A liberal history of a radical movement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Making of Black Lives Matters reaches across a number of Black intellectuals and activists to identify common ground that could birth a Black Lives Matter (BLM movement), but its choice of thinkers and Lebron’s interpretation fail to produce a radical enough historiography to help readers fully engage with the emergence of the BLM movement. In response to Lebron’s text, I take up three central concerns: (1) the audience for the book, (2) which/who’s BLM movement?, and (3) the historical antecedents to BLM. The thinkers and concepts in the volume provide insight into the Black Freedom Struggle in general but do not elucidate the particular paths to or the contours of the BLM movement. The complex intersecting and interlocking agendas of BLM deserve a more radical undergirding to help readers understand the significance of the current movement relative to the past.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1435-1442
Number of pages8
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 21 2018

Fingerprint

historiography
intellectual
interpretation
history

Keywords

  • activism
  • Black Freedom Struggle
  • Black radical tradition
  • Civil Rights Movement
  • intersectionality
  • social movements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

A liberal history of a radical movement. / Lewis-Mccoy, R. L'Heureux.

In: Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 41, No. 8, 21.06.2018, p. 1435-1442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0631dfba790842c290040cfacab6995d,
title = "A liberal history of a radical movement",
abstract = "The Making of Black Lives Matters reaches across a number of Black intellectuals and activists to identify common ground that could birth a Black Lives Matter (BLM movement), but its choice of thinkers and Lebron’s interpretation fail to produce a radical enough historiography to help readers fully engage with the emergence of the BLM movement. In response to Lebron’s text, I take up three central concerns: (1) the audience for the book, (2) which/who’s BLM movement?, and (3) the historical antecedents to BLM. The thinkers and concepts in the volume provide insight into the Black Freedom Struggle in general but do not elucidate the particular paths to or the contours of the BLM movement. The complex intersecting and interlocking agendas of BLM deserve a more radical undergirding to help readers understand the significance of the current movement relative to the past.",
keywords = "activism, Black Freedom Struggle, Black radical tradition, Civil Rights Movement, intersectionality, social movements",
author = "Lewis-Mccoy, {R. L'Heureux}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/01419870.2018.1444188",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1435--1442",
journal = "Ethnic and Racial Studies",
issn = "0141-9870",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A liberal history of a radical movement

AU - Lewis-Mccoy, R. L'Heureux

PY - 2018/6/21

Y1 - 2018/6/21

N2 - The Making of Black Lives Matters reaches across a number of Black intellectuals and activists to identify common ground that could birth a Black Lives Matter (BLM movement), but its choice of thinkers and Lebron’s interpretation fail to produce a radical enough historiography to help readers fully engage with the emergence of the BLM movement. In response to Lebron’s text, I take up three central concerns: (1) the audience for the book, (2) which/who’s BLM movement?, and (3) the historical antecedents to BLM. The thinkers and concepts in the volume provide insight into the Black Freedom Struggle in general but do not elucidate the particular paths to or the contours of the BLM movement. The complex intersecting and interlocking agendas of BLM deserve a more radical undergirding to help readers understand the significance of the current movement relative to the past.

AB - The Making of Black Lives Matters reaches across a number of Black intellectuals and activists to identify common ground that could birth a Black Lives Matter (BLM movement), but its choice of thinkers and Lebron’s interpretation fail to produce a radical enough historiography to help readers fully engage with the emergence of the BLM movement. In response to Lebron’s text, I take up three central concerns: (1) the audience for the book, (2) which/who’s BLM movement?, and (3) the historical antecedents to BLM. The thinkers and concepts in the volume provide insight into the Black Freedom Struggle in general but do not elucidate the particular paths to or the contours of the BLM movement. The complex intersecting and interlocking agendas of BLM deserve a more radical undergirding to help readers understand the significance of the current movement relative to the past.

KW - activism

KW - Black Freedom Struggle

KW - Black radical tradition

KW - Civil Rights Movement

KW - intersectionality

KW - social movements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046705292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046705292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01419870.2018.1444188

DO - 10.1080/01419870.2018.1444188

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1435

EP - 1442

JO - Ethnic and Racial Studies

JF - Ethnic and Racial Studies

SN - 0141-9870

IS - 8

ER -