A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition

Brian Macwhinney, Nick Chater, Roland Hausser, Erika Hoff, Simon Kirby, Ping Li, Gary F. Marcus, Letitia R. Naigles, Partha Niyogi, William O'Grady, Steven Pinker, Douglas L T Rohde, Barbara C. Scholz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many researchers believe that there is a logical problem at the centre of language acquisition theory. According to this analysis, the input to the learner is too inconsistent and incomplete to determine the acquisition of grammar. Moreover, when corrective feedback is provided, children tend to ignore it. As a result, language learning must rely on additional constraints from universal grammar. To solve this logical problem, theorists have proposed a series of constraints and parameterizations on the form of universal grammar. Plausible alternatives to these constraints include : conservatism, item-based learning, indirect negative evidence, competition, cue construction, and monitoring. Careful analysis of child language corpora has cast doubt on claims regarding the absence of positive exemplars. Using demonstrably available positive data, simple learning procedures can be formulated for each of the syntactic structures that have traditionally motivated invocation of the logical problem. Within the perspective of emergentist theory (MacWhinney, 2001), the operation of a set of mutually supportive processes is viewed as providing multiple buffering for developmental outcomes. However, the fact that some syntactic structures are more difficult to learn than others can be used to highlight areas of intense grammatical competition and processing load.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)883-968
Number of pages86
JournalJournal of Child Language
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Fingerprint

language acquisition
grammar
Language
Learning
learning
Child Language
conservatism
Politics
language
Cues
Research Personnel
monitoring
evidence
Logical Problem
Language Acquisition
Syntactic Structure
Universal Grammar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Macwhinney, B., Chater, N., Hausser, R., Hoff, E., Kirby, S., Li, P., ... Scholz, B. C. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883-968. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006336

A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. / Macwhinney, Brian; Chater, Nick; Hausser, Roland; Hoff, Erika; Kirby, Simon; Li, Ping; Marcus, Gary F.; Naigles, Letitia R.; Niyogi, Partha; O'Grady, William; Pinker, Steven; Rohde, Douglas L T; Scholz, Barbara C.

In: Journal of Child Language, Vol. 31, No. 4, 11.2004, p. 883-968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Macwhinney, B, Chater, N, Hausser, R, Hoff, E, Kirby, S, Li, P, Marcus, GF, Naigles, LR, Niyogi, P, O'Grady, W, Pinker, S, Rohde, DLT & Scholz, BC 2004, 'A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition', Journal of Child Language, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 883-968. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006336
Macwhinney, Brian ; Chater, Nick ; Hausser, Roland ; Hoff, Erika ; Kirby, Simon ; Li, Ping ; Marcus, Gary F. ; Naigles, Letitia R. ; Niyogi, Partha ; O'Grady, William ; Pinker, Steven ; Rohde, Douglas L T ; Scholz, Barbara C. / A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. In: Journal of Child Language. 2004 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 883-968.
@article{d17b6d2ae3e8456d9b55117114e87f38,
title = "A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition",
abstract = "Many researchers believe that there is a logical problem at the centre of language acquisition theory. According to this analysis, the input to the learner is too inconsistent and incomplete to determine the acquisition of grammar. Moreover, when corrective feedback is provided, children tend to ignore it. As a result, language learning must rely on additional constraints from universal grammar. To solve this logical problem, theorists have proposed a series of constraints and parameterizations on the form of universal grammar. Plausible alternatives to these constraints include : conservatism, item-based learning, indirect negative evidence, competition, cue construction, and monitoring. Careful analysis of child language corpora has cast doubt on claims regarding the absence of positive exemplars. Using demonstrably available positive data, simple learning procedures can be formulated for each of the syntactic structures that have traditionally motivated invocation of the logical problem. Within the perspective of emergentist theory (MacWhinney, 2001), the operation of a set of mutually supportive processes is viewed as providing multiple buffering for developmental outcomes. However, the fact that some syntactic structures are more difficult to learn than others can be used to highlight areas of intense grammatical competition and processing load.",
author = "Brian Macwhinney and Nick Chater and Roland Hausser and Erika Hoff and Simon Kirby and Ping Li and Marcus, {Gary F.} and Naigles, {Letitia R.} and Partha Niyogi and William O'Grady and Steven Pinker and Rohde, {Douglas L T} and Scholz, {Barbara C.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1017/S0305000904006336",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "883--968",
journal = "Journal of Child Language",
issn = "0305-0009",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition

AU - Macwhinney, Brian

AU - Chater, Nick

AU - Hausser, Roland

AU - Hoff, Erika

AU - Kirby, Simon

AU - Li, Ping

AU - Marcus, Gary F.

AU - Naigles, Letitia R.

AU - Niyogi, Partha

AU - O'Grady, William

AU - Pinker, Steven

AU - Rohde, Douglas L T

AU - Scholz, Barbara C.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Many researchers believe that there is a logical problem at the centre of language acquisition theory. According to this analysis, the input to the learner is too inconsistent and incomplete to determine the acquisition of grammar. Moreover, when corrective feedback is provided, children tend to ignore it. As a result, language learning must rely on additional constraints from universal grammar. To solve this logical problem, theorists have proposed a series of constraints and parameterizations on the form of universal grammar. Plausible alternatives to these constraints include : conservatism, item-based learning, indirect negative evidence, competition, cue construction, and monitoring. Careful analysis of child language corpora has cast doubt on claims regarding the absence of positive exemplars. Using demonstrably available positive data, simple learning procedures can be formulated for each of the syntactic structures that have traditionally motivated invocation of the logical problem. Within the perspective of emergentist theory (MacWhinney, 2001), the operation of a set of mutually supportive processes is viewed as providing multiple buffering for developmental outcomes. However, the fact that some syntactic structures are more difficult to learn than others can be used to highlight areas of intense grammatical competition and processing load.

AB - Many researchers believe that there is a logical problem at the centre of language acquisition theory. According to this analysis, the input to the learner is too inconsistent and incomplete to determine the acquisition of grammar. Moreover, when corrective feedback is provided, children tend to ignore it. As a result, language learning must rely on additional constraints from universal grammar. To solve this logical problem, theorists have proposed a series of constraints and parameterizations on the form of universal grammar. Plausible alternatives to these constraints include : conservatism, item-based learning, indirect negative evidence, competition, cue construction, and monitoring. Careful analysis of child language corpora has cast doubt on claims regarding the absence of positive exemplars. Using demonstrably available positive data, simple learning procedures can be formulated for each of the syntactic structures that have traditionally motivated invocation of the logical problem. Within the perspective of emergentist theory (MacWhinney, 2001), the operation of a set of mutually supportive processes is viewed as providing multiple buffering for developmental outcomes. However, the fact that some syntactic structures are more difficult to learn than others can be used to highlight areas of intense grammatical competition and processing load.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19944364857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19944364857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0305000904006336

DO - 10.1017/S0305000904006336

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 883

EP - 968

JO - Journal of Child Language

JF - Journal of Child Language

SN - 0305-0009

IS - 4

ER -