A forensic qualitative analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from anonymity seeking users

Kaylea Champion, Nora McDonald, Stephanie Bankes, Joseph Zhang, Rachel Greenstadt, Andrea Forte, Benjamin Mako Hill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    By choice or by necessity, some contributors to commons-based peer production sites use privacy-protecting services to remain anonymous. As anonymity seekers, users of the Tor network have been cast both as ill-intentioned vandals and as vulnerable populations concerned with their privacy. In this study, we use a dataset drawn from a corpus of Tor edits to Wikipedia to uncover the character of Tor users’ contributions. We build in-depth narrative descriptions of Tor users’ actions and conduct a thematic analysis that places their editing activity into seven broad groups. We find that although their use of a privacy-protecting service marks them as unusual within Wikipedia, the character of many Tor users’ contributions is in line with the expectations and norms of Wikipedia. However, our themes point to several important places where lack of trust promotes disorder, and to contributions where risks to contributors, service providers, and communities are unaligned.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number53
    JournalProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Volume3
    Issue numberCSCW
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 2019

    Fingerprint

    Wikipedia
    anonymity
    privacy
    service provider
    narrative
    lack
    community
    Group

    Keywords

    • Anonymity
    • Forensic analysis
    • Forensic qualitative analysis
    • Online communities
    • Peer production
    • Privacy
    • Thematic analysis
    • Threat models
    • Tor
    • User-generated content
    • Wikipedia

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Computer Networks and Communications

    Cite this

    Champion, K., McDonald, N., Bankes, S., Zhang, J., Greenstadt, R., Forte, A., & Hill, B. M. (2019). A forensic qualitative analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from anonymity seeking users. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), [53]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359155

    A forensic qualitative analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from anonymity seeking users. / Champion, Kaylea; McDonald, Nora; Bankes, Stephanie; Zhang, Joseph; Greenstadt, Rachel; Forte, Andrea; Hill, Benjamin Mako.

    In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, No. CSCW, 53, 11.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Champion, K, McDonald, N, Bankes, S, Zhang, J, Greenstadt, R, Forte, A & Hill, BM 2019, 'A forensic qualitative analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from anonymity seeking users', Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 3, no. CSCW, 53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359155
    Champion, Kaylea ; McDonald, Nora ; Bankes, Stephanie ; Zhang, Joseph ; Greenstadt, Rachel ; Forte, Andrea ; Hill, Benjamin Mako. / A forensic qualitative analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from anonymity seeking users. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2019 ; Vol. 3, No. CSCW.
    @article{ba86e72f5fed41938d9d1a9e618e5d55,
    title = "A forensic qualitative analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from anonymity seeking users",
    abstract = "By choice or by necessity, some contributors to commons-based peer production sites use privacy-protecting services to remain anonymous. As anonymity seekers, users of the Tor network have been cast both as ill-intentioned vandals and as vulnerable populations concerned with their privacy. In this study, we use a dataset drawn from a corpus of Tor edits to Wikipedia to uncover the character of Tor users’ contributions. We build in-depth narrative descriptions of Tor users’ actions and conduct a thematic analysis that places their editing activity into seven broad groups. We find that although their use of a privacy-protecting service marks them as unusual within Wikipedia, the character of many Tor users’ contributions is in line with the expectations and norms of Wikipedia. However, our themes point to several important places where lack of trust promotes disorder, and to contributions where risks to contributors, service providers, and communities are unaligned.",
    keywords = "Anonymity, Forensic analysis, Forensic qualitative analysis, Online communities, Peer production, Privacy, Thematic analysis, Threat models, Tor, User-generated content, Wikipedia",
    author = "Kaylea Champion and Nora McDonald and Stephanie Bankes and Joseph Zhang and Rachel Greenstadt and Andrea Forte and Hill, {Benjamin Mako}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1145/3359155",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "3",
    journal = "Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction",
    issn = "2573-0142",
    publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
    number = "CSCW",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A forensic qualitative analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from anonymity seeking users

    AU - Champion, Kaylea

    AU - McDonald, Nora

    AU - Bankes, Stephanie

    AU - Zhang, Joseph

    AU - Greenstadt, Rachel

    AU - Forte, Andrea

    AU - Hill, Benjamin Mako

    PY - 2019/11

    Y1 - 2019/11

    N2 - By choice or by necessity, some contributors to commons-based peer production sites use privacy-protecting services to remain anonymous. As anonymity seekers, users of the Tor network have been cast both as ill-intentioned vandals and as vulnerable populations concerned with their privacy. In this study, we use a dataset drawn from a corpus of Tor edits to Wikipedia to uncover the character of Tor users’ contributions. We build in-depth narrative descriptions of Tor users’ actions and conduct a thematic analysis that places their editing activity into seven broad groups. We find that although their use of a privacy-protecting service marks them as unusual within Wikipedia, the character of many Tor users’ contributions is in line with the expectations and norms of Wikipedia. However, our themes point to several important places where lack of trust promotes disorder, and to contributions where risks to contributors, service providers, and communities are unaligned.

    AB - By choice or by necessity, some contributors to commons-based peer production sites use privacy-protecting services to remain anonymous. As anonymity seekers, users of the Tor network have been cast both as ill-intentioned vandals and as vulnerable populations concerned with their privacy. In this study, we use a dataset drawn from a corpus of Tor edits to Wikipedia to uncover the character of Tor users’ contributions. We build in-depth narrative descriptions of Tor users’ actions and conduct a thematic analysis that places their editing activity into seven broad groups. We find that although their use of a privacy-protecting service marks them as unusual within Wikipedia, the character of many Tor users’ contributions is in line with the expectations and norms of Wikipedia. However, our themes point to several important places where lack of trust promotes disorder, and to contributions where risks to contributors, service providers, and communities are unaligned.

    KW - Anonymity

    KW - Forensic analysis

    KW - Forensic qualitative analysis

    KW - Online communities

    KW - Peer production

    KW - Privacy

    KW - Thematic analysis

    KW - Threat models

    KW - Tor

    KW - User-generated content

    KW - Wikipedia

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075058939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075058939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1145/3359155

    DO - 10.1145/3359155

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85075058939

    VL - 3

    JO - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

    JF - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

    SN - 2573-0142

    IS - CSCW

    M1 - 53

    ER -