objective, exception, etc., skirt the problems facing the industry. The concepts of TQM, ADR, and partnering all make oblique approaches to apply W. Edward Deming's management fundamentals and leadership to the construction team and provide the solution necessary for competitive productivity in the construction industry. They are a move toward Deming's management approach that provided the road map for Japan to win the battle of competitive productivity. His 14 points with strong leadership in modifying the way the construction industry does business in the United States are proposed as an approach for the right solution. Arguments are presented why direct adoption of Deming's approach cannot work in the present culture of the construction industry.

AB - This paper addresses the current management problems associated with the architect-engineering-construction industry. It makes the assertion that the current fads of total quality management (TQM), alternate dispute resolution (ADR), partnering, and some of the older concepts of management by objective, exception, etc., skirt the problems facing the industry. The concepts of TQM, ADR, and partnering all make oblique approaches to apply W. Edward Deming's management fundamentals and leadership to the construction team and provide the solution necessary for competitive productivity in the construction industry. They are a move toward Deming's management approach that provided the road map for Japan to win the battle of competitive productivity. His 14 points with strong leadership in modifying the way the construction industry does business in the United States are proposed as an approach for the right solution. Arguments are presented why direct adoption of Deming's approach cannot work in the present culture of the construction industry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026933050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026933050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(331)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1992)118:4(331)

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 331

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

JF - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

SN - 1052-3928

IS - 4

ER -