A news media analysis of the economic and reputational penalties of the hospital readmissions reduction program

Melissa S. Winborn, Joyce Alencherril, Jose Pagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Section 3025 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 established the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), an initiative designed to penalize hospitals with excess 30-day readmissions. This study investigates whether readmission penalties under HRRP impose significant reputational effects on hospitals. Data extracted from 2012 to 2013 news stories suggest that the higher the actual penalty, the higher the perceived cost of the penalty, the more likely it is that hospitals will state they have no control over the low-income patients they serve or that they will describe themselves as safety net providers. The downside of being singled out as a low-quality hospital deserving a relatively high penalty seems to be larger than the upside of being singled out as a high-quality hospital facing a relatively low penalty. Although the financial burden of the penalties seems to be low, hospitals may be reacting to the fact that information about excess readmissions and readmission penalties is being released widely and is scrutinized by the news media and the general public.

Fingerprint

Patient Readmission
Economics
Safety-net Providers
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
State Hospitals
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • hospital readmissions
  • Medicare
  • news media
  • penalty
  • quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{5999f91d1aef468d8c9d9716087e7b28,
title = "A news media analysis of the economic and reputational penalties of the hospital readmissions reduction program",
abstract = "Section 3025 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 established the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), an initiative designed to penalize hospitals with excess 30-day readmissions. This study investigates whether readmission penalties under HRRP impose significant reputational effects on hospitals. Data extracted from 2012 to 2013 news stories suggest that the higher the actual penalty, the higher the perceived cost of the penalty, the more likely it is that hospitals will state they have no control over the low-income patients they serve or that they will describe themselves as safety net providers. The downside of being singled out as a low-quality hospital deserving a relatively high penalty seems to be larger than the upside of being singled out as a high-quality hospital facing a relatively low penalty. Although the financial burden of the penalties seems to be low, hospitals may be reacting to the fact that information about excess readmissions and readmission penalties is being released widely and is scrutinized by the news media and the general public.",
keywords = "hospital readmissions, Medicare, news media, penalty, quality",
author = "Winborn, {Melissa S.} and Joyce Alencherril and Jose Pagan",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0046958014561635",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
journal = "Inquiry",
issn = "0046-9580",
publisher = "Excellus Health Plan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A news media analysis of the economic and reputational penalties of the hospital readmissions reduction program

AU - Winborn, Melissa S.

AU - Alencherril, Joyce

AU - Pagan, Jose

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Section 3025 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 established the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), an initiative designed to penalize hospitals with excess 30-day readmissions. This study investigates whether readmission penalties under HRRP impose significant reputational effects on hospitals. Data extracted from 2012 to 2013 news stories suggest that the higher the actual penalty, the higher the perceived cost of the penalty, the more likely it is that hospitals will state they have no control over the low-income patients they serve or that they will describe themselves as safety net providers. The downside of being singled out as a low-quality hospital deserving a relatively high penalty seems to be larger than the upside of being singled out as a high-quality hospital facing a relatively low penalty. Although the financial burden of the penalties seems to be low, hospitals may be reacting to the fact that information about excess readmissions and readmission penalties is being released widely and is scrutinized by the news media and the general public.

AB - Section 3025 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 established the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), an initiative designed to penalize hospitals with excess 30-day readmissions. This study investigates whether readmission penalties under HRRP impose significant reputational effects on hospitals. Data extracted from 2012 to 2013 news stories suggest that the higher the actual penalty, the higher the perceived cost of the penalty, the more likely it is that hospitals will state they have no control over the low-income patients they serve or that they will describe themselves as safety net providers. The downside of being singled out as a low-quality hospital deserving a relatively high penalty seems to be larger than the upside of being singled out as a high-quality hospital facing a relatively low penalty. Although the financial burden of the penalties seems to be low, hospitals may be reacting to the fact that information about excess readmissions and readmission penalties is being released widely and is scrutinized by the news media and the general public.

KW - hospital readmissions

KW - Medicare

KW - news media

KW - penalty

KW - quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930887386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930887386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0046958014561635

DO - 10.1177/0046958014561635

M3 - Article

C2 - 25500753

AN - SCOPUS:84923696453

VL - 51

JO - Inquiry

JF - Inquiry

SN - 0046-9580

ER -