A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning

James Uleman, Jeanine Reeves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interference on the Stroop test has been explained on the basis of a stronger habit (word reading) interfering with a weaker one (color naming) on an incongruous color-word (CW) card. Since scanning for words is slower (weaker) than scanning for colors, it was predicted that making the Stroop a scanning task would produce more interference with scanning for words rather than colors on the CW card. This prediction was confirmed. In addition, analyses of individual differences offered some support for differential habit-strength theories of Stroop interference. However, differences between the standard and scanning Stroop tests suggested that some kind of information-processing analysis would be more fruitful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-295
Number of pages3
JournalPerception & Psychophysics
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1971

Fingerprint

Stroop Test
interference
Color
habits
Habits
information processing
Automatic Data Processing
Individuality
Reading
Interference
Stroop

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning. / Uleman, James; Reeves, Jeanine.

In: Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 9, No. 3, 05.1971, p. 293-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uleman, James ; Reeves, Jeanine. / A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning. In: Perception & Psychophysics. 1971 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 293-295.
@article{56a1e7cf7b8841dd9d6b87e696362e75,
title = "A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning",
abstract = "Interference on the Stroop test has been explained on the basis of a stronger habit (word reading) interfering with a weaker one (color naming) on an incongruous color-word (CW) card. Since scanning for words is slower (weaker) than scanning for colors, it was predicted that making the Stroop a scanning task would produce more interference with scanning for words rather than colors on the CW card. This prediction was confirmed. In addition, analyses of individual differences offered some support for differential habit-strength theories of Stroop interference. However, differences between the standard and scanning Stroop tests suggested that some kind of information-processing analysis would be more fruitful.",
author = "James Uleman and Jeanine Reeves",
year = "1971",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3758/BF03212651",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "293--295",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning

AU - Uleman, James

AU - Reeves, Jeanine

PY - 1971/5

Y1 - 1971/5

N2 - Interference on the Stroop test has been explained on the basis of a stronger habit (word reading) interfering with a weaker one (color naming) on an incongruous color-word (CW) card. Since scanning for words is slower (weaker) than scanning for colors, it was predicted that making the Stroop a scanning task would produce more interference with scanning for words rather than colors on the CW card. This prediction was confirmed. In addition, analyses of individual differences offered some support for differential habit-strength theories of Stroop interference. However, differences between the standard and scanning Stroop tests suggested that some kind of information-processing analysis would be more fruitful.

AB - Interference on the Stroop test has been explained on the basis of a stronger habit (word reading) interfering with a weaker one (color naming) on an incongruous color-word (CW) card. Since scanning for words is slower (weaker) than scanning for colors, it was predicted that making the Stroop a scanning task would produce more interference with scanning for words rather than colors on the CW card. This prediction was confirmed. In addition, analyses of individual differences offered some support for differential habit-strength theories of Stroop interference. However, differences between the standard and scanning Stroop tests suggested that some kind of information-processing analysis would be more fruitful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041020920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041020920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03212651

DO - 10.3758/BF03212651

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041020920

VL - 9

SP - 293

EP - 295

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 3

ER -