A mere machine: The supreme court, congress, and American democracy

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

Introductory textbooks on American government tell us that the Supreme Court is independent from the elected branches and that independent courts better protect rights than their more deferential counterparts. But are these facts or myths? In this groundbreaking new work, Anna Harvey reports evidence showing that the Supreme Court is in fact extraordinarily deferential to congressional preferences in its constitutional rulings. Analyzing cross-national evidence, Harvey also finds that the rights protections we enjoy in the United States appear to be largely due to the fact that we do not have an independent Supreme Court. In fact, we would likely have even greater protections for political and economic rights were we to prohibit our federal courts from exercising judicial review altogether. Harvey's findings suggest that constitutional designers would be wise to heed Thomas Jefferson's advice to "let mercy be the character of the law-giver, but let the judge be a mere machine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherYale University Press
Number of pages366
ISBN (Print)9780300171112
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Supreme Court
democracy
evidence
textbook
myth
Law
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

A mere machine : The supreme court, congress, and American democracy. / Harvey, Anna.

Yale University Press, 2013. 366 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

@book{95d025cce43640c793da34f61cb8d8af,
title = "A mere machine: The supreme court, congress, and American democracy",
abstract = "Introductory textbooks on American government tell us that the Supreme Court is independent from the elected branches and that independent courts better protect rights than their more deferential counterparts. But are these facts or myths? In this groundbreaking new work, Anna Harvey reports evidence showing that the Supreme Court is in fact extraordinarily deferential to congressional preferences in its constitutional rulings. Analyzing cross-national evidence, Harvey also finds that the rights protections we enjoy in the United States appear to be largely due to the fact that we do not have an independent Supreme Court. In fact, we would likely have even greater protections for political and economic rights were we to prohibit our federal courts from exercising judicial review altogether. Harvey's findings suggest that constitutional designers would be wise to heed Thomas Jefferson's advice to {"}let mercy be the character of the law-giver, but let the judge be a mere machine.",
author = "Anna Harvey",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780300171112",
publisher = "Yale University Press",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - A mere machine

T2 - The supreme court, congress, and American democracy

AU - Harvey, Anna

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Introductory textbooks on American government tell us that the Supreme Court is independent from the elected branches and that independent courts better protect rights than their more deferential counterparts. But are these facts or myths? In this groundbreaking new work, Anna Harvey reports evidence showing that the Supreme Court is in fact extraordinarily deferential to congressional preferences in its constitutional rulings. Analyzing cross-national evidence, Harvey also finds that the rights protections we enjoy in the United States appear to be largely due to the fact that we do not have an independent Supreme Court. In fact, we would likely have even greater protections for political and economic rights were we to prohibit our federal courts from exercising judicial review altogether. Harvey's findings suggest that constitutional designers would be wise to heed Thomas Jefferson's advice to "let mercy be the character of the law-giver, but let the judge be a mere machine.

AB - Introductory textbooks on American government tell us that the Supreme Court is independent from the elected branches and that independent courts better protect rights than their more deferential counterparts. But are these facts or myths? In this groundbreaking new work, Anna Harvey reports evidence showing that the Supreme Court is in fact extraordinarily deferential to congressional preferences in its constitutional rulings. Analyzing cross-national evidence, Harvey also finds that the rights protections we enjoy in the United States appear to be largely due to the fact that we do not have an independent Supreme Court. In fact, we would likely have even greater protections for political and economic rights were we to prohibit our federal courts from exercising judicial review altogether. Harvey's findings suggest that constitutional designers would be wise to heed Thomas Jefferson's advice to "let mercy be the character of the law-giver, but let the judge be a mere machine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903114863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903114863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Book

AN - SCOPUS:84903114863

SN - 9780300171112

BT - A mere machine

PB - Yale University Press

ER -