Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology - The case for [long VOT]

Gillian Gallagher

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper argues that phonological features must represent both the articulatory and acoustic properties of speech sounds. Evidence for this claim comes from the long-distance restrictions on ejectives and aspirates in Quechua (MacEachern, Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions, Garland, 1999), which require both that ejectives and aspirates be referred to as a class and that they be distinguishable. The standard, articulatory features [constricted glottis] and [spread glottis] can distinguish ejectives and aspirates, but it is not possible to group these two types of segments in articulatory terms. While ejectives and aspirates are articulatorily disparate, they can be grouped in acoustic terms. Both types of segments are characterized by a long lag between the release of the oral constriction and the onset of voicing in a following sonorant, referred to by the proposed feature [long VOT]. Introducing acoustic features allows for a simple and restrictive account of the phonological behavior of laryngeally marked segments, both in Quechua and cross-linguistically.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)281-313
    Number of pages33
    JournalLinguistic Review
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2011

    Fingerprint

    phonology
    acoustics
    evidence
    Acoustics
    Phonology
    Ejectives
    Group
    Glottis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language

    Cite this

    Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology - The case for [long VOT]. / Gallagher, Gillian.

    In: Linguistic Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, 09.2011, p. 281-313.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Gallagher, Gillian. / Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology - The case for [long VOT]. In: Linguistic Review. 2011 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 281-313.
    @article{09b5b0ebac9c4d36b1281c4c1bed8338,
    title = "Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology - The case for [long VOT]",
    abstract = "This paper argues that phonological features must represent both the articulatory and acoustic properties of speech sounds. Evidence for this claim comes from the long-distance restrictions on ejectives and aspirates in Quechua (MacEachern, Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions, Garland, 1999), which require both that ejectives and aspirates be referred to as a class and that they be distinguishable. The standard, articulatory features [constricted glottis] and [spread glottis] can distinguish ejectives and aspirates, but it is not possible to group these two types of segments in articulatory terms. While ejectives and aspirates are articulatorily disparate, they can be grouped in acoustic terms. Both types of segments are characterized by a long lag between the release of the oral constriction and the onset of voicing in a following sonorant, referred to by the proposed feature [long VOT]. Introducing acoustic features allows for a simple and restrictive account of the phonological behavior of laryngeally marked segments, both in Quechua and cross-linguistically.",
    author = "Gillian Gallagher",
    year = "2011",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1515/tlir.2011.008",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "281--313",
    journal = "Linguistic Review",
    issn = "0167-6318",
    publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology - The case for [long VOT]

    AU - Gallagher, Gillian

    PY - 2011/9

    Y1 - 2011/9

    N2 - This paper argues that phonological features must represent both the articulatory and acoustic properties of speech sounds. Evidence for this claim comes from the long-distance restrictions on ejectives and aspirates in Quechua (MacEachern, Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions, Garland, 1999), which require both that ejectives and aspirates be referred to as a class and that they be distinguishable. The standard, articulatory features [constricted glottis] and [spread glottis] can distinguish ejectives and aspirates, but it is not possible to group these two types of segments in articulatory terms. While ejectives and aspirates are articulatorily disparate, they can be grouped in acoustic terms. Both types of segments are characterized by a long lag between the release of the oral constriction and the onset of voicing in a following sonorant, referred to by the proposed feature [long VOT]. Introducing acoustic features allows for a simple and restrictive account of the phonological behavior of laryngeally marked segments, both in Quechua and cross-linguistically.

    AB - This paper argues that phonological features must represent both the articulatory and acoustic properties of speech sounds. Evidence for this claim comes from the long-distance restrictions on ejectives and aspirates in Quechua (MacEachern, Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions, Garland, 1999), which require both that ejectives and aspirates be referred to as a class and that they be distinguishable. The standard, articulatory features [constricted glottis] and [spread glottis] can distinguish ejectives and aspirates, but it is not possible to group these two types of segments in articulatory terms. While ejectives and aspirates are articulatorily disparate, they can be grouped in acoustic terms. Both types of segments are characterized by a long lag between the release of the oral constriction and the onset of voicing in a following sonorant, referred to by the proposed feature [long VOT]. Introducing acoustic features allows for a simple and restrictive account of the phonological behavior of laryngeally marked segments, both in Quechua and cross-linguistically.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82055181914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82055181914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1515/tlir.2011.008

    DO - 10.1515/tlir.2011.008

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:82055181914

    VL - 28

    SP - 281

    EP - 313

    JO - Linguistic Review

    JF - Linguistic Review

    SN - 0167-6318

    IS - 3

    ER -