A groupware-based peer review process: An exploratory case study

Bridget O'Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This paper uses Lewin's planned change theory and Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory as lenses through which to describe what occurred in an organizationally flat, team-based organization when it rolled out a groupware-based peer review process. The Information Systems Department wanted to implement a high-level groupware product. The Human Resource Department wanted to enable team members to rate each other on their teambuilding skills as well as provide a criterion to be used by the organization's Policy Committee in awarding biannual bonuses. Literature related to corporate peer reviews as well as the use of groupware provided the basis for questions posed. Both nondirective and focused interviews were conducted with key players and a sampling of actual evaluation data was collected. Analysis indicated that perceived management (non)commitment to using peer review data and issues of confidentiality may have led many individuals to be skeptical about the value of a peer review. As to the use of groupware to enable the evaluation, users were quite pleased; however, planners' initial resistance to using this technology was evident and early efforts to devise usable reports were troublesome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-18
Number of pages8
JournalInforming Science
Volume2
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1999

Fingerprint

peer review
human resources
information system
data analysis
commitment
innovation
organization
interview
evaluation
management
Values

Keywords

  • Groupware
  • Innovation
  • Peer review
  • Planned change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

A groupware-based peer review process : An exploratory case study. / O'Connor, Bridget.

In: Informing Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1999, p. 11-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

O'Connor, Bridget. / A groupware-based peer review process : An exploratory case study. In: Informing Science. 1999 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 11-18.
@article{4655408701e949d5a112cc322e9f77da,
title = "A groupware-based peer review process: An exploratory case study",
abstract = "This paper uses Lewin's planned change theory and Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory as lenses through which to describe what occurred in an organizationally flat, team-based organization when it rolled out a groupware-based peer review process. The Information Systems Department wanted to implement a high-level groupware product. The Human Resource Department wanted to enable team members to rate each other on their teambuilding skills as well as provide a criterion to be used by the organization's Policy Committee in awarding biannual bonuses. Literature related to corporate peer reviews as well as the use of groupware provided the basis for questions posed. Both nondirective and focused interviews were conducted with key players and a sampling of actual evaluation data was collected. Analysis indicated that perceived management (non)commitment to using peer review data and issues of confidentiality may have led many individuals to be skeptical about the value of a peer review. As to the use of groupware to enable the evaluation, users were quite pleased; however, planners' initial resistance to using this technology was evident and early efforts to devise usable reports were troublesome.",
keywords = "Groupware, Innovation, Peer review, Planned change",
author = "Bridget O'Connor",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "11--18",
journal = "Informing Science",
issn = "1521-4672",
publisher = "Informing Science Institute",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A groupware-based peer review process

T2 - An exploratory case study

AU - O'Connor, Bridget

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This paper uses Lewin's planned change theory and Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory as lenses through which to describe what occurred in an organizationally flat, team-based organization when it rolled out a groupware-based peer review process. The Information Systems Department wanted to implement a high-level groupware product. The Human Resource Department wanted to enable team members to rate each other on their teambuilding skills as well as provide a criterion to be used by the organization's Policy Committee in awarding biannual bonuses. Literature related to corporate peer reviews as well as the use of groupware provided the basis for questions posed. Both nondirective and focused interviews were conducted with key players and a sampling of actual evaluation data was collected. Analysis indicated that perceived management (non)commitment to using peer review data and issues of confidentiality may have led many individuals to be skeptical about the value of a peer review. As to the use of groupware to enable the evaluation, users were quite pleased; however, planners' initial resistance to using this technology was evident and early efforts to devise usable reports were troublesome.

AB - This paper uses Lewin's planned change theory and Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory as lenses through which to describe what occurred in an organizationally flat, team-based organization when it rolled out a groupware-based peer review process. The Information Systems Department wanted to implement a high-level groupware product. The Human Resource Department wanted to enable team members to rate each other on their teambuilding skills as well as provide a criterion to be used by the organization's Policy Committee in awarding biannual bonuses. Literature related to corporate peer reviews as well as the use of groupware provided the basis for questions posed. Both nondirective and focused interviews were conducted with key players and a sampling of actual evaluation data was collected. Analysis indicated that perceived management (non)commitment to using peer review data and issues of confidentiality may have led many individuals to be skeptical about the value of a peer review. As to the use of groupware to enable the evaluation, users were quite pleased; however, planners' initial resistance to using this technology was evident and early efforts to devise usable reports were troublesome.

KW - Groupware

KW - Innovation

KW - Peer review

KW - Planned change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53149090574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53149090574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:53149090574

VL - 2

SP - 11

EP - 18

JO - Informing Science

JF - Informing Science

SN - 1521-4672

IS - 1

ER -