A linguistic inquiry and word count analysis of the adult attachment interview in two large corpora

Theo Waters, Katherine C. Haydon, Ryan D. Steele, Glenn I. Roisman, Cathryn Booth-LaForce

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

An emerging literature suggests that variation in Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985) states of mind about childhood experiences with primary caregivers is reflected in specific linguistic features captured by the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) automated text analysis program (Pennebaker, Booth, & Francis, 2007). The current report addressed limitations of prior studies in this literature by using 2 large AAI corpora (Ns = 826 and 857) and a broader range of linguistic variables, as well as examining associations of LIWC-derived AAI dimensions with key developmental antecedents. First, regression analyses revealed that dismissing states of mind were associated with transcripts that were more truncated and deemphasized discussion of the attachment relationship whereas preoccupied states of mind were associated with longer, more conflicted, and angry narratives. Second, in aggregate, LIWC variables accounted for over a third of the variation in AAI dismissing and preoccupied states of mind, with regression weights cross-validating across samples. Third, LIWCderived dismissing and preoccupied state of mind dimensions were associated with direct observations of maternal and paternal sensitivity as well as infant attachment security in childhood, replicating the pattern of results reported in Haydon, Roisman, Owen, Booth-LaForce, and Cox (2014) using coderderived dismissing and preoccupation scores in the same sample.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)78-88
Number of pages11
JournalCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Interviews
Caregivers
Regression Analysis
Mothers
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Adult Attachment Interview
  • Attachment
  • Linguistic structure
  • LIWC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

A linguistic inquiry and word count analysis of the adult attachment interview in two large corpora. / Waters, Theo; Haydon, Katherine C.; Steele, Ryan D.; Roisman, Glenn I.; Booth-LaForce, Cathryn.

In: Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 78-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Waters, Theo ; Haydon, Katherine C. ; Steele, Ryan D. ; Roisman, Glenn I. ; Booth-LaForce, Cathryn. / A linguistic inquiry and word count analysis of the adult attachment interview in two large corpora. In: Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 2016 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 78-88.
@article{3ee31d5efa08452bacf28e2178bbe4c4,
title = "A linguistic inquiry and word count analysis of the adult attachment interview in two large corpora",
abstract = "An emerging literature suggests that variation in Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985) states of mind about childhood experiences with primary caregivers is reflected in specific linguistic features captured by the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) automated text analysis program (Pennebaker, Booth, & Francis, 2007). The current report addressed limitations of prior studies in this literature by using 2 large AAI corpora (Ns = 826 and 857) and a broader range of linguistic variables, as well as examining associations of LIWC-derived AAI dimensions with key developmental antecedents. First, regression analyses revealed that dismissing states of mind were associated with transcripts that were more truncated and deemphasized discussion of the attachment relationship whereas preoccupied states of mind were associated with longer, more conflicted, and angry narratives. Second, in aggregate, LIWC variables accounted for over a third of the variation in AAI dismissing and preoccupied states of mind, with regression weights cross-validating across samples. Third, LIWCderived dismissing and preoccupied state of mind dimensions were associated with direct observations of maternal and paternal sensitivity as well as infant attachment security in childhood, replicating the pattern of results reported in Haydon, Roisman, Owen, Booth-LaForce, and Cox (2014) using coderderived dismissing and preoccupation scores in the same sample.",
keywords = "Adult Attachment Interview, Attachment, Linguistic structure, LIWC",
author = "Theo Waters and Haydon, {Katherine C.} and Steele, {Ryan D.} and Roisman, {Glenn I.} and Cathryn Booth-LaForce",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/cbs0000035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "78--88",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science",
issn = "0008-400X",
publisher = "Canadian Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A linguistic inquiry and word count analysis of the adult attachment interview in two large corpora

AU - Waters, Theo

AU - Haydon, Katherine C.

AU - Steele, Ryan D.

AU - Roisman, Glenn I.

AU - Booth-LaForce, Cathryn

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - An emerging literature suggests that variation in Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985) states of mind about childhood experiences with primary caregivers is reflected in specific linguistic features captured by the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) automated text analysis program (Pennebaker, Booth, & Francis, 2007). The current report addressed limitations of prior studies in this literature by using 2 large AAI corpora (Ns = 826 and 857) and a broader range of linguistic variables, as well as examining associations of LIWC-derived AAI dimensions with key developmental antecedents. First, regression analyses revealed that dismissing states of mind were associated with transcripts that were more truncated and deemphasized discussion of the attachment relationship whereas preoccupied states of mind were associated with longer, more conflicted, and angry narratives. Second, in aggregate, LIWC variables accounted for over a third of the variation in AAI dismissing and preoccupied states of mind, with regression weights cross-validating across samples. Third, LIWCderived dismissing and preoccupied state of mind dimensions were associated with direct observations of maternal and paternal sensitivity as well as infant attachment security in childhood, replicating the pattern of results reported in Haydon, Roisman, Owen, Booth-LaForce, and Cox (2014) using coderderived dismissing and preoccupation scores in the same sample.

AB - An emerging literature suggests that variation in Adult Attachment Interview (AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985) states of mind about childhood experiences with primary caregivers is reflected in specific linguistic features captured by the Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) automated text analysis program (Pennebaker, Booth, & Francis, 2007). The current report addressed limitations of prior studies in this literature by using 2 large AAI corpora (Ns = 826 and 857) and a broader range of linguistic variables, as well as examining associations of LIWC-derived AAI dimensions with key developmental antecedents. First, regression analyses revealed that dismissing states of mind were associated with transcripts that were more truncated and deemphasized discussion of the attachment relationship whereas preoccupied states of mind were associated with longer, more conflicted, and angry narratives. Second, in aggregate, LIWC variables accounted for over a third of the variation in AAI dismissing and preoccupied states of mind, with regression weights cross-validating across samples. Third, LIWCderived dismissing and preoccupied state of mind dimensions were associated with direct observations of maternal and paternal sensitivity as well as infant attachment security in childhood, replicating the pattern of results reported in Haydon, Roisman, Owen, Booth-LaForce, and Cox (2014) using coderderived dismissing and preoccupation scores in the same sample.

KW - Adult Attachment Interview

KW - Attachment

KW - Linguistic structure

KW - LIWC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955327661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955327661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/cbs0000035

DO - 10.1037/cbs0000035

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84955327661

VL - 48

SP - 78

EP - 88

JO - Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

JF - Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

SN - 0008-400X

IS - 1

ER -