A natural experiment of race-based and issue voting: The 2001 city of Los Angeles elections

Marisa A. Abrajano, Jonathan Nagler, R. Michael Alvarez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The theory of racially polarized voting suggests that race is a primary determinant of vote choice in elections where a minority candidate is pitted against a white candidate. The spatial model of voting suggests that voters consider the issue positions of candidates and choose the candidate closest to their own positions. The unique context of the 2001 Los Angeles city election allows us to test these two theories. In each of two races in this election, a Latino candidate competed against a white candidate. In one race the white candidate was considered more liberal, while in the other race the Latino candidate was seen as more liberal. This particular ethnic and ideological composition provides us with a natural experimenting which to test the two competing theories. While voter ethnicity mattered, we show that consistent with the spatial model, voters also relied on issues and ideology as factors in their voting choices. By considering the choices voters are making in two different elections, we argue that estimates of the extent of racial voting in previous research may be overstated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-218
Number of pages16
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume58
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

voting
candidacy
election
experiment
voter
ideology
ethnicity
minority
determinants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A natural experiment of race-based and issue voting : The 2001 city of Los Angeles elections. / Abrajano, Marisa A.; Nagler, Jonathan; Alvarez, R. Michael.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 2, 06.2005, p. 203-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{545c564b87384a77937a4e1cb9468c0c,
title = "A natural experiment of race-based and issue voting: The 2001 city of Los Angeles elections",
abstract = "The theory of racially polarized voting suggests that race is a primary determinant of vote choice in elections where a minority candidate is pitted against a white candidate. The spatial model of voting suggests that voters consider the issue positions of candidates and choose the candidate closest to their own positions. The unique context of the 2001 Los Angeles city election allows us to test these two theories. In each of two races in this election, a Latino candidate competed against a white candidate. In one race the white candidate was considered more liberal, while in the other race the Latino candidate was seen as more liberal. This particular ethnic and ideological composition provides us with a natural experimenting which to test the two competing theories. While voter ethnicity mattered, we show that consistent with the spatial model, voters also relied on issues and ideology as factors in their voting choices. By considering the choices voters are making in two different elections, we argue that estimates of the extent of racial voting in previous research may be overstated.",
author = "Abrajano, {Marisa A.} and Jonathan Nagler and Alvarez, {R. Michael}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "203--218",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A natural experiment of race-based and issue voting

T2 - The 2001 city of Los Angeles elections

AU - Abrajano, Marisa A.

AU - Nagler, Jonathan

AU - Alvarez, R. Michael

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - The theory of racially polarized voting suggests that race is a primary determinant of vote choice in elections where a minority candidate is pitted against a white candidate. The spatial model of voting suggests that voters consider the issue positions of candidates and choose the candidate closest to their own positions. The unique context of the 2001 Los Angeles city election allows us to test these two theories. In each of two races in this election, a Latino candidate competed against a white candidate. In one race the white candidate was considered more liberal, while in the other race the Latino candidate was seen as more liberal. This particular ethnic and ideological composition provides us with a natural experimenting which to test the two competing theories. While voter ethnicity mattered, we show that consistent with the spatial model, voters also relied on issues and ideology as factors in their voting choices. By considering the choices voters are making in two different elections, we argue that estimates of the extent of racial voting in previous research may be overstated.

AB - The theory of racially polarized voting suggests that race is a primary determinant of vote choice in elections where a minority candidate is pitted against a white candidate. The spatial model of voting suggests that voters consider the issue positions of candidates and choose the candidate closest to their own positions. The unique context of the 2001 Los Angeles city election allows us to test these two theories. In each of two races in this election, a Latino candidate competed against a white candidate. In one race the white candidate was considered more liberal, while in the other race the Latino candidate was seen as more liberal. This particular ethnic and ideological composition provides us with a natural experimenting which to test the two competing theories. While voter ethnicity mattered, we show that consistent with the spatial model, voters also relied on issues and ideology as factors in their voting choices. By considering the choices voters are making in two different elections, we argue that estimates of the extent of racial voting in previous research may be overstated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23244450447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23244450447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23244450447

VL - 58

SP - 203

EP - 218

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 2

ER -