A psychometric evaluation of the arm motor-ability test

Michael W. O'Dell, Grace Kim, Lisa Rivera, Robert Fieo, Paul Christos, Caitlin Polistena, Kerri Fitzgerald, Delia Gorga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To further examine the psychometric properties of a 9-item version of the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT-9) in persons with stroke. Subjects: Thirty-two community-dwelling persons > 6 months post-stroke undergoing robotics treatment (mean age = 56.0 years, time post-stroke = 4.1 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 4.1, and AMAT-9 score = 1.22). Methods: Construct validity (including Rasch analyses) used baseline data prior to treatment (n = 32). Standardized response mean was calculated for subjects completing the protocol (n = 29). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were also administered. Results: Spearman-rank correlation coefficients between AMAT-9 and the WMFT, FMA, and ARAT were strong (0.78-0.79, all p < 0.001). The correlation between the AMAT-9 and SIS Hand Function sub-score was stronger than that between the AMAT-9 and the Communication subscore (0.40, p = 0.025 and -0.16, p = 0.39, respectively). Rasch analyses provided evidence for an appropriate hierarchical structure of item difficulties, unidimensionality, and good reliability. The AMAT demonstrated a comparable standardized response mean of 0.98. Conclusions: The AMAT-9 is valid and responsive among subjects scoring in the lower range of the scale. It has the advantage of assessing function and by eliminating the standing item from the previous iteration, it may be more easily used with severely impaired patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-527
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Psychometrics
Arm
Stroke
Health Services Research
Independent Living
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Robotics
Nonparametric Statistics
Hand
Communication
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Arm motor ability test
  • Quality of life
  • Rasch analysis
  • Responsiveness
  • Stroke
  • Validity
  • stroke rehabilitation
  • rehabilitation sciences
  • hand function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

O'Dell, M. W., Kim, G., Rivera, L., Fieo, R., Christos, P., Polistena, C., ... Gorga, D. (2013). A psychometric evaluation of the arm motor-ability test. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(6), 519-527. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1138

A psychometric evaluation of the arm motor-ability test. / O'Dell, Michael W.; Kim, Grace; Rivera, Lisa; Fieo, Robert; Christos, Paul; Polistena, Caitlin; Fitzgerald, Kerri; Gorga, Delia.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2013, p. 519-527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Dell, MW, Kim, G, Rivera, L, Fieo, R, Christos, P, Polistena, C, Fitzgerald, K & Gorga, D 2013, 'A psychometric evaluation of the arm motor-ability test', Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 519-527. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1138
O'Dell, Michael W. ; Kim, Grace ; Rivera, Lisa ; Fieo, Robert ; Christos, Paul ; Polistena, Caitlin ; Fitzgerald, Kerri ; Gorga, Delia. / A psychometric evaluation of the arm motor-ability test. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 45, No. 6. pp. 519-527.
@article{f073ad0df52f4f1a806ef9309bee62e4,
title = "A psychometric evaluation of the arm motor-ability test",
abstract = "Objective: To further examine the psychometric properties of a 9-item version of the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT-9) in persons with stroke. Subjects: Thirty-two community-dwelling persons > 6 months post-stroke undergoing robotics treatment (mean age = 56.0 years, time post-stroke = 4.1 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 4.1, and AMAT-9 score = 1.22). Methods: Construct validity (including Rasch analyses) used baseline data prior to treatment (n = 32). Standardized response mean was calculated for subjects completing the protocol (n = 29). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were also administered. Results: Spearman-rank correlation coefficients between AMAT-9 and the WMFT, FMA, and ARAT were strong (0.78-0.79, all p < 0.001). The correlation between the AMAT-9 and SIS Hand Function sub-score was stronger than that between the AMAT-9 and the Communication subscore (0.40, p = 0.025 and -0.16, p = 0.39, respectively). Rasch analyses provided evidence for an appropriate hierarchical structure of item difficulties, unidimensionality, and good reliability. The AMAT demonstrated a comparable standardized response mean of 0.98. Conclusions: The AMAT-9 is valid and responsive among subjects scoring in the lower range of the scale. It has the advantage of assessing function and by eliminating the standing item from the previous iteration, it may be more easily used with severely impaired patients.",
keywords = "Arm motor ability test, Quality of life, Rasch analysis, Responsiveness, Stroke, Validity, stroke rehabilitation, rehabilitation sciences, hand function",
author = "O'Dell, {Michael W.} and Grace Kim and Lisa Rivera and Robert Fieo and Paul Christos and Caitlin Polistena and Kerri Fitzgerald and Delia Gorga",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.2340/16501977-1138",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "519--527",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine",
issn = "1650-1977",
publisher = "Foundation for Rehabilitation Information",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A psychometric evaluation of the arm motor-ability test

