Addiction Research Training Programs: Four Case Studies and Recommendations for Evaluation

Aimee N.C. Campbell, Sudie E. Back, Jamie S. Ostroff, Denise A. Hien, Marc Gourevitch, Christine E. Sheffer, Kathleen T. Brady, Kathleen Hanley, Sewit Bereket, Sarah Book

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The presence of structured addiction research training programs helps to ensure that the scientific workforce includes well-trained, diverse scientists necessary to reduce the negative impact of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use disorders. Although the field has made significant progress in the development of standards for clinical training in addiction medicine, there remains significant room for improvement in the training of addiction researchers, and also opportunities to synergize across addiction research training programs. The purpose of this commentary is to describe 4 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored addiction research training programs, highlight critical components, and provide recommendations for more comprehensive and effective program evaluation. Moving forward, evaluation of addiction research training programs would be enhanced by the use of conceptual models to inform process and outcome evaluations, the application of innovative methods to ensure long-term data collection, the improvement of mentorship evaluation measures, and the integration of training methods from other fields of study. We encourage NIH and others in the field to be proactive in establishing core metrics for evaluation across programs. Furthermore, centralized tracking of NIH-funded addiction research trainees, analysis of aggregate data across programs, and innovative methods to effectively disseminate program materials and processes are recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-338
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Addiction Medicine
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Education
Program Evaluation
Research
Tobacco Use Disorder
Mentors
Substance-Related Disorders
Alcohols
Research Personnel
Medicine

Keywords

  • addiction education
  • addiction research training
  • graduate education
  • medical education
  • undergraduate education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Addiction Research Training Programs : Four Case Studies and Recommendations for Evaluation. / Campbell, Aimee N.C.; Back, Sudie E.; Ostroff, Jamie S.; Hien, Denise A.; Gourevitch, Marc; Sheffer, Christine E.; Brady, Kathleen T.; Hanley, Kathleen; Bereket, Sewit; Book, Sarah.

In: Journal of Addiction Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2017, p. 333-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Campbell, ANC, Back, SE, Ostroff, JS, Hien, DA, Gourevitch, M, Sheffer, CE, Brady, KT, Hanley, K, Bereket, S & Book, S 2017, 'Addiction Research Training Programs: Four Case Studies and Recommendations for Evaluation', Journal of Addiction Medicine, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000328
Campbell, Aimee N.C. ; Back, Sudie E. ; Ostroff, Jamie S. ; Hien, Denise A. ; Gourevitch, Marc ; Sheffer, Christine E. ; Brady, Kathleen T. ; Hanley, Kathleen ; Bereket, Sewit ; Book, Sarah. / Addiction Research Training Programs : Four Case Studies and Recommendations for Evaluation. In: Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 5. pp. 333-338.
@article{d6102deb9e22460a8c8e4c0cbaeb5ce6,
title = "Addiction Research Training Programs: Four Case Studies and Recommendations for Evaluation",
abstract = "The presence of structured addiction research training programs helps to ensure that the scientific workforce includes well-trained, diverse scientists necessary to reduce the negative impact of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use disorders. Although the field has made significant progress in the development of standards for clinical training in addiction medicine, there remains significant room for improvement in the training of addiction researchers, and also opportunities to synergize across addiction research training programs. The purpose of this commentary is to describe 4 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored addiction research training programs, highlight critical components, and provide recommendations for more comprehensive and effective program evaluation. Moving forward, evaluation of addiction research training programs would be enhanced by the use of conceptual models to inform process and outcome evaluations, the application of innovative methods to ensure long-term data collection, the improvement of mentorship evaluation measures, and the integration of training methods from other fields of study. We encourage NIH and others in the field to be proactive in establishing core metrics for evaluation across programs. Furthermore, centralized tracking of NIH-funded addiction research trainees, analysis of aggregate data across programs, and innovative methods to effectively disseminate program materials and processes are recommended.",
keywords = "addiction education, addiction research training, graduate education, medical education, undergraduate education",
author = "Campbell, {Aimee N.C.} and Back, {Sudie E.} and Ostroff, {Jamie S.} and Hien, {Denise A.} and Marc Gourevitch and Sheffer, {Christine E.} and Brady, {Kathleen T.} and Kathleen Hanley and Sewit Bereket and Sarah Book",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1097/ADM.0000000000000328",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "333--338",
journal = "Journal of Addiction Medicine",
issn = "1932-0620",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addiction Research Training Programs

T2 - Four Case Studies and Recommendations for Evaluation

AU - Campbell, Aimee N.C.

AU - Back, Sudie E.

AU - Ostroff, Jamie S.

AU - Hien, Denise A.

AU - Gourevitch, Marc

AU - Sheffer, Christine E.

AU - Brady, Kathleen T.

AU - Hanley, Kathleen

AU - Bereket, Sewit

AU - Book, Sarah

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The presence of structured addiction research training programs helps to ensure that the scientific workforce includes well-trained, diverse scientists necessary to reduce the negative impact of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use disorders. Although the field has made significant progress in the development of standards for clinical training in addiction medicine, there remains significant room for improvement in the training of addiction researchers, and also opportunities to synergize across addiction research training programs. The purpose of this commentary is to describe 4 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored addiction research training programs, highlight critical components, and provide recommendations for more comprehensive and effective program evaluation. Moving forward, evaluation of addiction research training programs would be enhanced by the use of conceptual models to inform process and outcome evaluations, the application of innovative methods to ensure long-term data collection, the improvement of mentorship evaluation measures, and the integration of training methods from other fields of study. We encourage NIH and others in the field to be proactive in establishing core metrics for evaluation across programs. Furthermore, centralized tracking of NIH-funded addiction research trainees, analysis of aggregate data across programs, and innovative methods to effectively disseminate program materials and processes are recommended.

AB - The presence of structured addiction research training programs helps to ensure that the scientific workforce includes well-trained, diverse scientists necessary to reduce the negative impact of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use disorders. Although the field has made significant progress in the development of standards for clinical training in addiction medicine, there remains significant room for improvement in the training of addiction researchers, and also opportunities to synergize across addiction research training programs. The purpose of this commentary is to describe 4 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored addiction research training programs, highlight critical components, and provide recommendations for more comprehensive and effective program evaluation. Moving forward, evaluation of addiction research training programs would be enhanced by the use of conceptual models to inform process and outcome evaluations, the application of innovative methods to ensure long-term data collection, the improvement of mentorship evaluation measures, and the integration of training methods from other fields of study. We encourage NIH and others in the field to be proactive in establishing core metrics for evaluation across programs. Furthermore, centralized tracking of NIH-funded addiction research trainees, analysis of aggregate data across programs, and innovative methods to effectively disseminate program materials and processes are recommended.

KW - addiction education

KW - addiction research training

KW - graduate education

KW - medical education

KW - undergraduate education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029774224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029774224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000328

DO - 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000328

M3 - Review article

VL - 11

SP - 333

EP - 338

JO - Journal of Addiction Medicine

JF - Journal of Addiction Medicine

SN - 1932-0620

IS - 5

ER -