A reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships of Oreopithecus bambolii gervais

Terry Harrison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In recent years there have been renewed attempts to elucidate the phylogenetic affinities and taxonomic status of Oreopithecus bambolii from the late Miocene of Europe. The majority of previous workers who have studied the material have concluded that it represents a hominoid primate, albeit a rather specialized one. Several recent workers have revived the earlier suggestion that Oreopithecus may be a cercopithecoid primate, based mainly on presumed synapomorphies of the dentition. Although there are some general structural similarities between the cheek teeth of Oreopithecus and those of Old World monkeys, comparisons indicate that this resemblance is likely to be due to functional convergence, related to dietary similarities, rather than due to a close phyletic relationship. The cranio-dental features of Oreopithecus appear to be a combination of primitive catarrhine characters and autapomorphies. Much more informative evidence for determining the phyletic affinities of Oreopithecus is provided by the postcranial skeleton. Oreopithecus shares with the living hominoids a unique range of derived catarrhine features of the postcranium that are so detailed that there seems little possibility that they could have been developed independently in the two taxa. The present evidence best supports the conclusion that Oreopithecus has its closest affinities with the living hominoids. However, the relationships of Oreopithecus to taxa within the Hominoidea have proved difficult to ascertain, owing to a lack of synapomorphies with living representatives of the superfamily. In view of the uniquely derived facial characteristics of Oreopithecus bambolii, the species clearly warrants inclusion in a distinct hominoid family, the Oreopithecidae.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)541-583
    Number of pages43
    JournalJournal of Human Evolution
    Volume15
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1986

    Fingerprint

    Hominidae
    primate
    phylogenetics
    worker
    teeth
    dentition
    phylogeny
    skeleton
    tooth
    evidence
    Primates
    inclusion
    Miocene
    Cercopithecidae
    lack
    present
    Phylogenetics
    Affinity
    Workers
    Taxon

    Keywords

    • Oreopithecus bambolii, Miocene, Hominoidca, Phylogenetic relationships

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Education
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    A reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships of Oreopithecus bambolii gervais. / Harrison, Terry.

    In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 15, No. 7, 1986, p. 541-583.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{c8abb0745338453fbe81ced7d03a15f8,
    title = "A reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships of Oreopithecus bambolii gervais",
    abstract = "In recent years there have been renewed attempts to elucidate the phylogenetic affinities and taxonomic status of Oreopithecus bambolii from the late Miocene of Europe. The majority of previous workers who have studied the material have concluded that it represents a hominoid primate, albeit a rather specialized one. Several recent workers have revived the earlier suggestion that Oreopithecus may be a cercopithecoid primate, based mainly on presumed synapomorphies of the dentition. Although there are some general structural similarities between the cheek teeth of Oreopithecus and those of Old World monkeys, comparisons indicate that this resemblance is likely to be due to functional convergence, related to dietary similarities, rather than due to a close phyletic relationship. The cranio-dental features of Oreopithecus appear to be a combination of primitive catarrhine characters and autapomorphies. Much more informative evidence for determining the phyletic affinities of Oreopithecus is provided by the postcranial skeleton. Oreopithecus shares with the living hominoids a unique range of derived catarrhine features of the postcranium that are so detailed that there seems little possibility that they could have been developed independently in the two taxa. The present evidence best supports the conclusion that Oreopithecus has its closest affinities with the living hominoids. However, the relationships of Oreopithecus to taxa within the Hominoidea have proved difficult to ascertain, owing to a lack of synapomorphies with living representatives of the superfamily. In view of the uniquely derived facial characteristics of Oreopithecus bambolii, the species clearly warrants inclusion in a distinct hominoid family, the Oreopithecidae.",
    keywords = "Oreopithecus bambolii, Miocene, Hominoidca, Phylogenetic relationships",
    author = "Terry Harrison",
    year = "1986",
    doi = "10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80073-2",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "541--583",
    journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
    issn = "0047-2484",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships of Oreopithecus bambolii gervais

    AU - Harrison, Terry

    PY - 1986

    Y1 - 1986

    N2 - In recent years there have been renewed attempts to elucidate the phylogenetic affinities and taxonomic status of Oreopithecus bambolii from the late Miocene of Europe. The majority of previous workers who have studied the material have concluded that it represents a hominoid primate, albeit a rather specialized one. Several recent workers have revived the earlier suggestion that Oreopithecus may be a cercopithecoid primate, based mainly on presumed synapomorphies of the dentition. Although there are some general structural similarities between the cheek teeth of Oreopithecus and those of Old World monkeys, comparisons indicate that this resemblance is likely to be due to functional convergence, related to dietary similarities, rather than due to a close phyletic relationship. The cranio-dental features of Oreopithecus appear to be a combination of primitive catarrhine characters and autapomorphies. Much more informative evidence for determining the phyletic affinities of Oreopithecus is provided by the postcranial skeleton. Oreopithecus shares with the living hominoids a unique range of derived catarrhine features of the postcranium that are so detailed that there seems little possibility that they could have been developed independently in the two taxa. The present evidence best supports the conclusion that Oreopithecus has its closest affinities with the living hominoids. However, the relationships of Oreopithecus to taxa within the Hominoidea have proved difficult to ascertain, owing to a lack of synapomorphies with living representatives of the superfamily. In view of the uniquely derived facial characteristics of Oreopithecus bambolii, the species clearly warrants inclusion in a distinct hominoid family, the Oreopithecidae.

    AB - In recent years there have been renewed attempts to elucidate the phylogenetic affinities and taxonomic status of Oreopithecus bambolii from the late Miocene of Europe. The majority of previous workers who have studied the material have concluded that it represents a hominoid primate, albeit a rather specialized one. Several recent workers have revived the earlier suggestion that Oreopithecus may be a cercopithecoid primate, based mainly on presumed synapomorphies of the dentition. Although there are some general structural similarities between the cheek teeth of Oreopithecus and those of Old World monkeys, comparisons indicate that this resemblance is likely to be due to functional convergence, related to dietary similarities, rather than due to a close phyletic relationship. The cranio-dental features of Oreopithecus appear to be a combination of primitive catarrhine characters and autapomorphies. Much more informative evidence for determining the phyletic affinities of Oreopithecus is provided by the postcranial skeleton. Oreopithecus shares with the living hominoids a unique range of derived catarrhine features of the postcranium that are so detailed that there seems little possibility that they could have been developed independently in the two taxa. The present evidence best supports the conclusion that Oreopithecus has its closest affinities with the living hominoids. However, the relationships of Oreopithecus to taxa within the Hominoidea have proved difficult to ascertain, owing to a lack of synapomorphies with living representatives of the superfamily. In view of the uniquely derived facial characteristics of Oreopithecus bambolii, the species clearly warrants inclusion in a distinct hominoid family, the Oreopithecidae.

    KW - Oreopithecus bambolii, Miocene, Hominoidca, Phylogenetic relationships

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001352063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001352063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80073-2

    DO - 10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80073-2

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 541

    EP - 583

    JO - Journal of Human Evolution

    JF - Journal of Human Evolution

    SN - 0047-2484

    IS - 7

    ER -