AU - O'Dell, Michael W.

AU - Kim, Grace

AU - Rivera, Lisa

AU - Fieo, Robert

AU - Christos, Paul

AU - Polistena, Caitlin

AU - Fitzgerald, Kerri

AU - Gorga, Delia

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objective: To further examine the psychometric properties of a 9-item version of the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT-9) in persons with stroke. Subjects: Thirty-two community-dwelling persons > 6 months post-stroke undergoing robotics treatment (mean age = 56.0 years, time post-stroke = 4.1 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 4.1, and AMAT-9 score = 1.22). Methods: Construct validity (including Rasch analyses) used baseline data prior to treatment (n = 32). Standardized response mean was calculated for subjects completing the protocol (n = 29). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were also administered. Results: Spearman-rank correlation coefficients between AMAT-9 and the WMFT, FMA, and ARAT were strong (0.78-0.79, all p < 0.001). The correlation between the AMAT-9 and SIS Hand Function sub-score was stronger than that between the AMAT-9 and the Communication subscore (0.40, p = 0.025 and -0.16, p = 0.39, respectively). Rasch analyses provided evidence for an appropriate hierarchical structure of item difficulties, unidimensionality, and good reliability. The AMAT demonstrated a comparable standardized response mean of 0.98. Conclusions: The AMAT-9 is valid and responsive among subjects scoring in the lower range of the scale. It has the advantage of assessing function and by eliminating the standing item from the previous iteration, it may be more easily used with severely impaired patients.

AB - Objective: To further examine the psychometric properties of a 9-item version of the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT-9) in persons with stroke. Subjects: Thirty-two community-dwelling persons > 6 months post-stroke undergoing robotics treatment (mean age = 56.0 years, time post-stroke = 4.1 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 4.1, and AMAT-9 score = 1.22). Methods: Construct validity (including Rasch analyses) used baseline data prior to treatment (n = 32). Standardized response mean was calculated for subjects completing the protocol (n = 29). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were also administered. Results: Spearman-rank correlation coefficients between AMAT-9 and the WMFT, FMA, and ARAT were strong (0.78-0.79, all p < 0.001). The correlation between the AMAT-9 and SIS Hand Function sub-score was stronger than that between the AMAT-9 and the Communication subscore (0.40, p = 0.025 and -0.16, p = 0.39, respectively). Rasch analyses provided evidence for an appropriate hierarchical structure of item difficulties, unidimensionality, and good reliability. The AMAT demonstrated a comparable standardized response mean of 0.98. Conclusions: The AMAT-9 is valid and responsive among subjects scoring in the lower range of the scale. It has the advantage of assessing function and by eliminating the standing item from the previous iteration, it may be more easily used with severely impaired patients.

KW - Arm motor ability test

KW - Quality of life

KW - Rasch analysis

KW - Responsiveness

KW - Stroke

KW - Validity

KW - stroke rehabilitation

KW - rehabilitation sciences

KW - hand function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878803083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878803083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2340/16501977-1138

DO - 10.2340/16501977-1138

M3 - Article

C2 - 23532275

AN - SCOPUS:84878803083

VL - 45

SP - 519

EP - 527

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

SN - 1650-1977

IS - 6

ER -