Access and the choice of transit technology

Karthik Sivakumaran, Yuwei Li, Michael Cassidy, Samer Madanat

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    An urban transit system can be made more cost-efficient by improving the access to it. Efforts in this vein often entail the provision of greater mobility, as when high-speed feeder buses are used to carry commuters to and from trunk-line stations. Other efforts have focused on the creation of more favorable land-use patterns, as occurs when households within a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) are tightly clustered around trunk stations. The efficacy of these mobility and land-use solutions are separately examined in the present work. To this end, continuum approximation models are used to design idealized transit systems that minimize the generalized costs to both the users and the operators of those systems.The assessments unveil how the choice of transit technology for the trunk-line portion of a transit network can be influenced by its access mode. If transit is accessed solely (and slowly) on foot, then the optimal spacings between lines, and between the stations along those lines, are small. This can place capital-intensive rail systems at a competitive disadvantage with transit systems that feature buses instead. When access speeds increase, the optimal spacings between lines and stations expand. Hence, if accessed by fast-moving feeder buses, Metro-rail or bus-rapid transit can become preferred trunk-line options.By comparison, the influence of altered land use patterns brought by TODs tends to be less dramatic. We find that clustering households around Metro-rail stations justifies larger spacings between the stations. Yet, this produces only modest reductions in generalized costs because the larger spacings penalize transit users who reside outside of the TODs.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)204-221
    Number of pages18
    JournalTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
    Volume59
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

    Fingerprint

    Land use
    Rails
    land use
    Costs
    Rapid transit
    costs
    commuter
    Bus
    Rail

    Keywords

    • Feeder
    • Transit
    • Transit-oriented development
    • Trunk

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Civil and Structural Engineering
    • Transportation
    • Management Science and Operations Research

    Cite this

    Access and the choice of transit technology. / Sivakumaran, Karthik; Li, Yuwei; Cassidy, Michael; Madanat, Samer.

    In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 59, 01.01.2014, p. 204-221.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Sivakumaran, Karthik ; Li, Yuwei ; Cassidy, Michael ; Madanat, Samer. / Access and the choice of transit technology. In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 59. pp. 204-221.
    @article{f53489ee557b4642bf54cc7b00b1c3d7,
    title = "Access and the choice of transit technology",
    abstract = "An urban transit system can be made more cost-efficient by improving the access to it. Efforts in this vein often entail the provision of greater mobility, as when high-speed feeder buses are used to carry commuters to and from trunk-line stations. Other efforts have focused on the creation of more favorable land-use patterns, as occurs when households within a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) are tightly clustered around trunk stations. The efficacy of these mobility and land-use solutions are separately examined in the present work. To this end, continuum approximation models are used to design idealized transit systems that minimize the generalized costs to both the users and the operators of those systems.The assessments unveil how the choice of transit technology for the trunk-line portion of a transit network can be influenced by its access mode. If transit is accessed solely (and slowly) on foot, then the optimal spacings between lines, and between the stations along those lines, are small. This can place capital-intensive rail systems at a competitive disadvantage with transit systems that feature buses instead. When access speeds increase, the optimal spacings between lines and stations expand. Hence, if accessed by fast-moving feeder buses, Metro-rail or bus-rapid transit can become preferred trunk-line options.By comparison, the influence of altered land use patterns brought by TODs tends to be less dramatic. We find that clustering households around Metro-rail stations justifies larger spacings between the stations. Yet, this produces only modest reductions in generalized costs because the larger spacings penalize transit users who reside outside of the TODs.",
    keywords = "Feeder, Transit, Transit-oriented development, Trunk",
    author = "Karthik Sivakumaran and Yuwei Li and Michael Cassidy and Samer Madanat",
    year = "2014",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.006",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "59",
    pages = "204--221",
    journal = "Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice",
    issn = "0965-8564",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Access and the choice of transit technology

    AU - Sivakumaran, Karthik

    AU - Li, Yuwei

    AU - Cassidy, Michael

    AU - Madanat, Samer

    PY - 2014/1/1

    Y1 - 2014/1/1

    N2 - An urban transit system can be made more cost-efficient by improving the access to it. Efforts in this vein often entail the provision of greater mobility, as when high-speed feeder buses are used to carry commuters to and from trunk-line stations. Other efforts have focused on the creation of more favorable land-use patterns, as occurs when households within a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) are tightly clustered around trunk stations. The efficacy of these mobility and land-use solutions are separately examined in the present work. To this end, continuum approximation models are used to design idealized transit systems that minimize the generalized costs to both the users and the operators of those systems.The assessments unveil how the choice of transit technology for the trunk-line portion of a transit network can be influenced by its access mode. If transit is accessed solely (and slowly) on foot, then the optimal spacings between lines, and between the stations along those lines, are small. This can place capital-intensive rail systems at a competitive disadvantage with transit systems that feature buses instead. When access speeds increase, the optimal spacings between lines and stations expand. Hence, if accessed by fast-moving feeder buses, Metro-rail or bus-rapid transit can become preferred trunk-line options.By comparison, the influence of altered land use patterns brought by TODs tends to be less dramatic. We find that clustering households around Metro-rail stations justifies larger spacings between the stations. Yet, this produces only modest reductions in generalized costs because the larger spacings penalize transit users who reside outside of the TODs.

    AB - An urban transit system can be made more cost-efficient by improving the access to it. Efforts in this vein often entail the provision of greater mobility, as when high-speed feeder buses are used to carry commuters to and from trunk-line stations. Other efforts have focused on the creation of more favorable land-use patterns, as occurs when households within a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) are tightly clustered around trunk stations. The efficacy of these mobility and land-use solutions are separately examined in the present work. To this end, continuum approximation models are used to design idealized transit systems that minimize the generalized costs to both the users and the operators of those systems.The assessments unveil how the choice of transit technology for the trunk-line portion of a transit network can be influenced by its access mode. If transit is accessed solely (and slowly) on foot, then the optimal spacings between lines, and between the stations along those lines, are small. This can place capital-intensive rail systems at a competitive disadvantage with transit systems that feature buses instead. When access speeds increase, the optimal spacings between lines and stations expand. Hence, if accessed by fast-moving feeder buses, Metro-rail or bus-rapid transit can become preferred trunk-line options.By comparison, the influence of altered land use patterns brought by TODs tends to be less dramatic. We find that clustering households around Metro-rail stations justifies larger spacings between the stations. Yet, this produces only modest reductions in generalized costs because the larger spacings penalize transit users who reside outside of the TODs.

    KW - Feeder

    KW - Transit

    KW - Transit-oriented development

    KW - Trunk

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890852332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890852332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.006

    DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2013.09.006

    M3 - Article

    VL - 59

    SP - 204

    EP - 221

    JO - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

    JF - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

    SN - 0965-8564

    ER -