A Summary of What We Know about Social Mobility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Academic research on social mobility from the 1960s until now has made several facts clear. First, and most important, it is better to ask how the conditions and circumstances of early life constrain adult success than to ask who is moving up and who is not. The focus on origins keeps the substantive issues of opportunity and fairness in focus, while the mobility question leads to confusing side issues. Second, mobility is intrinsically symmetrical; each upward move is offset by a downward move in the absence of growth, expansion, or immigration. Third, social origins are not a single dimension of inequality that can be paired with the outcome of interest (without significant excluded variable bias); they are a comprehensive set of conditions describing the circumstances of youth. Fourth, the constraints of social origins vary by time, place, and subpopulation. These four “knowns” should inform any attempt to collect new data on mobility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-36
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume657
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 19 2015

Fingerprint

Social Mobility
fairness
immigration
trend

Keywords

  • Life chances
  • Opportunity
  • Social mobility
  • Social origins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

A Summary of What We Know about Social Mobility. / Hout, Michael.

In: Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 657, No. 1, 19.01.2015, p. 27-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3bbd157910704c8c95ba4aeea4891bfc,
title = "A Summary of What We Know about Social Mobility",
abstract = "Academic research on social mobility from the 1960s until now has made several facts clear. First, and most important, it is better to ask how the conditions and circumstances of early life constrain adult success than to ask who is moving up and who is not. The focus on origins keeps the substantive issues of opportunity and fairness in focus, while the mobility question leads to confusing side issues. Second, mobility is intrinsically symmetrical; each upward move is offset by a downward move in the absence of growth, expansion, or immigration. Third, social origins are not a single dimension of inequality that can be paired with the outcome of interest (without significant excluded variable bias); they are a comprehensive set of conditions describing the circumstances of youth. Fourth, the constraints of social origins vary by time, place, and subpopulation. These four “knowns” should inform any attempt to collect new data on mobility.",
keywords = "Life chances, Opportunity, Social mobility, Social origins",
author = "Michael Hout",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1177/0002716214547174",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "657",
pages = "27--36",
journal = "Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science",
issn = "0002-7162",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Summary of What We Know about Social Mobility

AU - Hout, Michael

PY - 2015/1/19

Y1 - 2015/1/19

N2 - Academic research on social mobility from the 1960s until now has made several facts clear. First, and most important, it is better to ask how the conditions and circumstances of early life constrain adult success than to ask who is moving up and who is not. The focus on origins keeps the substantive issues of opportunity and fairness in focus, while the mobility question leads to confusing side issues. Second, mobility is intrinsically symmetrical; each upward move is offset by a downward move in the absence of growth, expansion, or immigration. Third, social origins are not a single dimension of inequality that can be paired with the outcome of interest (without significant excluded variable bias); they are a comprehensive set of conditions describing the circumstances of youth. Fourth, the constraints of social origins vary by time, place, and subpopulation. These four “knowns” should inform any attempt to collect new data on mobility.

AB - Academic research on social mobility from the 1960s until now has made several facts clear. First, and most important, it is better to ask how the conditions and circumstances of early life constrain adult success than to ask who is moving up and who is not. The focus on origins keeps the substantive issues of opportunity and fairness in focus, while the mobility question leads to confusing side issues. Second, mobility is intrinsically symmetrical; each upward move is offset by a downward move in the absence of growth, expansion, or immigration. Third, social origins are not a single dimension of inequality that can be paired with the outcome of interest (without significant excluded variable bias); they are a comprehensive set of conditions describing the circumstances of youth. Fourth, the constraints of social origins vary by time, place, and subpopulation. These four “knowns” should inform any attempt to collect new data on mobility.

KW - Life chances

KW - Opportunity

KW - Social mobility

KW - Social origins

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919430644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919430644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0002716214547174

DO - 10.1177/0002716214547174

M3 - Article

VL - 657

SP - 27

EP - 36

JO - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

JF - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

SN - 0002-7162

IS - 1

ER -