A robust automated method to analyze rodent motion during fear conditioning

Charles D. Kopec, H. W H G Kessels, D. E A Bush, Christopher K. Cain, Joseph Ledoux, Roberto Malinow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A central question in the study of LTP has been to determine what role it plays in memory formation and storage. One valuable form of learning for addressing this issue is associative fear conditioning. In this paradigm an animal learns to associate a tone and shock, such that subsequent presentation of a tone evokes a fear response (freezing behavior). Recent studies indicate that overlapping cellular processes underlie fear conditioning and LTP. The fear response has generally been scored manually which is both labor-intensive and subject to potential artifacts such as inconsistent or biased results. Here we describe a simple automated method that provides unbiased and rapid analysis of animal motion. We show that measured motion, in units termed significant motion pixels (SMPs), is both linear and robust over a wide range of animal speeds and detection thresholds and scores freezing in a quantitatively similar manner to trained human observers. By comparing the frequency distribution of motion during baseline periods and to the response to fox urine (which causes unconditioned fear), we suggest that freezing and non-freezing are distinct behaviors. Finally, we show how this algorithm can be applied to a fear conditioning paradigm yielding information on long and short-term associative memory as well as habituation. This automated analysis of fear conditioning will permit a more rapid and accurate assessment of the role of LTP in memory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)228-233
Number of pages6
JournalNeuropharmacology
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Fear
Rodentia
Freezing
Conditioning (Psychology)
Short-Term Memory
Artifacts
Shock
Learning
Urine

Keywords

  • Automated
  • Behavior
  • Fear conditioning
  • Long-term potentiation
  • Memory
  • Motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Drug Discovery
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Kopec, C. D., Kessels, H. W. H. G., Bush, D. E. A., Cain, C. K., Ledoux, J., & Malinow, R. (2007). A robust automated method to analyze rodent motion during fear conditioning. Neuropharmacology, 52(1), 228-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.028

A robust automated method to analyze rodent motion during fear conditioning. / Kopec, Charles D.; Kessels, H. W H G; Bush, D. E A; Cain, Christopher K.; Ledoux, Joseph; Malinow, Roberto.

In: Neuropharmacology, Vol. 52, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 228-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kopec, Charles D. ; Kessels, H. W H G ; Bush, D. E A ; Cain, Christopher K. ; Ledoux, Joseph ; Malinow, Roberto. / A robust automated method to analyze rodent motion during fear conditioning. In: Neuropharmacology. 2007 ; Vol. 52, No. 1. pp. 228-233.
@article{6ad1b247a1cb41b9abbcbb68573321bf,
title = "A robust automated method to analyze rodent motion during fear conditioning",
abstract = "A central question in the study of LTP has been to determine what role it plays in memory formation and storage. One valuable form of learning for addressing this issue is associative fear conditioning. In this paradigm an animal learns to associate a tone and shock, such that subsequent presentation of a tone evokes a fear response (freezing behavior). Recent studies indicate that overlapping cellular processes underlie fear conditioning and LTP. The fear response has generally been scored manually which is both labor-intensive and subject to potential artifacts such as inconsistent or biased results. Here we describe a simple automated method that provides unbiased and rapid analysis of animal motion. We show that measured motion, in units termed significant motion pixels (SMPs), is both linear and robust over a wide range of animal speeds and detection thresholds and scores freezing in a quantitatively similar manner to trained human observers. By comparing the frequency distribution of motion during baseline periods and to the response to fox urine (which causes unconditioned fear), we suggest that freezing and non-freezing are distinct behaviors. Finally, we show how this algorithm can be applied to a fear conditioning paradigm yielding information on long and short-term associative memory as well as habituation. This automated analysis of fear conditioning will permit a more rapid and accurate assessment of the role of LTP in memory.",
keywords = "Automated, Behavior, Fear conditioning, Long-term potentiation, Memory, Motion",
author = "Kopec, {Charles D.} and Kessels, {H. W H G} and Bush, {D. E A} and Cain, {Christopher K.} and Joseph Ledoux and Roberto Malinow",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "228--233",
journal = "Neuropharmacology",
issn = "0028-3908",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A robust automated method to analyze rodent motion during fear conditioning

AU - Kopec, Charles D.

AU - Kessels, H. W H G

AU - Bush, D. E A

AU - Cain, Christopher K.

AU - Ledoux, Joseph

AU - Malinow, Roberto

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - A central question in the study of LTP has been to determine what role it plays in memory formation and storage. One valuable form of learning for addressing this issue is associative fear conditioning. In this paradigm an animal learns to associate a tone and shock, such that subsequent presentation of a tone evokes a fear response (freezing behavior). Recent studies indicate that overlapping cellular processes underlie fear conditioning and LTP. The fear response has generally been scored manually which is both labor-intensive and subject to potential artifacts such as inconsistent or biased results. Here we describe a simple automated method that provides unbiased and rapid analysis of animal motion. We show that measured motion, in units termed significant motion pixels (SMPs), is both linear and robust over a wide range of animal speeds and detection thresholds and scores freezing in a quantitatively similar manner to trained human observers. By comparing the frequency distribution of motion during baseline periods and to the response to fox urine (which causes unconditioned fear), we suggest that freezing and non-freezing are distinct behaviors. Finally, we show how this algorithm can be applied to a fear conditioning paradigm yielding information on long and short-term associative memory as well as habituation. This automated analysis of fear conditioning will permit a more rapid and accurate assessment of the role of LTP in memory.

AB - A central question in the study of LTP has been to determine what role it plays in memory formation and storage. One valuable form of learning for addressing this issue is associative fear conditioning. In this paradigm an animal learns to associate a tone and shock, such that subsequent presentation of a tone evokes a fear response (freezing behavior). Recent studies indicate that overlapping cellular processes underlie fear conditioning and LTP. The fear response has generally been scored manually which is both labor-intensive and subject to potential artifacts such as inconsistent or biased results. Here we describe a simple automated method that provides unbiased and rapid analysis of animal motion. We show that measured motion, in units termed significant motion pixels (SMPs), is both linear and robust over a wide range of animal speeds and detection thresholds and scores freezing in a quantitatively similar manner to trained human observers. By comparing the frequency distribution of motion during baseline periods and to the response to fox urine (which causes unconditioned fear), we suggest that freezing and non-freezing are distinct behaviors. Finally, we show how this algorithm can be applied to a fear conditioning paradigm yielding information on long and short-term associative memory as well as habituation. This automated analysis of fear conditioning will permit a more rapid and accurate assessment of the role of LTP in memory.

KW - Automated

KW - Behavior

KW - Fear conditioning

KW - Long-term potentiation

KW - Memory

KW - Motion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845870902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845870902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.028

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.028

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 228

EP - 233

JO - Neuropharmacology

JF - Neuropharmacology

SN - 0028-3908

IS - 1

ER -