A theory of categorical terrorism

Jeffrey Goodwin

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    When revolutionaries or insurgents, broadly defined, indiscriminately attack civilians, they generally attack "complicitous civilians," i.e., those categories of noncombatants which the revolutionaries see as benefiting from, supporting and/or having a substantial capacity to influence the states that the revolutionaries are attempting to displace or overthrow. Such "categorical" terrorism will be most extensive when revolutionaries view these states (or complicitous civilians themselves) as perpetrators of extensive, indiscriminate violence against the revolutionaries and their constituents. However, if significant numbers of complicitous civilians are seen by rebel groups as potential supporters (or as capable of being influenced by nonviolent appeals or protests), then they will not be indiscriminately attacked. Whether specific categories of civilians will be perceived as potential allies by revolutionaries depends mainly on the prior history of political interaction and cooperation between these civilians and the revolutionaries. Categorical terrorism is most likely where there has been little such interaction or cooperation, resulting in weak political alliances between the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians - for example, where the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians speak different languages, practice different religions, claim the same land, and/or are territorially segregated.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)2027-2046
    Number of pages20
    JournalSocial Forces
    Volume84
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2006

    Fingerprint

    terrorism
    political alliance
    interaction
    allies
    protest
    appeal
    Religion
    violence
    history
    language
    Group
    Revolution
    Categorical
    Terrorism

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    A theory of categorical terrorism. / Goodwin, Jeffrey.

    In: Social Forces, Vol. 84, No. 4, 06.2006, p. 2027-2046.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Goodwin, Jeffrey. / A theory of categorical terrorism. In: Social Forces. 2006 ; Vol. 84, No. 4. pp. 2027-2046.
    @article{e88e6e18d9ce4738b57a2ac50d0f7815,
    title = "A theory of categorical terrorism",
    abstract = "When revolutionaries or insurgents, broadly defined, indiscriminately attack civilians, they generally attack {"}complicitous civilians,{"} i.e., those categories of noncombatants which the revolutionaries see as benefiting from, supporting and/or having a substantial capacity to influence the states that the revolutionaries are attempting to displace or overthrow. Such {"}categorical{"} terrorism will be most extensive when revolutionaries view these states (or complicitous civilians themselves) as perpetrators of extensive, indiscriminate violence against the revolutionaries and their constituents. However, if significant numbers of complicitous civilians are seen by rebel groups as potential supporters (or as capable of being influenced by nonviolent appeals or protests), then they will not be indiscriminately attacked. Whether specific categories of civilians will be perceived as potential allies by revolutionaries depends mainly on the prior history of political interaction and cooperation between these civilians and the revolutionaries. Categorical terrorism is most likely where there has been little such interaction or cooperation, resulting in weak political alliances between the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians - for example, where the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians speak different languages, practice different religions, claim the same land, and/or are territorially segregated.",
    author = "Jeffrey Goodwin",
    year = "2006",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1353/sof.2006.0090",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "84",
    pages = "2027--2046",
    journal = "Social Forces",
    issn = "0037-7732",
    publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A theory of categorical terrorism

    AU - Goodwin, Jeffrey

    PY - 2006/6

    Y1 - 2006/6

    N2 - When revolutionaries or insurgents, broadly defined, indiscriminately attack civilians, they generally attack "complicitous civilians," i.e., those categories of noncombatants which the revolutionaries see as benefiting from, supporting and/or having a substantial capacity to influence the states that the revolutionaries are attempting to displace or overthrow. Such "categorical" terrorism will be most extensive when revolutionaries view these states (or complicitous civilians themselves) as perpetrators of extensive, indiscriminate violence against the revolutionaries and their constituents. However, if significant numbers of complicitous civilians are seen by rebel groups as potential supporters (or as capable of being influenced by nonviolent appeals or protests), then they will not be indiscriminately attacked. Whether specific categories of civilians will be perceived as potential allies by revolutionaries depends mainly on the prior history of political interaction and cooperation between these civilians and the revolutionaries. Categorical terrorism is most likely where there has been little such interaction or cooperation, resulting in weak political alliances between the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians - for example, where the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians speak different languages, practice different religions, claim the same land, and/or are territorially segregated.

    AB - When revolutionaries or insurgents, broadly defined, indiscriminately attack civilians, they generally attack "complicitous civilians," i.e., those categories of noncombatants which the revolutionaries see as benefiting from, supporting and/or having a substantial capacity to influence the states that the revolutionaries are attempting to displace or overthrow. Such "categorical" terrorism will be most extensive when revolutionaries view these states (or complicitous civilians themselves) as perpetrators of extensive, indiscriminate violence against the revolutionaries and their constituents. However, if significant numbers of complicitous civilians are seen by rebel groups as potential supporters (or as capable of being influenced by nonviolent appeals or protests), then they will not be indiscriminately attacked. Whether specific categories of civilians will be perceived as potential allies by revolutionaries depends mainly on the prior history of political interaction and cooperation between these civilians and the revolutionaries. Categorical terrorism is most likely where there has been little such interaction or cooperation, resulting in weak political alliances between the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians - for example, where the revolutionaries and complicitous civilians speak different languages, practice different religions, claim the same land, and/or are territorially segregated.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745944871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745944871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1353/sof.2006.0090

    DO - 10.1353/sof.2006.0090

    M3 - Review article

    AN - SCOPUS:33745944871

    VL - 84

    SP - 2027

    EP - 2046

    JO - Social Forces

    JF - Social Forces

    SN - 0037-7732

    IS - 4

    ER -