Adding unregulated nursing support workers to ward staffing: Exploration of a natural experiment

Christine Duffield, Michael Roche, Di Twigg, Anne Williams, Samantha Rowbotham, Sean Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To explore the impact of an initiative to add unregulated nursing support workers to wards in acute care hospitals. Background: Adding nursing support workers to existing nurse staffing may be one solution to reduce nursing workloads and improve outcomes. However, the effects of this addition on nurse, patient and system outcomes are not well documented. In one state of Australia, a trial deployment of nursing support workers to wards across the public health system provided opportunity for the exploration of their impact in a natural, real-world, environment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A sample of five wards where nursing support workers had been added matched to a group of five wards where there were no nursing support workers. Data were collected via patient survey (n = 141) and nurse survey (n = 154). Analysis was comparative with regression models constructed for the different ward types. Results: Nursing leadership, staffing and resources, and nurse experience were linked to outcomes on both ward types. Instability was a significant predictor of reduced quality of care and increased turnover intention on wards where support workers were added. Conclusion: Adding nursing support workers to ward staffing did not lead to improvements in patient care. Findings suggest that staffing a nursing ward is a complex activity and that a simple approach to staffing is unlikely to be successful. Future research should explore the process of implementation and the conditions under which this strategy is likely to be successful. Relevance to clinical practice: Ward-level factors are key in making appropriate staffing and skill mix choices to limit instability and to consequently avoid negative patient, staff and system outcomes. Consideration of the ward context, alongside effective delegation processes and integration into the care team are imperative when adding nursing support workers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3768-3779
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume27
Issue number19-20
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Nursing
Nurses
Quality of Health Care
Workload
Patient Care
Public Health
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • model of care
  • nurse outcomes
  • patient outcomes
  • system outcomes
  • unregulated nursing support workers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Adding unregulated nursing support workers to ward staffing : Exploration of a natural experiment. / Duffield, Christine; Roche, Michael; Twigg, Di; Williams, Anne; Rowbotham, Samantha; Clarke, Sean.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 27, No. 19-20, 01.10.2018, p. 3768-3779.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duffield, Christine ; Roche, Michael ; Twigg, Di ; Williams, Anne ; Rowbotham, Samantha ; Clarke, Sean. / Adding unregulated nursing support workers to ward staffing : Exploration of a natural experiment. In: Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2018 ; Vol. 27, No. 19-20. pp. 3768-3779.
@article{64f92360583741fdb56b1f52dfba451b,
title = "Adding unregulated nursing support workers to ward staffing: Exploration of a natural experiment",
abstract = "Aims and objectives: To explore the impact of an initiative to add unregulated nursing support workers to wards in acute care hospitals. Background: Adding nursing support workers to existing nurse staffing may be one solution to reduce nursing workloads and improve outcomes. However, the effects of this addition on nurse, patient and system outcomes are not well documented. In one state of Australia, a trial deployment of nursing support workers to wards across the public health system provided opportunity for the exploration of their impact in a natural, real-world, environment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A sample of five wards where nursing support workers had been added matched to a group of five wards where there were no nursing support workers. Data were collected via patient survey (n = 141) and nurse survey (n = 154). Analysis was comparative with regression models constructed for the different ward types. Results: Nursing leadership, staffing and resources, and nurse experience were linked to outcomes on both ward types. Instability was a significant predictor of reduced quality of care and increased turnover intention on wards where support workers were added. Conclusion: Adding nursing support workers to ward staffing did not lead to improvements in patient care. Findings suggest that staffing a nursing ward is a complex activity and that a simple approach to staffing is unlikely to be successful. Future research should explore the process of implementation and the conditions under which this strategy is likely to be successful. Relevance to clinical practice: Ward-level factors are key in making appropriate staffing and skill mix choices to limit instability and to consequently avoid negative patient, staff and system outcomes. Consideration of the ward context, alongside effective delegation processes and integration into the care team are imperative when adding nursing support workers.",
keywords = "model of care, nurse outcomes, patient outcomes, system outcomes, unregulated nursing support workers",
author = "Christine Duffield and Michael Roche and Di Twigg and Anne Williams and Samantha Rowbotham and Sean Clarke",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.14632",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "3768--3779",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "19-20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adding unregulated nursing support workers to ward staffing

T2 - Exploration of a natural experiment

AU - Duffield, Christine

AU - Roche, Michael

AU - Twigg, Di

AU - Williams, Anne

AU - Rowbotham, Samantha

AU - Clarke, Sean

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Aims and objectives: To explore the impact of an initiative to add unregulated nursing support workers to wards in acute care hospitals. Background: Adding nursing support workers to existing nurse staffing may be one solution to reduce nursing workloads and improve outcomes. However, the effects of this addition on nurse, patient and system outcomes are not well documented. In one state of Australia, a trial deployment of nursing support workers to wards across the public health system provided opportunity for the exploration of their impact in a natural, real-world, environment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A sample of five wards where nursing support workers had been added matched to a group of five wards where there were no nursing support workers. Data were collected via patient survey (n = 141) and nurse survey (n = 154). Analysis was comparative with regression models constructed for the different ward types. Results: Nursing leadership, staffing and resources, and nurse experience were linked to outcomes on both ward types. Instability was a significant predictor of reduced quality of care and increased turnover intention on wards where support workers were added. Conclusion: Adding nursing support workers to ward staffing did not lead to improvements in patient care. Findings suggest that staffing a nursing ward is a complex activity and that a simple approach to staffing is unlikely to be successful. Future research should explore the process of implementation and the conditions under which this strategy is likely to be successful. Relevance to clinical practice: Ward-level factors are key in making appropriate staffing and skill mix choices to limit instability and to consequently avoid negative patient, staff and system outcomes. Consideration of the ward context, alongside effective delegation processes and integration into the care team are imperative when adding nursing support workers.

AB - Aims and objectives: To explore the impact of an initiative to add unregulated nursing support workers to wards in acute care hospitals. Background: Adding nursing support workers to existing nurse staffing may be one solution to reduce nursing workloads and improve outcomes. However, the effects of this addition on nurse, patient and system outcomes are not well documented. In one state of Australia, a trial deployment of nursing support workers to wards across the public health system provided opportunity for the exploration of their impact in a natural, real-world, environment. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A sample of five wards where nursing support workers had been added matched to a group of five wards where there were no nursing support workers. Data were collected via patient survey (n = 141) and nurse survey (n = 154). Analysis was comparative with regression models constructed for the different ward types. Results: Nursing leadership, staffing and resources, and nurse experience were linked to outcomes on both ward types. Instability was a significant predictor of reduced quality of care and increased turnover intention on wards where support workers were added. Conclusion: Adding nursing support workers to ward staffing did not lead to improvements in patient care. Findings suggest that staffing a nursing ward is a complex activity and that a simple approach to staffing is unlikely to be successful. Future research should explore the process of implementation and the conditions under which this strategy is likely to be successful. Relevance to clinical practice: Ward-level factors are key in making appropriate staffing and skill mix choices to limit instability and to consequently avoid negative patient, staff and system outcomes. Consideration of the ward context, alongside effective delegation processes and integration into the care team are imperative when adding nursing support workers.

KW - model of care

KW - nurse outcomes

KW - patient outcomes

KW - system outcomes

KW - unregulated nursing support workers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052634290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052634290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.14632

DO - 10.1111/jocn.14632

M3 - Article

C2 - 30039531

AN - SCOPUS:85052634290

VL - 27

SP - 3768

EP - 3779

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 19-20

ER -