A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of september 11, 2001

Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events

William Hirst, Elizabeth A. Phelps, Robert Meksin, Chandan J. Vaidya, Marcia K. Johnson, Karen J. Mitchell, Randy L. Buckner, Andrew E. Budson, John D E Gabrieli, Cindy Lustig, Mara Mather, Kevin N. Ochsner, Daniel Schacter, Jon S. Simons, Keith B. Lyle, Alexandru F. Cuc, Andreas Olsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Within a week of the attack of September 11, 2001, a consortium of researchers from across the United States distributed a survey asking about the circumstances in which respondents learned of the attack (their flashbulb memories) and the facts about the attack itself (their event memories). Follow-up surveys were distributed 11, 25, and 119 months after the attack. The study, therefore, examines retention of flashbulb memories and event memories at a substantially longer retention interval than any previous study using a test-retest methodology, allowing for the study of such memories over the long term. There was rapid forgetting of both flashbulb and event memories within the first year, but the forgetting curves leveled off after that, not significantly changing even after a 10-year delay. Despite the initial rapid forgetting, confidence remained high throughout the 10-year period. Five putative factors affecting flashbulb memory consistency and event memory accuracy were examined: (a) attention to media, (b) the amount of discussion, (c) residency, (d) personal loss and/or inconvenience, and (e) emotional intensity. After 10 years, none of these factors predicted flashbulb memory consistency; media attention and ensuing conversation predicted event memory accuracy. Inconsistent flashbulb memories were more likely to be repeated rather than corrected over the 10-year period; inaccurate event memories, however, were more likely to be corrected. The findings suggest that even traumatic memories and those implicated in a community's collective identity may be inconsistent over time and these inconsistencies can persist without the corrective force of external influences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)604-623
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume144
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Attack
September 11 Attacks
Event Memory
Long-Term Memory
Internship and Residency
Forgetting
Research Personnel
Surveys and Questionnaires
Retention (Psychology)
Confidence
Emotion
Methodology
Inconsistency
Collective Identity

Keywords

  • Autobiographical memories
  • Collective memories
  • Event memories
  • Flashbulb memories
  • September 11

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of september 11, 2001 : Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events. / Hirst, William; Phelps, Elizabeth A.; Meksin, Robert; Vaidya, Chandan J.; Johnson, Marcia K.; Mitchell, Karen J.; Buckner, Randy L.; Budson, Andrew E.; Gabrieli, John D E; Lustig, Cindy; Mather, Mara; Ochsner, Kevin N.; Schacter, Daniel; Simons, Jon S.; Lyle, Keith B.; Cuc, Alexandru F.; Olsson, Andreas.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 144, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 604-623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirst, W, Phelps, EA, Meksin, R, Vaidya, CJ, Johnson, MK, Mitchell, KJ, Buckner, RL, Budson, AE, Gabrieli, JDE, Lustig, C, Mather, M, Ochsner, KN, Schacter, D, Simons, JS, Lyle, KB, Cuc, AF & Olsson, A 2015, 'A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of september 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events', Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 604-623. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000055
Hirst, William ; Phelps, Elizabeth A. ; Meksin, Robert ; Vaidya, Chandan J. ; Johnson, Marcia K. ; Mitchell, Karen J. ; Buckner, Randy L. ; Budson, Andrew E. ; Gabrieli, John D E ; Lustig, Cindy ; Mather, Mara ; Ochsner, Kevin N. ; Schacter, Daniel ; Simons, Jon S. ; Lyle, Keith B. ; Cuc, Alexandru F. ; Olsson, Andreas. / A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of september 11, 2001 : Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2015 ; Vol. 144, No. 3. pp. 604-623.
@article{e7f5ced1eef44bc596493ddc46bf9481,
title = "A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of september 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events",
abstract = "Within a week of the attack of September 11, 2001, a consortium of researchers from across the United States distributed a survey asking about the circumstances in which respondents learned of the attack (their flashbulb memories) and the facts about the attack itself (their event memories). Follow-up surveys were distributed 11, 25, and 119 months after the attack. The study, therefore, examines retention of flashbulb memories and event memories at a substantially longer retention interval than any previous study using a test-retest methodology, allowing for the study of such memories over the long term. There was rapid forgetting of both flashbulb and event memories within the first year, but the forgetting curves leveled off after that, not significantly changing even after a 10-year delay. Despite the initial rapid forgetting, confidence remained high throughout the 10-year period. Five putative factors affecting flashbulb memory consistency and event memory accuracy were examined: (a) attention to media, (b) the amount of discussion, (c) residency, (d) personal loss and/or inconvenience, and (e) emotional intensity. After 10 years, none of these factors predicted flashbulb memory consistency; media attention and ensuing conversation predicted event memory accuracy. Inconsistent flashbulb memories were more likely to be repeated rather than corrected over the 10-year period; inaccurate event memories, however, were more likely to be corrected. The findings suggest that even traumatic memories and those implicated in a community's collective identity may be inconsistent over time and these inconsistencies can persist without the corrective force of external influences.",
keywords = "Autobiographical memories, Collective memories, Event memories, Flashbulb memories, September 11",
author = "William Hirst and Phelps, {Elizabeth A.} and Robert Meksin and Vaidya, {Chandan J.} and Johnson, {Marcia K.} and Mitchell, {Karen J.} and Buckner, {Randy L.} and Budson, {Andrew E.} and Gabrieli, {John D E} and Cindy Lustig and Mara Mather and Ochsner, {Kevin N.} and Daniel Schacter and Simons, {Jon S.} and Lyle, {Keith B.} and Cuc, {Alexandru F.} and Andreas Olsson",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xge0000055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "604--623",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of september 11, 2001

