Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation

Elizabeth J. Parks-Stamm, Peter Gollwitzer, Gabriele Oettingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Past research has demonstrated that implementation intentions (i.e., if-then plans) facilitate goal striving by two processes: increasing the activation of the anticipated situational cue (the if-process) and automating the goal-directed response to that cue (the then-process; Gollwitzer, 1999; Webb & Sheeran, in press). Two studies investigated the implications for the course of goal striving guided by implementation intentions. When implementation intentions achieved their effects by facilitating cue identification (the if-process), alternative cues were disregarded (Study 1). On the contrary, when implementation intentions achieved their effects by the automation of the critical response (the then-process), alternative goal-directed responses were still considered (Study 2). We discuss these results with respect to the functioning of implementation intentions and the use of alternative means in planned goal pursuit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-266
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Cues
Automation
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Action control by implementation intentions : Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. / Parks-Stamm, Elizabeth J.; Gollwitzer, Peter; Oettingen, Gabriele.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 25, No. 2, 04.2007, p. 248-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9bcd21e005bf45e3ad70db75ef48fa97,
title = "Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation",
abstract = "Past research has demonstrated that implementation intentions (i.e., if-then plans) facilitate goal striving by two processes: increasing the activation of the anticipated situational cue (the if-process) and automating the goal-directed response to that cue (the then-process; Gollwitzer, 1999; Webb & Sheeran, in press). Two studies investigated the implications for the course of goal striving guided by implementation intentions. When implementation intentions achieved their effects by facilitating cue identification (the if-process), alternative cues were disregarded (Study 1). On the contrary, when implementation intentions achieved their effects by the automation of the critical response (the then-process), alternative goal-directed responses were still considered (Study 2). We discuss these results with respect to the functioning of implementation intentions and the use of alternative means in planned goal pursuit.",
author = "Parks-Stamm, {Elizabeth J.} and Peter Gollwitzer and Gabriele Oettingen",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.248",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "248--266",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Action control by implementation intentions

T2 - Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation

AU - Parks-Stamm, Elizabeth J.

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

AU - Oettingen, Gabriele

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Past research has demonstrated that implementation intentions (i.e., if-then plans) facilitate goal striving by two processes: increasing the activation of the anticipated situational cue (the if-process) and automating the goal-directed response to that cue (the then-process; Gollwitzer, 1999; Webb & Sheeran, in press). Two studies investigated the implications for the course of goal striving guided by implementation intentions. When implementation intentions achieved their effects by facilitating cue identification (the if-process), alternative cues were disregarded (Study 1). On the contrary, when implementation intentions achieved their effects by the automation of the critical response (the then-process), alternative goal-directed responses were still considered (Study 2). We discuss these results with respect to the functioning of implementation intentions and the use of alternative means in planned goal pursuit.

AB - Past research has demonstrated that implementation intentions (i.e., if-then plans) facilitate goal striving by two processes: increasing the activation of the anticipated situational cue (the if-process) and automating the goal-directed response to that cue (the then-process; Gollwitzer, 1999; Webb & Sheeran, in press). Two studies investigated the implications for the course of goal striving guided by implementation intentions. When implementation intentions achieved their effects by facilitating cue identification (the if-process), alternative cues were disregarded (Study 1). On the contrary, when implementation intentions achieved their effects by the automation of the critical response (the then-process), alternative goal-directed responses were still considered (Study 2). We discuss these results with respect to the functioning of implementation intentions and the use of alternative means in planned goal pursuit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35548951745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35548951745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.248

DO - 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.248

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 248

EP - 266

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 2

ER -