A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications

Claire Christian, David Ainley, Megan Bailey, Paul Dayton, John Hocevar, Michael LeVine, Jordan Nikoloyuk, Claire Nouvian, Enriqueta Velarde, Rodolfo Werner, Jennifer Jacquet

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) was created as a conservation tool - intended to provide the best environmental choice in seafood to consumers and to create positive incentives that would improve the status and management of fisheries. During its 15. years, the MSC, which has an annual budget of close to US$20 million, has attached its logo to more than 170 fisheries. These certifications have not occurred without protest. Despite high costs and difficult procedures, conservation organizations and other groups have filed and paid for 19 formal objections to MSC fisheries certifications. Only one objection has been upheld such that the fishery was not certified. Here, we collate and summarize these objections and the major concerns as they relate to the MSC's three main principles: sustainability of the target fish stock, low impacts on the ecosystem, and effective, responsive management. An analysis of the formal objections indicates that the MSC's principles for sustainable fishing are too lenient and discretionary, and allow for overly generous interpretation by third-party certifiers and adjudicators, which means that the MSC label may be misleading both consumers and conservation funders.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)10-17
    Number of pages8
    JournalBiological Conservation
    Volume161
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2013

    Fingerprint

    certification
    fishery
    fisheries
    seafoods
    fisheries management
    seafood
    incentive
    fishing
    ecosystems
    fish
    objection
    ecosystem
    cost

    Keywords

    • Certification
    • Eco-label
    • Fisheries management
    • Marine Stewardship Council
    • Sustainable seafood

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Nature and Landscape Conservation

    Cite this

    Christian, C., Ainley, D., Bailey, M., Dayton, P., Hocevar, J., LeVine, M., ... Jacquet, J. (2013). A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications. Biological Conservation, 161, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.002

    A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications. / Christian, Claire; Ainley, David; Bailey, Megan; Dayton, Paul; Hocevar, John; LeVine, Michael; Nikoloyuk, Jordan; Nouvian, Claire; Velarde, Enriqueta; Werner, Rodolfo; Jacquet, Jennifer.

    In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 161, 05.2013, p. 10-17.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Christian, C, Ainley, D, Bailey, M, Dayton, P, Hocevar, J, LeVine, M, Nikoloyuk, J, Nouvian, C, Velarde, E, Werner, R & Jacquet, J 2013, 'A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications', Biological Conservation, vol. 161, pp. 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.002
    Christian, Claire ; Ainley, David ; Bailey, Megan ; Dayton, Paul ; Hocevar, John ; LeVine, Michael ; Nikoloyuk, Jordan ; Nouvian, Claire ; Velarde, Enriqueta ; Werner, Rodolfo ; Jacquet, Jennifer. / A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications. In: Biological Conservation. 2013 ; Vol. 161. pp. 10-17.
    @article{6e75f438bb5f435f9879c3d7ce494ac5,
    title = "A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications",
    abstract = "The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) was created as a conservation tool - intended to provide the best environmental choice in seafood to consumers and to create positive incentives that would improve the status and management of fisheries. During its 15. years, the MSC, which has an annual budget of close to US$20 million, has attached its logo to more than 170 fisheries. These certifications have not occurred without protest. Despite high costs and difficult procedures, conservation organizations and other groups have filed and paid for 19 formal objections to MSC fisheries certifications. Only one objection has been upheld such that the fishery was not certified. Here, we collate and summarize these objections and the major concerns as they relate to the MSC's three main principles: sustainability of the target fish stock, low impacts on the ecosystem, and effective, responsive management. An analysis of the formal objections indicates that the MSC's principles for sustainable fishing are too lenient and discretionary, and allow for overly generous interpretation by third-party certifiers and adjudicators, which means that the MSC label may be misleading both consumers and conservation funders.",
    keywords = "Certification, Eco-label, Fisheries management, Marine Stewardship Council, Sustainable seafood",
    author = "Claire Christian and David Ainley and Megan Bailey and Paul Dayton and John Hocevar and Michael LeVine and Jordan Nikoloyuk and Claire Nouvian and Enriqueta Velarde and Rodolfo Werner and Jennifer Jacquet",
    year = "2013",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "161",
    pages = "10--17",
    journal = "Biological Conservation",
    issn = "0006-3207",
    publisher = "Elsevier BV",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications

    AU - Christian, Claire

    AU - Ainley, David

    AU - Bailey, Megan

    AU - Dayton, Paul

    AU - Hocevar, John

    AU - LeVine, Michael

    AU - Nikoloyuk, Jordan

    AU - Nouvian, Claire

    AU - Velarde, Enriqueta

    AU - Werner, Rodolfo

    AU - Jacquet, Jennifer

    PY - 2013/5

    Y1 - 2013/5

    N2 - The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) was created as a conservation tool - intended to provide the best environmental choice in seafood to consumers and to create positive incentives that would improve the status and management of fisheries. During its 15. years, the MSC, which has an annual budget of close to US$20 million, has attached its logo to more than 170 fisheries. These certifications have not occurred without protest. Despite high costs and difficult procedures, conservation organizations and other groups have filed and paid for 19 formal objections to MSC fisheries certifications. Only one objection has been upheld such that the fishery was not certified. Here, we collate and summarize these objections and the major concerns as they relate to the MSC's three main principles: sustainability of the target fish stock, low impacts on the ecosystem, and effective, responsive management. An analysis of the formal objections indicates that the MSC's principles for sustainable fishing are too lenient and discretionary, and allow for overly generous interpretation by third-party certifiers and adjudicators, which means that the MSC label may be misleading both consumers and conservation funders.

    AB - The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) was created as a conservation tool - intended to provide the best environmental choice in seafood to consumers and to create positive incentives that would improve the status and management of fisheries. During its 15. years, the MSC, which has an annual budget of close to US$20 million, has attached its logo to more than 170 fisheries. These certifications have not occurred without protest. Despite high costs and difficult procedures, conservation organizations and other groups have filed and paid for 19 formal objections to MSC fisheries certifications. Only one objection has been upheld such that the fishery was not certified. Here, we collate and summarize these objections and the major concerns as they relate to the MSC's three main principles: sustainability of the target fish stock, low impacts on the ecosystem, and effective, responsive management. An analysis of the formal objections indicates that the MSC's principles for sustainable fishing are too lenient and discretionary, and allow for overly generous interpretation by third-party certifiers and adjudicators, which means that the MSC label may be misleading both consumers and conservation funders.

    KW - Certification

    KW - Eco-label

    KW - Fisheries management

    KW - Marine Stewardship Council

    KW - Sustainable seafood

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876342074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876342074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 161

    SP - 10

    EP - 17

    JO - Biological Conservation

    JF - Biological Conservation

    SN - 0006-3207

    ER -