A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory

Ronald van den Berg, Wei Ji Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Encoding precision in visual working memory decreases with the number of encoded items. Here, we propose a normative theory for such set size effects: the brain minimizes a weighted sum of an error-based behavioral cost and a neural encoding cost. We construct a model from this theory and find that it predicts set size effects. Notably, these effects are mediated by probing probability, which aligns with previous empirical findings. The model accounts well for effects of both set size and probing probability on encoding precision in nine delayed-estimation experiments. Moreover, we find support for the prediction that the total amount of invested resource can vary non-monotonically with set size. Finally, we show that it is sometimes optimal to encode only a subset or even none of the relevant items in a task. Our findings raise the possibility that cognitive "limitations" arise from rational cost minimization rather than from constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere34963
JournaleLife
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 7 2018

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Data storage equipment
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs
Brain
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)

Cite this

A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory. / van den Berg, Ronald; Ma, Wei Ji.

In: eLife, Vol. 7, e34963, 07.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d10d5a70a63489782a19580f894f38a,
title = "A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory",
abstract = "Encoding precision in visual working memory decreases with the number of encoded items. Here, we propose a normative theory for such set size effects: the brain minimizes a weighted sum of an error-based behavioral cost and a neural encoding cost. We construct a model from this theory and find that it predicts set size effects. Notably, these effects are mediated by probing probability, which aligns with previous empirical findings. The model accounts well for effects of both set size and probing probability on encoding precision in nine delayed-estimation experiments. Moreover, we find support for the prediction that the total amount of invested resource can vary non-monotonically with set size. Finally, we show that it is sometimes optimal to encode only a subset or even none of the relevant items in a task. Our findings raise the possibility that cognitive {"}limitations{"} arise from rational cost minimization rather than from constraints.",
author = "{van den Berg}, Ronald and Ma, {Wei Ji}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "7",
doi = "10.7554/eLife.34963",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "eLife",
issn = "2050-084X",
publisher = "eLife Sciences Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory

AU - van den Berg, Ronald

AU - Ma, Wei Ji

PY - 2018/8/7

Y1 - 2018/8/7

N2 - Encoding precision in visual working memory decreases with the number of encoded items. Here, we propose a normative theory for such set size effects: the brain minimizes a weighted sum of an error-based behavioral cost and a neural encoding cost. We construct a model from this theory and find that it predicts set size effects. Notably, these effects are mediated by probing probability, which aligns with previous empirical findings. The model accounts well for effects of both set size and probing probability on encoding precision in nine delayed-estimation experiments. Moreover, we find support for the prediction that the total amount of invested resource can vary non-monotonically with set size. Finally, we show that it is sometimes optimal to encode only a subset or even none of the relevant items in a task. Our findings raise the possibility that cognitive "limitations" arise from rational cost minimization rather than from constraints.

AB - Encoding precision in visual working memory decreases with the number of encoded items. Here, we propose a normative theory for such set size effects: the brain minimizes a weighted sum of an error-based behavioral cost and a neural encoding cost. We construct a model from this theory and find that it predicts set size effects. Notably, these effects are mediated by probing probability, which aligns with previous empirical findings. The model accounts well for effects of both set size and probing probability on encoding precision in nine delayed-estimation experiments. Moreover, we find support for the prediction that the total amount of invested resource can vary non-monotonically with set size. Finally, we show that it is sometimes optimal to encode only a subset or even none of the relevant items in a task. Our findings raise the possibility that cognitive "limitations" arise from rational cost minimization rather than from constraints.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053938153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053938153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7554/eLife.34963

DO - 10.7554/eLife.34963

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - eLife

JF - eLife

SN - 2050-084X

M1 - e34963

ER -