A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows

Sharon Favaro Ince, Christopher Hoadley, Paul A. Kirschner

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Search, especially library search, is a distinct part of the research process which can be taught and supported separately from the scholarly processes of knowledge creation. We interviewed eight early career researchers (ECRs) composed of doctoral students or recent graduates about their overall scholarly workflows including not only search but also social networking around scholarly information and production of scholarly works. Evidence suggests that search itself is less discrete and library-centric than prior models may have suggested, and that students use both social resources and non-library technologies to discover and locate scholarly works. We argue that taking a workflow-centric and collaboration-centric view, rather than a search-centric view, should inform design of tools and training for search of scholarly resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Pages245-248
Number of pages4
Volume2018-March
ISBN (Electronic)9781450349253
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018
Event3rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR 2018 - New Brunswick, United States
Duration: Mar 11 2018Mar 15 2018

Other

Other3rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR 2018
CountryUnited States
CityNew Brunswick
Period3/11/183/15/18

Fingerprint

Students

Keywords

  • Academic librarianship
  • Graduate Students
  • Information Literacy
  • Scholarly workflow
  • Search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Information Systems

Cite this

Ince, S. F., Hoadley, C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows. In CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (Vol. 2018-March, pp. 245-248). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176877

A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows. / Ince, Sharon Favaro; Hoadley, Christopher; Kirschner, Paul A.

CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. Vol. 2018-March Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2018. p. 245-248.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ince, SF, Hoadley, C & Kirschner, PA 2018, A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows. in CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. vol. 2018-March, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp. 245-248, 3rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR 2018, New Brunswick, United States, 3/11/18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176877
Ince SF, Hoadley C, Kirschner PA. A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows. In CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. Vol. 2018-March. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. 2018. p. 245-248 https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176877
Ince, Sharon Favaro ; Hoadley, Christopher ; Kirschner, Paul A. / A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows. CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. Vol. 2018-March Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2018. pp. 245-248
@inproceedings{6ae8105617cf47cf8eaeab7c86e221be,
title = "A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows",
abstract = "Search, especially library search, is a distinct part of the research process which can be taught and supported separately from the scholarly processes of knowledge creation. We interviewed eight early career researchers (ECRs) composed of doctoral students or recent graduates about their overall scholarly workflows including not only search but also social networking around scholarly information and production of scholarly works. Evidence suggests that search itself is less discrete and library-centric than prior models may have suggested, and that students use both social resources and non-library technologies to discover and locate scholarly works. We argue that taking a workflow-centric and collaboration-centric view, rather than a search-centric view, should inform design of tools and training for search of scholarly resources.",
keywords = "Academic librarianship, Graduate Students, Information Literacy, Scholarly workflow, Search",
author = "Ince, {Sharon Favaro} and Christopher Hoadley and Kirschner, {Paul A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1145/3176349.3176877",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2018-March",
pages = "245--248",
booktitle = "CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A study of search practices in doctoral student scholarly workflows

AU - Ince, Sharon Favaro

AU - Hoadley, Christopher

AU - Kirschner, Paul A.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Search, especially library search, is a distinct part of the research process which can be taught and supported separately from the scholarly processes of knowledge creation. We interviewed eight early career researchers (ECRs) composed of doctoral students or recent graduates about their overall scholarly workflows including not only search but also social networking around scholarly information and production of scholarly works. Evidence suggests that search itself is less discrete and library-centric than prior models may have suggested, and that students use both social resources and non-library technologies to discover and locate scholarly works. We argue that taking a workflow-centric and collaboration-centric view, rather than a search-centric view, should inform design of tools and training for search of scholarly resources.

AB - Search, especially library search, is a distinct part of the research process which can be taught and supported separately from the scholarly processes of knowledge creation. We interviewed eight early career researchers (ECRs) composed of doctoral students or recent graduates about their overall scholarly workflows including not only search but also social networking around scholarly information and production of scholarly works. Evidence suggests that search itself is less discrete and library-centric than prior models may have suggested, and that students use both social resources and non-library technologies to discover and locate scholarly works. We argue that taking a workflow-centric and collaboration-centric view, rather than a search-centric view, should inform design of tools and training for search of scholarly resources.

KW - Academic librarianship

KW - Graduate Students

KW - Information Literacy

KW - Scholarly workflow

KW - Search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052024926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052024926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3176349.3176877

DO - 10.1145/3176349.3176877

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85052024926

VL - 2018-March

SP - 245

EP - 248

BT - CHIIR 2018 - Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc

ER -