T2 - Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events

AU - Hirst, William

AU - Phelps, Elizabeth A.

AU - Meksin, Robert

AU - Vaidya, Chandan J.

AU - Johnson, Marcia K.

AU - Mitchell, Karen J.

AU - Buckner, Randy L.

AU - Budson, Andrew E.

AU - Gabrieli, John D E

AU - Lustig, Cindy

AU - Mather, Mara

AU - Ochsner, Kevin N.

AU - Schacter, Daniel

AU - Simons, Jon S.

AU - Lyle, Keith B.

AU - Cuc, Alexandru F.

AU - Olsson, Andreas

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Within a week of the attack of September 11, 2001, a consortium of researchers from across the United States distributed a survey asking about the circumstances in which respondents learned of the attack (their flashbulb memories) and the facts about the attack itself (their event memories). Follow-up surveys were distributed 11, 25, and 119 months after the attack. The study, therefore, examines retention of flashbulb memories and event memories at a substantially longer retention interval than any previous study using a test-retest methodology, allowing for the study of such memories over the long term. There was rapid forgetting of both flashbulb and event memories within the first year, but the forgetting curves leveled off after that, not significantly changing even after a 10-year delay. Despite the initial rapid forgetting, confidence remained high throughout the 10-year period. Five putative factors affecting flashbulb memory consistency and event memory accuracy were examined: (a) attention to media, (b) the amount of discussion, (c) residency, (d) personal loss and/or inconvenience, and (e) emotional intensity. After 10 years, none of these factors predicted flashbulb memory consistency; media attention and ensuing conversation predicted event memory accuracy. Inconsistent flashbulb memories were more likely to be repeated rather than corrected over the 10-year period; inaccurate event memories, however, were more likely to be corrected. The findings suggest that even traumatic memories and those implicated in a community's collective identity may be inconsistent over time and these inconsistencies can persist without the corrective force of external influences.

AB - Within a week of the attack of September 11, 2001, a consortium of researchers from across the United States distributed a survey asking about the circumstances in which respondents learned of the attack (their flashbulb memories) and the facts about the attack itself (their event memories). Follow-up surveys were distributed 11, 25, and 119 months after the attack. The study, therefore, examines retention of flashbulb memories and event memories at a substantially longer retention interval than any previous study using a test-retest methodology, allowing for the study of such memories over the long term. There was rapid forgetting of both flashbulb and event memories within the first year, but the forgetting curves leveled off after that, not significantly changing even after a 10-year delay. Despite the initial rapid forgetting, confidence remained high throughout the 10-year period. Five putative factors affecting flashbulb memory consistency and event memory accuracy were examined: (a) attention to media, (b) the amount of discussion, (c) residency, (d) personal loss and/or inconvenience, and (e) emotional intensity. After 10 years, none of these factors predicted flashbulb memory consistency; media attention and ensuing conversation predicted event memory accuracy. Inconsistent flashbulb memories were more likely to be repeated rather than corrected over the 10-year period; inaccurate event memories, however, were more likely to be corrected. The findings suggest that even traumatic memories and those implicated in a community's collective identity may be inconsistent over time and these inconsistencies can persist without the corrective force of external influences.

KW - Autobiographical memories

KW - Collective memories

KW - Event memories

KW - Flashbulb memories

KW - September 11

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930823711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930823711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xge0000055

DO - 10.1037/xge0000055

M3 - Article

VL - 144

SP - 604

EP - 623

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 3

ER -