Addressing pricing: Value bidding for engineers and consultants

Carrie S. Sturts, Fletcher Griffis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper presents a unique treatment of competitive bidding theory as applied to pricing engineering services. Unlike low-bid procurement, the selection of engineers and design consultants is often based on several factors such as quality, availability, reputation, resume, and references, and these criteria may or may not include price. From preliminary interviews, the authors conclude that there is a need for a systematic method of evaluating potential job opportunities and determining fair market prices. This hybrid model, Value-Bidding, refocuses the competitive bidding model from a fee-based selection criteria to a value-based selection criteria. Value-Bidding utilizes an established marketing research methodology, conjoint analysis, to establish the probability of winning based on multiple factors. The resulting analytical model enables engineers to analyze market conditions, evaluate client priorities, systematically track competitors, and optimize proposals, while maximizing the probability of winning, maximizing profit, and optimizing price.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-630
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume131
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Engineers
Marketing
Costs
Analytical models
Profitability
Availability
Consultants
Pricing
Bidding
Competitive bidding
Factors
Selection criteria
Procurement
Service engineering
Bidding theory
Market conditions
Analytical model
Profit
Bid
Fees

Keywords

  • Bids
  • Business administration
  • Construction industry
  • Consulting services
  • Engineering services
  • Market research
  • Pricing
  • Professional role

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Addressing pricing : Value bidding for engineers and consultants. / Sturts, Carrie S.; Griffis, Fletcher.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 6, 06.2005, p. 621-630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08b40ce0d5d64224ab045c25310b0158,
title = "Addressing pricing: Value bidding for engineers and consultants",
abstract = "This paper presents a unique treatment of competitive bidding theory as applied to pricing engineering services. Unlike low-bid procurement, the selection of engineers and design consultants is often based on several factors such as quality, availability, reputation, resume, and references, and these criteria may or may not include price. From preliminary interviews, the authors conclude that there is a need for a systematic method of evaluating potential job opportunities and determining fair market prices. This hybrid model, Value-Bidding, refocuses the competitive bidding model from a fee-based selection criteria to a value-based selection criteria. Value-Bidding utilizes an established marketing research methodology, conjoint analysis, to establish the probability of winning based on multiple factors. The resulting analytical model enables engineers to analyze market conditions, evaluate client priorities, systematically track competitors, and optimize proposals, while maximizing the probability of winning, maximizing profit, and optimizing price.",
keywords = "Bids, Business administration, Construction industry, Consulting services, Engineering services, Market research, Pricing, Professional role",
author = "Sturts, {Carrie S.} and Fletcher Griffis",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(621)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "621--630",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing pricing

T2 - Value bidding for engineers and consultants

AU - Sturts, Carrie S.

AU - Griffis, Fletcher

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - This paper presents a unique treatment of competitive bidding theory as applied to pricing engineering services. Unlike low-bid procurement, the selection of engineers and design consultants is often based on several factors such as quality, availability, reputation, resume, and references, and these criteria may or may not include price. From preliminary interviews, the authors conclude that there is a need for a systematic method of evaluating potential job opportunities and determining fair market prices. This hybrid model, Value-Bidding, refocuses the competitive bidding model from a fee-based selection criteria to a value-based selection criteria. Value-Bidding utilizes an established marketing research methodology, conjoint analysis, to establish the probability of winning based on multiple factors. The resulting analytical model enables engineers to analyze market conditions, evaluate client priorities, systematically track competitors, and optimize proposals, while maximizing the probability of winning, maximizing profit, and optimizing price.

AB - This paper presents a unique treatment of competitive bidding theory as applied to pricing engineering services. Unlike low-bid procurement, the selection of engineers and design consultants is often based on several factors such as quality, availability, reputation, resume, and references, and these criteria may or may not include price. From preliminary interviews, the authors conclude that there is a need for a systematic method of evaluating potential job opportunities and determining fair market prices. This hybrid model, Value-Bidding, refocuses the competitive bidding model from a fee-based selection criteria to a value-based selection criteria. Value-Bidding utilizes an established marketing research methodology, conjoint analysis, to establish the probability of winning based on multiple factors. The resulting analytical model enables engineers to analyze market conditions, evaluate client priorities, systematically track competitors, and optimize proposals, while maximizing the probability of winning, maximizing profit, and optimizing price.

KW - Bids

KW - Business administration

KW - Construction industry

KW - Consulting services

KW - Engineering services

KW - Market research

KW - Pricing

KW - Professional role

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444505119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444505119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(621)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(621)

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 621

EP - 630

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 6

ER -